Rep. Paul Ryan gives finger to veterans--confirms he is a progressive snake!

I understand the GOP had to compromise to work with the evil Democraps, but this is twice that Ryan has attacked the military/Vets with cuts going back to the sequester bullshit.

I will campaign against him in Iowa if he runs for the GOP nominee in 2016.
 
I understand the GOP had to compromise to work with the evil Democraps, but this is twice that Ryan has attacked the military/Vets with cuts going back to the sequester bullshit.

I will campaign against him in Iowa if he runs for the GOP nominee in 2016.

And that is what it's about...getting rid of these lying snakes who portray themselves as being loyal to our written Constitution and pretend they are "conservatives".

It's time to end the reach-across-the-aisle crap and elect true patriots who will use their office of public trust to confine our federal government within the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government.


JWK


.

Reaching across the aisle and bipartisanship is Washington Newspeak to subvert the Constitution and screw the American People.

 
A politician who cuts spending is generally called a "conservative," not a "progressive."


Hope that lesson in Political Science 101 helped you.

You opinion is noted, especially your absurd reference to political science 101 in which you fail to take into account being obedient to our Constitution is a fundamental hallmark of one who works to conserve our constitutionally limited system of government.

JWK




They are not “liberals”. They are conniving Marxist parasites who use the cloak of government force to steal the wealth which wage earners, business and investors have worked to create


The Constitution says nothing about COLA adjustments. Nor does it say military spending always must rise.

I hope this lesson in Political Science 101 helped.


And now for your lesson in constitutional law 101.


Military spending is authorized by our written constitution ___ it is a constitutionally authorized function of our federal government! In addition, Congress is authorized by our Constitution to make all laws necessary and proper to carry out its constitutionally authorized functions. As such, Congress has adopted a financial incentive for those who serve in our military and is within Congress' powers to set such "public policy".

On the other hand, there is no constitutionally authorized power delegated to our federal government to finance Obama's countless welfare programs. If cuts are needed, and indeed they are, it is Ryan's duty to start cutting from Obama's free-cheese-wagon.


JWK



If we can make 51 percent of America’s population dependent upon an Obama, welfare, food stamp, section 8 housing, college loan check, and now free Obamacare along with FREE BACON we can blackmail them for their vote, keep ourselves in power and keep the remaining portion of America’s productive population enslaved to pay the bills ____ Obama’s Marxist Free Stuff Party, which is designed to establish a federal plantation and redistribute the wealth which wage earners, business and investors have worked to create.
 
Anyone who is a conservative agrees, or else they're libtards in denial.

Its simple math. We have this much tax money to give (A). Those who work for tax money want this much (B).

A is < than B.

Period.

Which means EVERYONE in group B must take a loss. Congressmen. DMV workers. SEALS. Marines. Welfare queens. Retirees. Ditch diggers. They all consume tax money, and We The Taxpayer don't have anymore.

No emotion. No sentimentality. Just math.

No real conservative believes that. We start with cutting DOD by 50% in ten years. We cut all tax favors to business, big and small. We SS taxes in the SS fund only. We begin public works programs for those on assistance.

We think and act smart.

Im ok with cutting DoD/military 50% in ten years. Some treat it as a sacred cow. But, take the emotion and sentiment out. Its more government employees. They are subject to cuts as tax dollars require like everyone else.

A "tax favor" to business is different. Its not a government TAKING money. Its allowing a company to NOT PAY a tax. That Im ok with. It helps business. Im ok with government telling a business they don't have to pay full taxes. Hell, make that lower rate the rate for ALL business.

But, all the people living their lives off tax money taken from us? No. No matter who it is, they are living off tax money, and they must accept whatever shortage comes now.

so you're OK with Obama sending troops to fight in Afghanistan with their hands tied.....get maimed and killed....and then come back here and have Obama along with pinheads like Ryan stab them again...? you're OK with the military who ALREADY SIGNED UP & SERVED to have their understood benefits cut midstream...? it's one thing to know bennies are cut back before you sign up but totally different to have them cut during ongoing service...do you think Congress would agree to THEIR bennies being cut like that....? never happen...:mad:

pinheads like Ryan may be good with accounting to cut the bottom line but to agree to stab our military in the back in order to COMPROMISE with the Demonrats is downright stupid.....when will guys like Ryan ever realize that the Demonrat goal is to incrementally destroy our military one COMPROMISE at a time....? this really comes down to compromising our principles once again....

this is especially egregious when you realize that a cut could easily have been made in a number of other ways.....plenty of waste to cut....or like the Roby-Fitzpatrick plan being proposed which will save the same $7 Billion by closing a loophole that lets illegal aliens get the Refundable Child Tax Credit....but of course Demonrats will cry foul about this because one of THEIR principles is to promote illegal aliens....

which would you cut first.......the military or the illegal aliens.....?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top