Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
.
House Budget Committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan drafted a plan with Patty Murray which would cut veterans benefits. He now Doubles Down on Cutting Veteran Pensions
What Paul Ryan intentionally refuses to acknowledge is, of the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government by our Constitution which are intended to promote the general welfare of the United States, one just happens to be its power over our nations military. Unlike the countless federal government free-cheese programs not authorized by our Constitution and which work to balloon our annual federal deficits, providing for our nations veterans is a legitimate and constitutionally based obligation.
Ryans reforms ought to begin with a twenty percent cut of every social welfare program which is not within the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government. To not do so is to advance the pinko progressive agenda which has made our productive members of society tax slaves to those enjoying the ride on Obamas free-cheese wagon.
Only a progressive snake who ignores the intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted would agree to cut veterans benefits, especially when our nations veterans have not only put their lives on the line for our country, but millions have become disabled in the process.
Let us work to remove this progressive snake from office this coming election and replace him with one who not only supports our nations military, but will work to end free government cheese which is destroying our country from within.
JWK
Reaching across the aisle and bipartisanship is Washington Newspeak to subvert the Constitution and screw the American People.
A politician who cuts spending is generally called a "conservative," not a "progressive."
Hope that lesson in Political Science 101 helped you.
Unless he cuts where the OP doesn't want cuts..
House Budget Committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan drafted a plan with Patty Murray which would cut veterans benefits. He now Doubles Down on Cutting Veteran Pensions
What Paul Ryan intentionally refuses to acknowledge is, of the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government by our Constitution which are intended to promote the general welfare of the United States, one just happens to be its power over our nation’s military. Unlike the countless federal government free-cheese programs not authorized by our Constitution and which work to balloon our annual federal deficits, providing for our nation’s veterans is a legitimate and constitutionally based obligation.
Ryan’s “reforms” ought to begin with a twenty percent cut of every social welfare program which is not within the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government. To not do so is to advance the pinko progressive agenda which has made our productive members of society tax slaves to those enjoying the ride on Obama’s free-cheese wagon.
Only a progressive snake who ignores the intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted would agree to cut veterans benefits, especially when our nation’s veterans have not only put their lives on the line for our country, but millions have become disabled in the process.
Let us work to remove this progressive snake from office this coming election and replace him with one who not only supports our nation’s military, but will work to end free government cheese which is destroying our country from within.
JWK
Reaching across the aisle and bipartisanship is Washington Newspeak to subvert the Constitution and screw the American People.
A politician who cuts spending is generally called a "conservative," not a "progressive."
Hope that lesson in Political Science 101 helped you.
.
House Budget Committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan drafted a plan with Patty Murray which would cut veterans benefits. He now Doubles Down on Cutting Veteran Pensions
What Paul Ryan intentionally refuses to acknowledge is, of the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government by our Constitution which are intended to promote the general welfare of the United States, one just happens to be its power over our nations military. Unlike the countless federal government free-cheese programs not authorized by our Constitution and which work to balloon our annual federal deficits, providing for our nations veterans is a legitimate and constitutionally based obligation.
Ryans reforms ought to begin with a twenty percent cut of every social welfare program which is not within the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government. To not do so is to advance the pinko progressive agenda which has made our productive members of society tax slaves to those enjoying the ride on Obamas free-cheese wagon.
Only a progressive snake who ignores the intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted would agree to cut veterans benefits, especially when our nations veterans have not only put their lives on the line for our country, but millions have become disabled in the process.
Let us work to remove this progressive snake from office this coming election and replace him with one who not only supports our nations military, but will work to end free government cheese which is destroying our country from within.
JWK
Reaching across the aisle and bipartisanship is Washington Newspeak to subvert the Constitution and screw the American People.
A politician who cuts spending is generally called a "conservative," not a "progressive."
Hope that lesson in Political Science 101 helped you.
You opinion is noted, especially your absurd reference to political science 101 in which you fail to take into account being obedient to our Constitution is a fundamental hallmark of one who works to conserve our constitutionally limited system of government.
JWK
They are not liberals. They are conniving Marxist parasites who use the cloak of government force to steal the wealth which wage earners, business and investors have worked to create
Great idea. Let;s get rid of all those government workers that are being paid taxpayers hard earned money. Let's shut down the FAA. After all the airlines will service their planes in a timely manner. Then we shut down the Park Service. Who needs national parks? They are just a waste. Then let's shutdown the FDA. The drug companies can be trusted to put out safe products and think of the money saved not checking food being shipped into this country. Oh, and as for the military, they should be the first one to have their pensions taken from them. After all, THEY WERE PAID WHILE THEY WERE ON THE JOB. THEY SHOULD HAVE PUT MONEY AWAY TO PREPARE FOR THEIR RETIREMENT LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. And so on with ALL the government agencies.Hey folks, its gonna take hard decisions to fix this fiscal mess.
Bottom line is this, and it may be uncomfortable: All government employees raised their hands, and said "I want to work for taxpayer money", and accepted all the perks of government work.
Well......We The Taxpayer are broke. We can no longer afford sweetheart 20 year retirement, full benefits for life for a whole family, guaranteed raises and promotions. The real world doesn't work like that.
A true conservative knows a business mind is NOT emotional or sentimental. Cold, hard choices must be made. Welfare and food stamps must be cut. Medicare stuff too. And sorry, but yes, time for us to cut the military spending down to a level the taxpayer can live with. Its a business decision.
Good for Paul. Get emotion out of it. We cant afford this anymore.
Then when hundreds of thousands of people find themselves on the streets with no money, no health care, no food, no shelter, and no chance for a job they can die and decrease the surplus population. The important thing is not the people who work for the government or the work they perform, IT IS THE BOTTOM LINE!
(Did I get it right? Have I captured the spirit of your post?)
Great idea. Let;s get rid of all those government workers that are being paid taxpayers hard earned money. Let's shut down the FAA. After all the airlines will service their planes in a timely manner. Then we shut down the Park Service. Who needs national parks? They are just a waste. Then let's shutdown the FDA. The drug companies can be trusted to put out safe products and think of the money saved not checking food being shipped into this country. Oh, and as for the military, they should be the first one to have their pensions taken from them. After all, THEY WERE PAID WHILE THEY WERE ON THE JOB. THEY SHOULD HAVE PUT MONEY AWAY TO PREPARE FOR THEIR RETIREMENT LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. And so on with ALL the government agencies.Hey folks, its gonna take hard decisions to fix this fiscal mess.
Bottom line is this, and it may be uncomfortable: All government employees raised their hands, and said "I want to work for taxpayer money", and accepted all the perks of government work.
Well......We The Taxpayer are broke. We can no longer afford sweetheart 20 year retirement, full benefits for life for a whole family, guaranteed raises and promotions. The real world doesn't work like that.
A true conservative knows a business mind is NOT emotional or sentimental. Cold, hard choices must be made. Welfare and food stamps must be cut. Medicare stuff too. And sorry, but yes, time for us to cut the military spending down to a level the taxpayer can live with. Its a business decision.
Good for Paul. Get emotion out of it. We cant afford this anymore.
Then when hundreds of thousands of people find themselves on the streets with no money, no health care, no food, no shelter, and no chance for a job they can die and decrease the surplus population. The important thing is not the people who work for the government or the work they perform, IT IS THE BOTTOM LINE!
(Did I get it right? Have I captured the spirit of your post?)
No. You have emotional sarcasm in that, and that's not my stance.
My stance is this: When it comes to people who work for tax money, you must deal with them with NO emotion or sentiment.
We are broke, Taxed Enough Already. That's the fact.
We must cut, and cut a lot. That goes for all government employees, AND those living off welfare handouts.
Does it suck? Yes. The welfare queen is gonna have to get less, the Navy SEAL is gonna have to get less, the DMV worker will get less, the "disabled" construction worker will get less.
Its tax money, not a scholarship. No emotion, no sentiment. Just balance the tax money. That's all.
If they don't like that compensation, quit the job you volunteered for. Others will step up and take it.
Great idea. Let;s get rid of all those government workers that are being paid taxpayers hard earned money. Let's shut down the FAA. After all the airlines will service their planes in a timely manner. Then we shut down the Park Service. Who needs national parks? They are just a waste. Then let's shutdown the FDA. The drug companies can be trusted to put out safe products and think of the money saved not checking food being shipped into this country. Oh, and as for the military, they should be the first one to have their pensions taken from them. After all, THEY WERE PAID WHILE THEY WERE ON THE JOB. THEY SHOULD HAVE PUT MONEY AWAY TO PREPARE FOR THEIR RETIREMENT LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. And so on with ALL the government agencies.
Then when hundreds of thousands of people find themselves on the streets with no money, no health care, no food, no shelter, and no chance for a job they can die and decrease the surplus population. The important thing is not the people who work for the government or the work they perform, IT IS THE BOTTOM LINE!
(Did I get it right? Have I captured the spirit of your post?)
No. You have emotional sarcasm in that, and that's not my stance.
My stance is this: When it comes to people who work for tax money, you must deal with them with NO emotion or sentiment.
We are broke, Taxed Enough Already. That's the fact.
We must cut, and cut a lot. That goes for all government employees, AND those living off welfare handouts.
Does it suck? Yes. The welfare queen is gonna have to get less, the Navy SEAL is gonna have to get less, the DMV worker will get less, the "disabled" construction worker will get less.
Its tax money, not a scholarship. No emotion, no sentiment. Just balance the tax money. That's all.
If they don't like that compensation, quit the job you volunteered for. Others will step up and take it.
except for the simple fact that contracts were already made to veterans. You give us 20, we take care of you & yours for life. Those are called broken promises & violation of contracts. What Paul Ryan did was absurd and a stab in the back to all military veterans. With the democrats who went with it, we already knew they never had ours, so it wasn't shocking.
Our people are our number 1 weapon system. Not the nukes, not stealth, not drones, etc. Our people. It was as true back in Patton's time as it is now.
johnwk and the other far right RINOs are running around in circles.
johnwk and the other far right RINOs are running around in circles.
Anyone who is a conservative agrees, or else they're libtards in denial.
Its simple math. We have this much tax money to give (A). Those who work for tax money want this much (B).
A is < than B.
Period.
Which means EVERYONE in group B must take a loss. Congressmen. DMV workers. SEALS. Marines. Welfare queens. Retirees. Ditch diggers. They all consume tax money, and We The Taxpayer don't have anymore.
No emotion. No sentimentality. Just math.
johnwk and the other far right RINOs are running around in circles.
Anyone who is a conservative agrees, or else they're libtards in denial.
Its simple math. We have this much tax money to give (A). Those who work for tax money want this much (B).
A is < than B.
Period.
Which means EVERYONE in group B must take a loss. Congressmen. DMV workers. SEALS. Marines. Welfare queens. Retirees. Ditch diggers. They all consume tax money, and We The Taxpayer don't have anymore.
No emotion. No sentimentality. Just math.
No real conservative believes that. We start with cutting DOD by 50% in ten years. We cut all tax favors to business, big and small. We SS taxes in the SS fund only. We begin public works programs for those on assistance.
We think and act smart.
Besides, they all say they don't do it for the money anyway. If they are telling the truth, then taking a cut wont affect them much anyway.
johnwk and the other far right RINOs are running around in circles.
Anyone who is a conservative agrees, or else they're libtards in denial.
Its simple math. We have this much tax money to give (A). Those who work for tax money want this much (B).
A is < than B.
Period.
Which means EVERYONE in group B must take a loss. Congressmen. DMV workers. SEALS. Marines. Welfare queens. Retirees. Ditch diggers. They all consume tax money, and We The Taxpayer don't have anymore.
No emotion. No sentimentality. Just math.
No real conservative believes that. We start with cutting DOD by 50% in ten years. We cut all tax favors to business, big and small. We SS taxes in the SS fund only. We begin public works programs for those on assistance.
We think and act smart.
Anyone who is a conservative agrees, or else they're libtards in denial.
Its simple math. We have this much tax money to give (A). Those who work for tax money want this much (B).
A is < than B.
Period.
Which means EVERYONE in group B must take a loss. Congressmen. DMV workers. SEALS. Marines. Welfare queens. Retirees. Ditch diggers. They all consume tax money, and We The Taxpayer don't have anymore.
No emotion. No sentimentality. Just math.
No real conservative believes that. We start with cutting DOD by 50% in ten years. We cut all tax favors to business, big and small. We SS taxes in the SS fund only. We begin public works programs for those on assistance.
We think and act smart.
Im ok with cutting DoD/military 50% in ten years. Some treat it as a sacred cow. But, take the emotion and sentiment out. Its more government employees. They are subject to cuts as tax dollars require like everyone else.
A "tax favor" to business is different. Its not a government TAKING money. Its allowing a company to NOT PAY a tax. That Im ok with. It helps business. Im ok with government telling a business they don't have to pay full taxes. Hell, make that lower rate the rate for ALL business.
But, all the people living their lives off tax money taken from us? No. No matter who it is, they are living off tax money, and they must accept whatever shortage comes now.
And as always the far left only wants to make deep cuts in the military which it's funding is supported by the constitution.
And as always the far left only wants to make deep cuts in the military which it's funding is supported by the constitution.
