Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JOKER96BRAVO said:I wanted to make the results open but...
I think I'll get more honest answers this way.
Please answer honestly.
JOKER96BRAVO said:Given rep out of spite.
Given rep just because.
Given "back atcha" yep.
Given rep to reflect anything other than it's original intent.
dilloduck said:okey dokey
According to a few on the other thread, not all of us.archangel said:I agree according to the criteria geez we are guilty...including joker! sigh.......!
JOKER96BRAVO said:According to a few on the other thread, not all of us.
I admit, I'm guilty. Trying to prove a point that the rep system
doesn't reflect what it's meant to.
JOKER96BRAVO said:According to a few on the other thread, not all of us.
I admit, I'm guilty. Trying to prove a point that the rep system
doesn't reflect what it's meant to.
-=d=- said:The rep system reflects the individual users. It only works if we police ourselves; and take PERSONAL responsibility for it's use. It's a judgement call:
"Somebody dinged my rep, I'll ding them right back!"
"Someobdy gave me rep, I'll give them rep right back!"
Use the honor system when using the Rep or PM features. Use 'good judgement' when repping.
If those policies are enforced by we, the users, the rep system won't be a problem.
As I've posted via Sticky...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/forums/announcement.php?f=5&announcementid=7
dilloduck said:"good judgement" is highly subjective, D. One's judgement varies as widley as opinions on this board. One might feel perfectly justified in what they are doing, yet when interpreted by a moderator it might be interpretted differently. I know you find it appalling that everyone doesn't have the same sense of right or wrong as you do but it's just the way it is.
I can understand why someone might resent a public insult and feel the need to respond to it but whiners who are hurt because someone said something to them privately need to be aware that they are responsible for what they post. They take a chance that someone might negatively rep them every time they post. If someone knows that they will be hurt by criticism or negative rep they should be responsible for that truth about themselves. Not whine when it happens.
-=d=- said:I have more faith in ppl to know right from wrong.
here's a tip - Being justified in one's actions doesn't mean the action is always the 'rigth thing to do'.
dilloduck said:here's another tip---when you ask for people to use thier own judgement, don't try to tell em thier judgement is all screwed up.
I'm asking about possitive rep too.GotZoom said:When I drive down the street and someone cuts me off, I don't resort to "road rage" because I know it is wrong.
I don't think it is that difficult to resist the urge to "rep rage" someone who dings you.
Rep based on the "post", not the "poster."
This isn't brain surgery.
GotZoom said:I don't think it is that difficult to resist the urge to "rep rage" someone who dings you.
.
JOKER96BRAVO said:Given rep out of spite.
Given rep just because.
Given "back atcha" yep.
Given rep to reflect anything other than it's original intent.
JOKER96BRAVO said:I have a hard time believing that 9 out of 12 people voted no.
I wish I could see who it was, might be able to prove them wrong.
-=d=- said:I 'can' see who voted - and let me tell you; of the 9 that voted 'no' at least a couple are liars at worst, lack the ability to accurately assess right from wrong at best.
For the 2 who voted 'Yes, but only for positive rep' one is a liar.
Oh well...
