Remember When Voter Suppression Was a Bad Thing?

[Auld Phart]

Trump to be left off 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns, Washington State says

Far left wing extremist Democrat Washington state legislators have voted to take President Trump off of the 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns. This is just another attempt by the totally corrupt and dishonest Democrats to suppress the vote and steal elections. Democrats can’t win fairly, so they always have to cheat.

And by "cheat" you mean codify the rules that everybody has played by for the last 40 years.

And by "cheat" you mean codify the rules that everybody has played by for the last 40 years.

There's been a rule, for the last 40 years, that candidates had to show their tax returns?


Where?

no rule will,,,just honest folks had no problems showing ,,,you get it yet ?? lol

no rule.

got it.

thanks

 

[occupied]

How is that voter suppression?

keeping Trump off of the ballet is 100% voter suppression for his supporters

He can be on the ballot if he releases his tax returns, like any other candidate. Since every other candidate has done this voluntarily for the last 40 years, this is not an undue or unfair burden on Trump.

You don't understand the law.
President Trump doesn't have to show his tax returns to run for president.

Well there's a law now, what's a tax cheat to do?

 

[LiberalSnowflake]

How is that voter suppression?

keeping Trump off of the ballet is 100% voter suppression for his supporters

He can be on the ballot if he releases his tax returns, like any other candidate. Since every other candidate has done this voluntarily for the last 40 years, this is not an undue or unfair burden on Trump.

You don't understand the law.
President Trump doesn't have to show his tax returns to run for president.

The law requires any candidate who runs in Washington to release their tax returns. I know of the issue independently, so you are likely reading a very biased source if you have another impression.

There's been a rule, for the last 40 years, that candidates had to show their tax returns?


Where?

Don't play dumb. It was a norm/standard that every candidate from a major party releases their tax returns. Both Democrats and Republicans did this. It's just the way things were for 40 years. Trump bucked that rule.

Some places liked that standard so they are codifying it into law. This is no biggie.

 

[Auld Phart]

How is that voter suppression?

keeping Trump off of the ballet is 100% voter suppression for his supporters

He can be on the ballot if he releases his tax returns, like any other candidate. Since every other candidate has done this voluntarily for the last 40 years, this is not an undue or unfair burden on Trump.

You don't understand the law.
President Trump doesn't have to show his tax returns to run for president.

The law requires any candidate who runs in Washington to release their tax returns. I know of the issue independently, so you are likely reading a very biased source if you have another impression.

There's been a rule, for the last 40 years, that candidates had to show their tax returns?


Where?

Don't play dumb. It was a norm/standard that every candidate from a major party releases their tax returns. Both Democrats and Republicans did this. It's just the way things were for 40 years. Trump bucked that rule.

Some places liked that standard so they are codifying it into law. This is no biggie.

But....

no rule?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Trump to be left off 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns, Washington State says

Far left wing extremist Democrat Washington state legislators have voted to take President Trump off of the 2020 ballots unless he shows his tax returns. This is just another attempt by the totally corrupt and dishonest Democrats to suppress the vote and steal elections. Democrats can’t win fairly, so they always have to cheat.

And by "cheat" you mean codify the rules that everybody has played by for the last 40 years.

And by "cheat" you mean codify the rules that everybody has played by for the last 40 years.

There's been a rule, for the last 40 years, that candidates had to show their tax returns?


Where?

no rule will,,,just honest folks had no problems showing ,,,you get it yet ?? lol

The IRS doesn't have a problem with is tax returns.

 

[Rambunctious]

Geeee what are they so afraid of?...they must know Trump will win again....

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

How is that voter suppression?

keeping Trump off of the ballet is 100% voter suppression for his supporters

He can be on the ballot if he releases his tax returns, like any other candidate. Since every other candidate has done this voluntarily for the last 40 years, this is not an undue or unfair burden on Trump.

You don't understand the law.
President Trump doesn't have to show his tax returns to run for president.

Well there's a law now, what's a tax cheat to do?

it will not survive the courts

 

[LiberalSnowflake]

But....

no rule?

Yes rule. Informal rule.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I’m so old I remember when Hillary said voter suppression cost her the election.

Washington State Joins New Jersey In Trying To Keep Trump Off Its 2020 Ballot.

Its just ensuring transparency of presidential candidates; nothing at all to do with voters.

No problem for Trump to be on the ballot after tax returns made available. But doing this in blue states is like pissing in the ocean. Requiring tax returns needs to be done in the purple states.

Well, Brownshiter, that’s up to voters.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Oh well, sucks to be a tax evader running for president.

Obama let Trump skip taxes!

 

[Auld Phart]

But....

no rule?

Yes rule. Informal rule.

Informal rule?

Like...

candidates had to be male and white to be on the ballot?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Not voter suppression.

What are the requirements to run for President, fuckhead?

 

[Crepitus]

I’m so old I remember when Hillary said voter suppression cost her the election.

Washington State Joins New Jersey In Trying To Keep Trump Off Its 2020 Ballot.

This is not voter suppression.

Candidate suppression maybe, but no voters are being suppressed.

 

[Crepitus]

Not voter suppression.

What are the requirements to run for President, fuckhead?

Honesty should be a big one.......

 

[LiberalSnowflake]

it will not survive the courts

Informal rule?

Like...

candidates had to be male and white to be on the ballot?

Yes. But that's bad rule. Also violates equal protection clause when codified.

Tax return = transparency. Seeing tax returns = good rule.

 

[Weatherman2020]

But....

no rule?

Yes rule. Informal rule.

Let’s have States make

I’m so old I remember when Hillary said voter suppression cost her the election.

Washington State Joins New Jersey In Trying To Keep Trump Off Its 2020 Ballot.

This is not voter suppression.

Candidate suppression maybe, but no voters are being suppressed.

Then you have no issue of elimination of all Democrats from the ballot.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I’m so old I remember when Hillary said voter suppression cost her the election.

Washington State Joins New Jersey In Trying To Keep Trump Off Its 2020 Ballot.

We need to start suppressing votes again. Start making sure only white non-commies get to vote.



.

 

[occupied]

How is that voter suppression?

keeping Trump off of the ballet is 100% voter suppression for his supporters

He can be on the ballot if he releases his tax returns, like any other candidate. Since every other candidate has done this voluntarily for the last 40 years, this is not an undue or unfair burden on Trump.

You don't understand the law.
President Trump doesn't have to show his tax returns to run for president.

Well there's a law now, what's a tax cheat to do?

it will not survive the courts

Sure it will, the states have the exclusive right to run their elections. Something the red states absolutely count on to actually suppress voters.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

How is that voter suppression?

keeping Trump off of the ballet is 100% voter suppression for his supporters

He can be on the ballot if he releases his tax returns, like any other candidate. Since every other candidate has done this voluntarily for the last 40 years, this is not an undue or unfair burden on Trump.

It is not required by Federal Law, so you do know this stunt is just nonsense!

 

[Weatherman2020]

it will not survive the courts

Informal rule?

Like...

candidates had to be male and white to be on the ballot?

Yes. But that's bad rule. Also violates equal protection clause when codified.

Tax return = transparency. Seeing tax returns = good rule.

No Democrats on the ballot if a Republican Governor is in office.