Remember Who We Are

[Lisa558]

perhaps you are unaware the AAA has outlawed antisemitism Lisa

~S~

Then why is it tolerated to this extent, and even promoted by the Left?

 

[gipper]

I oppose the genocide committed by Hamas.

Apparently you don’t know the definition of genocide. Could you really be so dumb?

 

[sparky]

Then why is it tolerated to this extent, and even promoted by the Left?

well the left simply doesn't recognize the law Lisa

they believe they can speak badly about anyone

not so under the AAA

~S~

 

[PoliticalChic]

Tell the number of Israel’s murdered since 1948 by Palestinians?

Now tell me the number of Palestinians killed by Israel’s?

Who’s land was confiscated and who is the aggressor?

I apologize in advance as the following will be well beyond your ken.

The Islamic faith is and has always been savage, while the Judeo-Christian one gave us Western Civilization.



So you are a lying windbag, huh?



Entering modernity is a characteristic of every iteration of the Judeo-Christian faith. The very opposite is true of Islam. Muhammad preached loyalty and enmity, and the method was, and is, jihad.

Islam deified tribalism, making it impossible for the faithful to move away from the savagery and blood lust of their 7th century predecessors.

A fundamental truth for Muslims is that there are only two tribes, the Islamic faithful of the umma in one tent, and everyone else in the other. The faithful are taught to attack and subjugate the other ‘tribe.’



“This dichotomized worldview remains enshrined in Islamic law’s, or sharia’s, mandate that Dar al-Islam (the Abode of Islam) must battle Dar al-Kufr (the Abode of Infidelity) in perpetuity until the firmer subsumes the latter.

…to break with tribalism, for Muslims, is to break with Muhammad and his laws…”
Raymond Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 4-5





Were Muhammad’s converts infused with this doctrine of monotheism…or was there another aspect that attracted them. According to Raymond Ibraham, in “The Sword and the Scimitar,” “The appeal of Muhammad’s message lay in its compatibility with the tribal mores of his society….enmity for other tribes, and raids on the latter to enrich and empower the former….The tribe was what humanity is to modern people: to be a part of it was to be treated humanely; to be outside of it was to be treated inhumanely.”

Muslim philosopher Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406) gives insight into the attractiveness of Muhammad’s doctrine: “The early Arab response to civilization was savage. Ibn Khaldun drew a contrast between two conquests of Persia, the Greek and the Arab, as conquests by two powers at different levels of civilization. Unlike the relatively more advanced Greeks who incorporated and built on the scientific advances of the Persians, the relatively backward Arabs destroyed these: …There is an upside to savagery: “since desert life no doubt is the source of bravery, savage groups are braver than others.”64 But there is also a downside: “It is their nature to plunder.”
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/johs.12148

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ok, who said you did and what does that have to do with my post?

I try to avoid posts that are written with such.

I expect adult level articulation.

 

[eagle1462010]

I apologize in advance as the following will be well beyond your ken.

The Islamic faith is and has always been savage, while the Judeo-Christian one gave us Western Civilization.



So you are a lying windbag, huh?



Entering modernity is a characteristic of every iteration of the Judeo-Christian faith. The very opposite is true of Islam. Muhammad preached loyalty and enmity, and the method was, and is, jihad.

Islam deified tribalism, making it impossible for the faithful to move away from the savagery and blood lust of their 7th century predecessors.

A fundamental truth for Muslims is that there are only two tribes, the Islamic faithful of the umma in one tent, and everyone else in the other. The faithful are taught to attack and subjugate the other ‘tribe.’



“This dichotomized worldview remains enshrined in Islamic law’s, or sharia’s, mandate that Dar al-Islam (the Abode of Islam) must battle Dar al-Kufr (the Abode of Infidelity) in perpetuity until the firmer subsumes the latter.

…to break with tribalism, for Muslims, is to break with Muhammad and his laws…”
Raymond Ibrahim, “The Sword And The Scimitar,” p. 4-5





Were Muhammad’s converts infused with this doctrine of monotheism…or was there another aspect that attracted them. According to Raymond Ibraham, in “The Sword and the Scimitar,” “The appeal of Muhammad’s message lay in its compatibility with the tribal mores of his society….enmity for other tribes, and raids on the latter to enrich and empower the former….The tribe was what humanity is to modern people: to be a part of it was to be treated humanely; to be outside of it was to be treated inhumanely.”

Muslim philosopher Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406) gives insight into the attractiveness of Muhammad’s doctrine: “The early Arab response to civilization was savage. Ibn Khaldun drew a contrast between two conquests of Persia, the Greek and the Arab, as conquests by two powers at different levels of civilization. Unlike the relatively more advanced Greeks who incorporated and built on the scientific advances of the Persians, the relatively backward Arabs destroyed these: …There is an upside to savagery: “since desert life no doubt is the source of bravery, savage groups are braver than others.”64 But there is also a downside: “It is their nature to plunder.”
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/johs.12148

Aka they dont adapt to other cultures well.

Another good reason to throw his ass out.

 

[PoliticalChic]

.

We have some Freedoms and Power here <--- In the States

Not every place in the Middle East is a terrible place ... But they are not short of terrible places.
In a lot of those places ... It doesn't matter what the People think ... The folks in charge with the guns ...
Decide what is going to happen ... And even Freedom of movement is severely restricted.

I am currently in the States ... Well, for two more days anyway ...
Then I am headed to a different third world country ... Where they tend to be a lot nicer ...

.​

I've spent time in Jordan, Egypt and Israel.

I tend to agree with Obama about the beauty of the call to prayer, the adhan.

I never made any such generalization about the people in any of those places, nor called it a terrible place.

You wrote "We have some Freedoms and Power here" in comparison to Americans in your post.

So "here" isn't another country?

Name a country that is nicer than America.

 

[BlackSand]

Then why is it tolerated to this extent, and even promoted by the Left?

.

Well ... Because like it not ... Execution of a Law ...
Is always dependent upon an enforcement mechanism.

Those enforcement mechanisms ... Are generally controlled by a governmental entity ...
And guess what ... When they are granted unlimited power ... They'll start making shit up ...

....

The only problem is ... The People that think the Government can actually protect them ...
Without taking everything they can from the People ... As far as Liberties are concerned.

It's even more amusing when the People start arguing with each other about the Courts ...
Like the Courts aren't a governmental entity ... And at least a part of the enforcement mechanisms.

....

Sometimes it helps to just breathe ...
And be Thankful that not everyone is as bad as they could be ...

.​

 

[Lisa558]

well the left simply doesn't recognize the law Lisa

they believe they can speak badly about anyone

not so under the AAA

~S~

What’s AAA?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Aka they dont adapt to other cultures well.

Another good reason to throw his ass out.

"adopt" is not in the Muslim vocabulary. Nor is "assimilate."

Conquer is.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Aka they dont adapt to other cultures well.

Another good reason to throw his ass out.

Words are not the same as actions.

 

[Lisa558]

Words are not the same as actions.

Using words to incite violence is not protected speech.

 

[irosie91]

no you didn't----you denied the fact that the vast majority
of Gazans support the actions of your cohort on October 7
2024. Your answer was vile sophistry

buttercup has DENIED my statement above---effectively
CLAIMING that Hamas and the October 7 festivities that
she adores are rejected by the people of Gaza---watta joke

 

[buttercup]

Just to let you know, I'm a big supporter of Israel.

I know, and because of that and also because it's off topic, I chose to not continue that discussion with that person who wanted to go back and forth with me on it.

Plus, it's an extremely controversial topic, that I have learned first hand causes some posters to go off the deep end and act in the ugliest, most vicious and underhanded ways. So once in a while I post on those threads, but not often. Like you, I prefer civil discussion, without vulgarity and nastiness.

 

[irosie91]

Sooo.....how do you manage to come across as a blowhard and a jerk?

Must take a lot of practice, huh?

I come across so IN YOUR opinion because I do not
lick your shit

 

[BlackSand]

So "here" isn't another country?

Name a country that is nicer than America.

.

Why would I ... I didn't say there was a nicer place ...
Even as screwed up as America can be at times.

I said ... Americans have the luxury to think whatever they want ...
Because it is a nicer place when shit is not blowing up around you ...
And you can think about something other than trying to live through the day ...

....

As to your other comments ... Been to Jordan and Israel ...
But a few more places than that ... And I wasn't eating lunch at cafe in those places ...

.​

 

[eagle1462010]

"adopt" is not in the Muslim vocabulary. Nor is "assimilate."

Conquer is.

So why da fuck should we keep letting them in????

We shouldnt. They intend to change us from within.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I know, and because of that and also because it's off topic, I chose to not continue that discussion with that person who wanted to go back and forth with me on it.

Plus, it's an extremely controversial topic, that I have learned first hand causes some posters to go off the deep end and act in the ugliest, most vicious and underhanded ways. So once in a while I post on those threads, but not often. Like you, I prefer civil discussion, without vulgarity and nastiness.

I appreciate your consideration, but I would never want to object to anything "off topic." If I felt the desire I could respond or not.
Please do whatever you feel at the moment.....it is free speech.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I know, and because of that and also because it's off topic, I chose to not continue that discussion with that person who wanted to go back and forth with me on it.

Plus, it's an extremely controversial topic, that I have learned first hand causes some posters to go off the deep end and act in the ugliest, most vicious and underhanded ways. So once in a while I post on those threads, but not often. Like you, I prefer civil discussion, without vulgarity and nastiness.

BTW, I never mind going head to head on the topic of Israel.

 

[Lisa558]

So why da fuck should we keep letting them in????

We shouldnt. They intend to change us from within.

Even more…..why da fuck should we have to keep them here if they’re foreigners and ginning up hate for and violence against Jews, and in a setting already rife with virrulent antisemitism?

Just how much assault and harassment are Jewish kids supposed to take in order to protect the “right” of a Syrian Muslim and HAMAS supporter, here on a temporary visa, to make things even worse for them?