Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Repub debate shows every candidate better qualified than what Dems have now
- Thread starter bedowin62
- Start date
Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
Check up on 1994 and the contract with America.Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Legislative history[edit]
Ultimately every Republican in Congress voted against the bill, as did a number of Democrats. Vice President Al Gore broke a tie in the Senate on both the Senate bill and the conference report. The House bill passed 219-213 on Thursday, May 27, 1993.[1] The House passed the conference report on Thursday, August 5, 1993, by a vote of 218 to 216 (217 Democrats and 1 independent (Sanders (I-VT)) voting in favor; 41 Democrats and 175 Republicans voting against).[2] The Senate passed the conference report on the last day before their month's vacation, on Friday, August 6, 1993, by a vote of 51 to 50 (50 Democrats plus Vice President Gore voting in favor, 6 Democrats (Lautenberg (D-NJ), Bryan (D-NV), Nunn (D-GA), Johnston (D-LA), Boren (D-OK), and Shelby (D-AL) now (R-AL)) and 44 Republicans voting against). President Clinton signed the bill on August 10, 1993.
Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
you're trying to say something without having the balls to come right out with it. you're implying that clinton's tax hike alone was responsible for the prosperty of the 90's. you dont have the balls to come out and say it because one, it's absurd, and two; it proves you idiots just see tax hikes as the "solution" to everything.
You're not very good at this, are you?
Clinton used a variety of methods to improve the economy.
You should have looked into it instead of remaining a blithering idiot. But that's what you do.Check up on 1994 and the contract with America.Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Legislative history[edit]
Ultimately every Republican in Congress voted against the bill, as did a number of Democrats. Vice President Al Gore broke a tie in the Senate on both the Senate bill and the conference report. The House bill passed 219-213 on Thursday, May 27, 1993.[1] The House passed the conference report on Thursday, August 5, 1993, by a vote of 218 to 216 (217 Democrats and 1 independent (Sanders (I-VT)) voting in favor; 41 Democrats and 175 Republicans voting against).[2] The Senate passed the conference report on the last day before their month's vacation, on Friday, August 6, 1993, by a vote of 51 to 50 (50 Democrats plus Vice President Gore voting in favor, 6 Democrats (Lautenberg (D-NJ), Bryan (D-NV), Nunn (D-GA), Johnston (D-LA), Boren (D-OK), and Shelby (D-AL) now (R-AL)) and 44 Republicans voting against). President Clinton signed the bill on August 10, 1993.
Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
No, Bill Clinton Didn't Balance the Budget
Let us establish one point definitively: Bill Clinton didn’t balance the budget. Yes, he was there when it happened. But the record shows that was about the extent of his contribution.
Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.
And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?
Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.
As yes..the CATO institute.
again dimwit. what was the major item clinton did to improve the economy??
-Tax hikes.
-Investment in Telecommunication infrastructure.
-Block grants that provided retraining for displaced workers because of NAFTA.
-Welfare changes that provided credit and or grants for school.
-Tax credits for oil exploration.
Look ma, no google.
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
Clinton signed on, we can give him credit for that at least. What specifically did CATO get wrong? You fled from it so I'm guessing not much.Check up on 1994 and the contract with America.Clinton had a Republican congress (the people that write the checks) and Bush ended up with Democrats, who voted for and funded those wars. Bush cut taxes for everyone, which has been extended except for the top bracket. You're suffering from a classic case of looking at the world with blinders on. Like all idiots.
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Legislative history[edit]
Ultimately every Republican in Congress voted against the bill, as did a number of Democrats. Vice President Al Gore broke a tie in the Senate on both the Senate bill and the conference report. The House bill passed 219-213 on Thursday, May 27, 1993.[1] The House passed the conference report on Thursday, August 5, 1993, by a vote of 218 to 216 (217 Democrats and 1 independent (Sanders (I-VT)) voting in favor; 41 Democrats and 175 Republicans voting against).[2] The Senate passed the conference report on the last day before their month's vacation, on Friday, August 6, 1993, by a vote of 51 to 50 (50 Democrats plus Vice President Gore voting in favor, 6 Democrats (Lautenberg (D-NJ), Bryan (D-NV), Nunn (D-GA), Johnston (D-LA), Boren (D-OK), and Shelby (D-AL) now (R-AL)) and 44 Republicans voting against). President Clinton signed the bill on August 10, 1993.
Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
you're trying to say something without having the balls to come right out with it. you're implying that clinton's tax hike alone was responsible for the prosperty of the 90's. you dont have the balls to come out and say it because one, it's absurd, and two; it proves you idiots just see tax hikes as the "solution" to everything.
You're not very good at this, are you?
Clinton used a variety of methods to improve the economy.
You should have looked into it instead of remaining a blithering idiot. But that's what you do.Check up on 1994 and the contract with America.Clinton had a Republican congress (the people that write the checks) and Bush ended up with Democrats, who voted for and funded those wars. Bush cut taxes for everyone, which has been extended except for the top bracket. You're suffering from a classic case of looking at the world with blinders on. Like all idiots.
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Legislative history[edit]
Ultimately every Republican in Congress voted against the bill, as did a number of Democrats. Vice President Al Gore broke a tie in the Senate on both the Senate bill and the conference report. The House bill passed 219-213 on Thursday, May 27, 1993.[1] The House passed the conference report on Thursday, August 5, 1993, by a vote of 218 to 216 (217 Democrats and 1 independent (Sanders (I-VT)) voting in favor; 41 Democrats and 175 Republicans voting against).[2] The Senate passed the conference report on the last day before their month's vacation, on Friday, August 6, 1993, by a vote of 51 to 50 (50 Democrats plus Vice President Gore voting in favor, 6 Democrats (Lautenberg (D-NJ), Bryan (D-NV), Nunn (D-GA), Johnston (D-LA), Boren (D-OK), and Shelby (D-AL) now (R-AL)) and 44 Republicans voting against). President Clinton signed the bill on August 10, 1993.
Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
No, Bill Clinton Didn't Balance the Budget
Let us establish one point definitively: Bill Clinton didn’t balance the budget. Yes, he was there when it happened. But the record shows that was about the extent of his contribution.
Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.
And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?
Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.
As yes..the CATO institute.
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
Oh, he raised taxes a bit and spent money. That always works. Can you use your google-fu to back that up?-Tax hikes.
-Investment in Telecommunication infrastructure.
-Block grants that provided retraining for displaced workers because of NAFTA.
-Welfare changes that provided credit and or grants for school.
-Tax credits for oil exploration.
Look ma, no google.
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
- Thread starter
- #45
Check up on 1994 and the contract with America.
Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
you're trying to say something without having the balls to come right out with it. you're implying that clinton's tax hike alone was responsible for the prosperty of the 90's. you dont have the balls to come out and say it because one, it's absurd, and two; it proves you idiots just see tax hikes as the "solution" to everything.
You're not very good at this, are you?
Clinton used a variety of methods to improve the economy.
You should have looked into it instead of remaining a blithering idiot. But that's what you do.Check up on 1994 and the contract with America.
Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
No, Bill Clinton Didn't Balance the Budget
Let us establish one point definitively: Bill Clinton didn’t balance the budget. Yes, he was there when it happened. But the record shows that was about the extent of his contribution.
Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.
And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?
Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.
As yes..the CATO institute.
again dimwit. what was the major item clinton did to improve the economy??
-Tax hikes.
-Investment in Telecommunication infrastructure.
-Block grants that provided retraining for displaced workers because of NAFTA.
-Welfare changes that provided credit and or grants for school.
-Tax credits for oil exploration.
Look ma, no google.
you're providing micro examples in a macro economy. you are simply a clown and i need to school you every day.
now let's compare the impact of those items to the impact of things you are trying to conveniantly ignore; like Clinton's welfare reform that restricted the time spent on welfare
Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
you're trying to say something without having the balls to come right out with it. you're implying that clinton's tax hike alone was responsible for the prosperty of the 90's. you dont have the balls to come out and say it because one, it's absurd, and two; it proves you idiots just see tax hikes as the "solution" to everything.
You're not very good at this, are you?
Clinton used a variety of methods to improve the economy.
You should have looked into it instead of remaining a blithering idiot. But that's what you do.Had nothing at all to do with what Clinton did legislatively that had a positive effect on the deficit and debt. Ultimately, Newt Gingrich was forced out of congress.
No, Bill Clinton Didn't Balance the Budget
Let us establish one point definitively: Bill Clinton didn’t balance the budget. Yes, he was there when it happened. But the record shows that was about the extent of his contribution.
Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.
And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?
Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.
As yes..the CATO institute.
again dimwit. what was the major item clinton did to improve the economy??
-Tax hikes.
-Investment in Telecommunication infrastructure.
-Block grants that provided retraining for displaced workers because of NAFTA.
-Welfare changes that provided credit and or grants for school.
-Tax credits for oil exploration.
Look ma, no google.
you're providing micro examples in a macro economy. you are simply a clown and i need to school you every day.
now let's compare the impact of those items to the impact of things you are trying to conveniantly ignore; like Clinton's welfare reform that restricted the time spent on welfare
Moving goalposts?
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
- Thread starter
- #48
you're trying to say something without having the balls to come right out with it. you're implying that clinton's tax hike alone was responsible for the prosperty of the 90's. you dont have the balls to come out and say it because one, it's absurd, and two; it proves you idiots just see tax hikes as the "solution" to everything.
You're not very good at this, are you?
Clinton used a variety of methods to improve the economy.
You should have looked into it instead of remaining a blithering idiot. But that's what you do.
No, Bill Clinton Didn't Balance the Budget
Let us establish one point definitively: Bill Clinton didn’t balance the budget. Yes, he was there when it happened. But the record shows that was about the extent of his contribution.
Many in the media have flubbed this story. The New York Times on October 1st said, “Clinton balances the budget.” Others have praised George Bush. Political analyst Bill Schneider declared on CNN that Bush is one of “the real heroes” for his willingness to raise taxes — and never mind read my lips. (Once upon a time, lying was something that was considered wrong in Washington, but under the last two presidents our standards have dropped.) In any case, crediting George Bush for the end of the deficit requires some nifty logical somersaults, since the deficit hit its Mount Everest peak of $290 billion in St. George’s last year in office.
And 1993 — the year of the giant Clinton tax hike — was not the turning point in the deficit wars, either. In fact, in 1995, two years after that tax hike, the budget baseline submitted by the president’s own Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted $200 billion deficits for as far as the eye could see. The figure shows the Clinton deficit baseline. What changed this bleak outlook?
Newt Gingrich and company — for all their faults — have received virtually no credit for balancing the budget. Yet today’s surplus is, in part, a byproduct of the GOP’s single-minded crusade to end 30 years of red ink. Arguably, Gingrich’s finest hour as Speaker came in March 1995 when he rallied the entire Republican House caucus behind the idea of eliminating the deficit within seven years.
As yes..the CATO institute.
again dimwit. what was the major item clinton did to improve the economy??
-Tax hikes.
-Investment in Telecommunication infrastructure.
-Block grants that provided retraining for displaced workers because of NAFTA.
-Welfare changes that provided credit and or grants for school.
-Tax credits for oil exploration.
Look ma, no google.
you're providing micro examples in a macro economy. you are simply a clown and i need to school you every day.
now let's compare the impact of those items to the impact of things you are trying to conveniantly ignore; like Clinton's welfare reform that restricted the time spent on welfare
Moving goalposts?
not at all; your examples are laughable
Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
i'm sure obama will propose block grants for people who lose jobs on account of his TWO trade deals; the TPP and TTIP. that means you support them right genius???
I don't support either the TPP or the TTIP. Didn't support NAFTA either.
Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
You're not very good at this, are you?
Clinton used a variety of methods to improve the economy.
As yes..the CATO institute.
again dimwit. what was the major item clinton did to improve the economy??
-Tax hikes.
-Investment in Telecommunication infrastructure.
-Block grants that provided retraining for displaced workers because of NAFTA.
-Welfare changes that provided credit and or grants for school.
-Tax credits for oil exploration.
Look ma, no google.
you're providing micro examples in a macro economy. you are simply a clown and i need to school you every day.
now let's compare the impact of those items to the impact of things you are trying to conveniantly ignore; like Clinton's welfare reform that restricted the time spent on welfare
Moving goalposts?
not at all; your examples are laughable
Not as laughable as Reagan or George W. Bush ruining the economy.
That's what you conservatives give us. Obscenely rich folks, war, huge unemployment, poverty and huge deficits and debt.
Proud are you?
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
- Thread starter
- #52
i'm sure obama will propose block grants for people who lose jobs on account of his TWO trade deals; the TPP and TTIP. that means you support them right genius???
I don't support either the TPP or the TTIP. Didn't support NAFTA either.
but your position is they improved the economy!!!!
and with those block grants what the problem is????????????????????
Campbell
Gold Member
- Aug 20, 2015
- 3,866
- 646
- 255
You know it, you saw it, a field brimming with something you dont see in Democrats; COMPETENCE!!
Virtually every Republican candidate up there is more qualified than what we have now for a President, and especially the losers running on the Democrat Party ticket.
Doesn't really make a difference. When all the Blacks, Latinos, Gays, Lesbians, Transgenders, poor folks, atheists, agnostics, most young people and most women get to the polls the only thing that will keep Hillary from winning is if the Republicans figure out some way to keep people from being able to vote and you can bet your ass they're already working on it.
Democrats have gotten the most votes in five of the last six presidential elections and unless the Republican party makes some serious changes to it's platform issues they will never inhabit the white house again.
you are easily one of the biggest idiots posting here; if you had everybody from all those groups in your camp there would be virtually no Republicans in office anywhere
Republicans have gerrymandered selected voting districts and precincts and that's why they win house and senate seats but they will more than likely never see the White House again. Pay attention! Shit happens.
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
- Thread starter
- #54
You know it, you saw it, a field brimming with something you dont see in Democrats; COMPETENCE!!
Virtually every Republican candidate up there is more qualified than what we have now for a President, and especially the losers running on the Democrat Party ticket.
Doesn't really make a difference. When all the Blacks, Latinos, Gays, Lesbians, Transgenders, poor folks, atheists, agnostics, most young people and most women get to the polls the only thing that will keep Hillary from winning is if the Republicans figure out some way to keep people from being able to vote and you can bet your ass they're already working on it.
Democrats have gotten the most votes in five of the last six presidential elections and unless the Republican party makes some serious changes to it's platform issues they will never inhabit the white house again.
you are easily one of the biggest idiots posting here; if you had everybody from all those groups in your camp there would be virtually no Republicans in office anywhere
Republicans have gerrymandered selected voting districts and precincts and that's why they win house and senate seats but they will more than likely never see the White House again. Pay attention! Shit happens.
seats are give according to the Census; the OBAMA CENSUS in this case.
you losers and your pathetic excuse-making are just sad
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
- Thread starter
- #55
actually you self-deceiving idiot the reason Republicans struggle more with national elections has more to do with the Electoral College than it does districts and how they are drawn
why do you people lie to yourselves and expect others to drink the kool-aid too?
why do you people lie to yourselves and expect others to drink the kool-aid too?
Campbell
Gold Member
- Aug 20, 2015
- 3,866
- 646
- 255
so your own logic is that the tax hike wasnt the main reason for the success of the clinton years?
then why are you idiots always so keen to raise taxes?
i love it when you paint yourselves into a corner!!
Just curious.....when was the last time Republicans did something for ordinary working class people in America? The biggest thing I've seen them accomplish in the last 35 years is cut tax rates for the wealthy, start wars and take on new debt:
...........................Total U S Debt..........................
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 (Bill Clinton Raised Tax Rates On The Rich)
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)(Continued To Spend Like A Drunk Sailor)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
Last edited:
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
- Thread starter
- #57
ordinary and working-class people had it MUCH BETTER WHEN REPUBLICANS RAN THINGS
just curious who do left-wing idiots think make up the 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps under obama in YEAR SEVEN?
are they all immigrants who just got here?
people who have always been poor?
or PEOPLE WHO WENT FROM ABOVE POOR TO POOR UNDER OBAMA???
just curious who do left-wing idiots think make up the 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps under obama in YEAR SEVEN?
are they all immigrants who just got here?
people who have always been poor?
or PEOPLE WHO WENT FROM ABOVE POOR TO POOR UNDER OBAMA???
ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #58
All I seen was cut, slash, deregulate and bomb.
Well, you need to fund infrastructure, science, r&d, education and a thousand other areas for a successful country.
Sorry, but your party sucks for 99% of Americans.
Well, you need to fund infrastructure, science, r&d, education and a thousand other areas for a successful country.
Sorry, but your party sucks for 99% of Americans.
ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #59
All these tax cuts for the rich made things worse...The rich get richer and own the entire market place,,,while 90% of the rest of the country gets fucked.
The republican tea party idiots in this thread must be owned by the top 5%.
The republican tea party idiots in this thread must be owned by the top 5%.
bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
- Thread starter
- #60
All I seen was cut, slash, deregulate and bomb.
Well, you need to fund infrastructure, science, r&d, education and a thousand other areas for a successful country.
Sorry, but your party sucks for 99% of Americans.
ALL I SEEN WAS YOUR JACKASS PARTY VOTING FOR, even EXTENDING, virtually everything you are crying about
all i see is you making a fool of yourself
Similar threads
- Replies
- 85
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 161
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 728
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 692
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 69
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 15
- Replies
- 173
- Views
- 2K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8306
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-