Report: Beto Fantasizes About Murdering Children

As a conservative, Beto is the one canidate who scares the hell out of me. He connects with a large demographic. He took a former comservative Presidential politician to the wall in a very red state. I think he can invigorate a lot of liberal minded people. I hope they dig up some real dirt other than a cartoon drawn by an adolescent.

Never underestimate or dismiss your enemy.
 
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.
 
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.

He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
 
Last edited:
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.

He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
General who was instrumental in winning the last war.

Governor.

Senator.

Vice-President.

Something like that makes you somewhat qualified to run for President.

Congressman, not enough.

Guy who lost an election, not enough.
 
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.

He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
General who was instrumental in winning the last war.

Governor.

Senator.

Vice-President.

Something like that makes you somewhat qualified to run for President.

Congressman, not enough.

Guy who lost an election, not enough.

So then you are saying Trump should not have run?
 
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.

He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
General who was instrumental in winning the last war.

Governor.

Senator.

Vice-President.

Something like that makes you somewhat qualified to run for President.

Congressman, not enough.

Guy who lost an election, not enough.

So then you are saying Trump should not have run?
Billionaire and TV personality apparently are enough to run for President.

At least the American people think so.
 
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.

He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
General who was instrumental in winning the last war.

Governor.

Senator.

Vice-President.

Something like that makes you somewhat qualified to run for President.

Congressman, not enough.

Guy who lost an election, not enough.

So then you are saying Trump should not have run?
Billionaire and TV personality apparently are enough to run for President.

At least the American people think so.

Yeah, but not according to you because he does not meet any of your above listed criteria.

Personally, I think it is totally irrelevant what you did to qualify to be POTUS. What matters is what kind of a person are you and where do you stand on the issues.
And I don't trust politicians AT ALL...only fools do, IMO.
So not being one is a bonus to me - not a negative.

And I disagree with the general's thing. Most generals make terrible leaders. They have MASSIVE egos, cannot relate to normal people (because they spend their whole lives in the cocoon of the military) and are used to having TOTAL control. That does not bode well for POTUS. Dictatorships, sure. But not POTUS.
Sure Ike was a good POTUS. But he was not an egomaniacal general (like Patton or MacArthur were), he was a logistics guy who was good at bringing people together.
 
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.

He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
General who was instrumental in winning the last war.

Governor.

Senator.

Vice-President.

Something like that makes you somewhat qualified to run for President.

Congressman, not enough.

Guy who lost an election, not enough.

So then you are saying Trump should not have run?
Billionaire and TV personality apparently are enough to run for President.

At least the American people think so.

Yeah, but not according to you because he does not meet any of your above listed criteria.

Personally, I think it is totally irrelevant what you did to qualify to be POTUS. What matters is what kind of a person are you and where do you stand on the issues.
And I don't trust politicians AT ALL...only fools do, IMO.
So not being one is a bonus to me - not a negative.

And I disagree with the general's thing. Most generals make terrible leaders. They have MASSIVE egos, cannot relate to normal people (because they spend their whole lives in the cocoon of the military) and are used to having TOTAL control. That does not bode well for POTUS. Dictatorships, sure. But not POTUS.
Sure Ike was a good POTUS. But he was not an egomaniacal general (like Patton or MacArthur were), he was a logistics guy who was good at bringing people together.
Some of our greatest Presidents were generals.
 
He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.
General who was instrumental in winning the last war.

Governor.

Senator.

Vice-President.

Something like that makes you somewhat qualified to run for President.

Congressman, not enough.

Guy who lost an election, not enough.

So then you are saying Trump should not have run?
Billionaire and TV personality apparently are enough to run for President.

At least the American people think so.

Yeah, but not according to you because he does not meet any of your above listed criteria.

Personally, I think it is totally irrelevant what you did to qualify to be POTUS. What matters is what kind of a person are you and where do you stand on the issues.
And I don't trust politicians AT ALL...only fools do, IMO.
So not being one is a bonus to me - not a negative.

And I disagree with the general's thing. Most generals make terrible leaders. They have MASSIVE egos, cannot relate to normal people (because they spend their whole lives in the cocoon of the military) and are used to having TOTAL control. That does not bode well for POTUS. Dictatorships, sure. But not POTUS.
Sure Ike was a good POTUS. But he was not an egomaniacal general (like Patton or MacArthur were), he was a logistics guy who was good at bringing people together.
Some of our greatest Presidents were generals.

You are talking about ancient history - practically. Being a General in the 20'th Century - especially since the late 1930's is near totally different then before that. Back when, the military was FAR smaller during peace time (which is the way it SHOULD be). So being a general was much different. You were judged on how good you were in combat. Today, being a general in the US is like running your own, little dictatorship.
Ike was the only US President who was a general in the 20'th century.
No way - today, the LAST thing I want is a US general running for office. They know NOTHING about business - spending their whole adult lives as bureaucrats.
And I would NEVER vote for someone who did not have at least some direct experience in business.
 
When Beto O’Rourke was young, he once wrote a "murder fantasy" short story about running over two children with a car, according to a new report that also revealed the now-presidential candidate was a member of a famous hack.
Whst kind od Sicko is this guy?

A sicko?

What are you - stuck in 1968?

Let think about this and if this were about Baron Trump writing about running kids over while belonging to a hacker group how many on the left would be screaming about it?
 
Beto O'Rourke pissed off the wrong people so now they're out to destroy him.

Can you imagine a grown man being destroyed because of some shit he wrote when he was a kid?


Year just like what the DIM'S tried to do to Judge Kavanaugh!
 
Is any body else as surprised as I am about this??

Also, according to reports, he was part of a hacking group.

And that he wrote stories under the name Psychedelic Warlord.

Great name, huh?

More here:

Young Beto O'Rourke wrote 'murder fantasy' about running over children, was part of famed hacking group: report
Ah, yes, more selective outrage from Fox News and this sub. It’s incredible to me how you people immediately buy into this story yet any negative coverage of Trump is “fake news”.

This narrative is basically saying that anyone who writes dark, violent FICTION must be psychopath at heart because, of course - it’s about a liberal. I mean shit if this was Mitch McConnell and was on HuffPost instead, Fox would straight up defend such creative license of just being a teenager. No harm done of course! Boys will be boys....that Beto though.....he’s a psychopath!

Um, just last week the liberals nuttjobs were trying to take down Tucker Carlson over a comment he made on a shock jock radio show. So liberals can't attack a FOX host for offensive comment but go on to excuse a democratic running for president for writing a story about violently murdering innocent children...
 
Trump OWNS Fox.
They are no longer fair, balanced or even a fucking news outlet.

You idiots should educate yourself to the facts:

The Making of the Fox News White House
Fox News has always been partisan. But has it become propaganda?

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house

This article provides names, dates and places.
.
.
One small example of the global government that you will rue the day on in the future....A Mini car commercial with a black guy singing in the car with the radio..."Don't fence me in"....Just another subtle satanic induced blip for the under educated to be manipulated. FOX news is nothing. Only a few people are conservatives. Many moderates, left wing Repubs and progressive socialists are part of it. There should be right wing stations comparable to just CNN and MSNBC. And that is the beginning. Another example....Nighttime talk shows with moderate to conservative hosts that speak politics like colbert, fallon, conan, and kimmel. And that is just the tip of the iceberg.
 
I read part of it. That was sick! I hope that gets played everywhere! No one sane thinks like that.

does that go for the people that go and see the "Saw" movies or all the other movies of that genre?
 
Is any body else as surprised as I am about this??

Also, according to reports, he was part of a hacking group.

And that he wrote stories under the name Psychedelic Warlord.

Great name, huh?

More here:

Young Beto O'Rourke wrote 'murder fantasy' about running over children, was part of famed hacking group: report
15?

Did you read your link?

He wrote this:
part of his goal seeking "the termination of everything that was free and loving."

That sounds exactly like a Trump supporter. I guess Beto grew up.
 
Like him or hate him you know what you have with Trump but the more we learn about the skate boarding middle aged Beto the stranger he seems.
 
Beto should wait until he's accomplished something before running for President.

He's (apparently) a successful businessman and a three term congressman.

How much more does he have to accomplish before you deem him fit to run for POTUS?


BTW - I would never vote for the guy. But then, I will (probably) never vote for a Democrat or a Republican.

Well, if Hillary sets the bar, evidently someone doesn't need to accomplish anything.
 

Forum List

Back
Top