Replacement SCOTUS Justice no males and no whites need apply

[lg325]

Biden's pledge to appoint Black woman back in spotlight amid Breyer retirement — The Hill

President Biden's pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court is receiving renewed attention in the wake of reports [](https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/560353-justice-breyer-announces-retiremen)

apple.news

I think this is the EXACTLY way we should choose jurists. You know: solely on the basis of gender and race.

I suspect Justice William O. Douglas will be spinning in his grave — like a top.

To be honest I thought that there was black woman on the USSC. Sotomyere I believe her name is. ( not being sarcastic)

 

[FA_Q2]

To be honest I thought that there was black woman on the USSC. Sotomyere I believe her name is. ( not being sarcastic)

The 'wise latina' that makes rulings based on utterly spurious and incorrect information.

Not a black woman. A latina woman.

 

[ColonelAngus]

AGAIN

Reagan announced that he would only consider a woman and appointed O'Conner

Bush the greater announced he would only consider a black person...and appointed Thomas

TRUMP announced he would only consider a woman and appointed Barrett

Just ******* stop

See the problem here?

This poster just straight up lies. They will continue to tell the same lies, even after being proven wrong.

Communists are disingenuous liars. They say whatever they have to say to promote their agenda, regardless of the truth.

 

[otto105]

You libs have such short memories …. Remember what liberals did to Janice Rogers Brown.

When did WWIII happen?

 

[otto105]

See the problem here?

This poster just straight up lies. They will continue to tell the same lies, even after being proven wrong.

Communists are disingenuous liars. They say whatever they have to say to promote their agenda, regardless of the truth.

Reagan did announce that he would nominate a women to the court.

 

[j-mac]

When did WWIII happen?

Huh? WWIII? WTH, are you talking about.

 

[BackAgain]

Heritage is pro trump. End of story. Always has been full of it.

Story continues.

Heritage is independent and has always expressed views with progressives.

You have always been full of it.

 

[BackAgain]

Answer, Sandra Day O’Conner.

yeah, we should pick them based on their abortion stance…

We largely do these days.

In any event, that info does inform us at least a bit about how they “interpret” the Constitution.

 

[BackAgain]

So, you are "aware" that Reagan's first choice was women nominees and yet have a problem with Biden's first choice?

Do you see now, why I called you a moron in my first post? Is that glaringly obvious? No? That's because you are a moron.

Wrong again. You have a serious mental deficit when it comes to comprehending words. As I’ve tried to explain several times to you and your fellow libtards, I object to limiting the field of prospective nominees by race or gender.

We know Reagan selected a female. What we don’t know is whether he excluded males from consideration. If he did, I do disagree with that.

Get an intelligent adult to work through this with you. You need help. You just aren’t smart.

 

[BackAgain]

To be honest I thought that there was black woman on the USSC. Sotomyere I believe her name is. ( not being sarcastic)

She is a Latina.

 

[Lesh]

See the problem here?

This poster just straight up lies. They will continue to tell the same lies, even after being proven wrong.

Communists are disingenuous liars. They say whatever they have to say to promote their agenda, regardless of the truth.

Show us this "lie" asshole

 

[Lesh]

We know Reagan selected a female. What we don’t know is whether he excluded males from consideration. If he did, I do disagree with that.

Reagan, Bush, and Trump all did similar things in appointments and said so.

You know this because it has been pointed out to you about 12 times already

 

[BackAgain]

Reagan, Bush, and Trump all did similar things in appointments and said so.

You know this because it has been pointed out to you about 12 times already

I can’t help you understand those “word” things.

I don’t “know” any such thing. Neither do you.

What we do know is that they said shit similar to what Brandon said. If they followed through (which is something you don’t know), then they excluded men from consideration. I consider that very inappropriate. But I don’t get a say on old historical events.

I do get a say in objecting to something which appears likely to happen now or in the near future. Just as Brandon OUGHT TO consider women and blacks as potential justices, so too he OUGHT TO consider males and whites.

DON’T exclude any race or either gender from consideration because the ones you exclude from consideration may contain the singularly best available candidate.

 

[Magnus]

Wrong again. You have a serious mental deficit when it comes to comprehending words. As I’ve tried to explain several times to you and your fellow libtards, I object to limiting the field of prospective nominees by race or gender.

We know Reagan selected a female. What we don’t know is whether he excluded males from consideration. If he did, I do disagree with that.

Get an intelligent adult to work through this with you. You need help. You just aren’t smart.

Talking about mental deficiency... what part of these sentences from Reagan's news conference that you don't get?

Ronald Reagan, striving to refute charges that he is insensitive to women's rights, said today he would name a woman to "one of the first Supreme Court vacancies in my administration."

"It is time for a woman to sit among our highest jurists," Reagan said in a prepared statement to a news conference here. "I will also seek out women to appoint to other federal courts in an effort to bring about a better balance on the federal bench."

Not only is Reagan on record that he would nominate a woman, but he also went ahead and did so by appointing Sandra Day O'Connor.

You may want to take a break from this site and brush up on your reading/comprehension skills. I can't dumb this down any further. Good luck with your studies and keep us informed on your progress.

 

[BackAgain]

Talking about mental deficiency... what part of these sentences from Reagan's news conference that you don't get?

Ronald Reagan, striving to refute charges that he is insensitive to women's rights, said today he would name a woman to "one of the first Supreme Court vacancies in my administration."

"It is time for a woman to sit among our highest jurists," Reagan said in a prepared statement to a news conference here. "I will also seek out women to appoint to other federal courts in an effort to bring about a better balance on the federal bench."

Not only is Reagan on record that he would nominate a woman, but he also went ahead and did so by appointing Sandra Day O'Connor.

You may want to take a break from this site and brush up on your reading/comprehension skills. I can't dumb this down any further. Good luck with your studies and keep us informed on your progress.

I understand what he said, you completely dense retard.

We also see that he did select a female, you simpleton. Nobody disputes any of that, you twit.

What we do NOT know is whether he eventually excluded all males from even being considered. If he did, I think that was a mistake.

I can’t do anything about it even if he did follow through and exclude all males from even being considered. By contrast, I still have a microscopic say in what Brandon has said he would do.

I have no say in the fact that your skull is fact and logic impervious.

 

[jc456]

Can’t get anymore racist and womanizer

 

[jc456]

Talking about mental deficiency... what part of these sentences from Reagan's news conference that you don't get?

Ronald Reagan, striving to refute charges that he is insensitive to women's rights, said today he would name a woman to "one of the first Supreme Court vacancies in my administration."

"It is time for a woman to sit among our highest jurists," Reagan said in a prepared statement to a news conference here. "I will also seek out women to appoint to other federal courts in an effort to bring about a better balance on the federal bench."

Not only is Reagan on record that he would nominate a woman, but he also went ahead and did so by appointing Sandra Day O'Connor.

You may want to take a break from this site and brush up on your reading/comprehension skills. I can't dumb this down any further. Good luck with your studies and keep us informed on your progress.

Isn’t Reagan dead? That’s called a diversion from today

 

[g5000]

Replacement SCOTUS Justice no males and no whites need apply​

Biden is playing three-dimensional chess and owning the cons.

 

[BackAgain]

Biden is playing three-dimensional chess and owning the cons.

Biden can’t even handle checkers. Who the **** do you think you’re kidding?

 

[FA_Q2]

Biden is playing three-dimensional chess and owning the cons.

Really?

You think this a move indicative of 'three-dimensional chess.'

I cannot see how that statement applies at all.