Released Transcripts PROVE DOJ LIED IN ROGER STONE CASE – Had No Proof Russia Gave Emails to WikiLeaks

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,076
2,645
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -
I guess we should put you in prison for nothing and see if you give a flying fuck... Moron
 
Even Roger Stones case was a sham lie.... Damn!! They set him up too...

Dupe, Stone was convicted in the court of law. If he had any case at all he would take it up there or file an appeal.

This bullshit is nothing but PR push to lay the ground for Trump's self-serving pardons.
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.
We're gonna hold the MSM very accountable as well.
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -

U don't care huh Siete? Not ready to come into the light yet huh?
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -

U don't care huh Siete? Not ready to come into the light yet huh?
You can see the pain in their eyes
reflected through their pathetic media and representatives.

Look at Fox - all happy , positive attitudes and all the rest are angry, doom and gloom dishonest liars with no souls. Same with Congress.
 
Dupe, Stone was convicted in the court of law.
....and evidence coming out now exposes the government as having set up Flynn, Stone, and others. Evidence shows convictions / verdicts Mueller and the criminal Obama administration got weren't / aren't worth the TP Barry uses to wipe his backside.
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.
We're gonna hold the MSM very accountable as well.
Right. Good luck with that lance Don Quixote.
1589216785745.png
 
Last edited:
Dupe, Stone was convicted in the court of law.
....and evidence coming out now exposes the government as having set up Flynn, Stone, and others. Evidence shows convictions / verdicts Mueller and the criminal Obama administration got weren't / aren't worth the TP Barry uses to wipe his backside.

You say that but as we have long ago established YOU DON'T EVER KNOW WTF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

You simply copy-paste rightwing bullshit mills with ZERO critical understanding of the matters.
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -

U don't care huh Siete? Not ready to come into the light yet huh?
You can see the pain in their eyes
reflected through their pathetic media and representatives.

Look at Fox - all happy , positive attitudes and all the rest are angry, doom and gloom dishonest liars with no souls. Same with Congress.

and theirs -

 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -

U don't care huh Siete? Not ready to come into the light yet huh?
You can see the pain in their eyes
reflected through their pathetic media and representatives.

Look at Fox - all happy , positive attitudes and all the rest are angry, doom and gloom dishonest liars with no souls. Same with Congress.

and theirs -

Hawaii. The bluest state in the US.
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -

U don't care huh Siete? Not ready to come into the light yet huh?
You can see the pain in their eyes
reflected through their pathetic media and representatives.

Look at Fox - all happy , positive attitudes and all the rest are angry, doom and gloom dishonest liars with no souls. Same with Congress.

and theirs -

Hawaii. The bluest state in the US.


and the most unemployed - AT THE POLLS
 
If you snowflakes can't stick to the topic, following USMB rules, then perhaps you should bugger off. No one is interested in your pathetic attempts to distract from Obama's criminal syndicate imploding / being exposed.
 
Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Illegal Russian Collusion narrative they knew was bogus.

Mueller / The Govt Lied about the Flynn case.

Now you can add their case against Roger Stone:


Stone was indicted in part for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

Newly released documents last week prove Stone didn't lie and did not send documents to wikileaks. Part of Stone's defense was that the DNC server as never hacked.

The DNC, Obama administration, FBI's, and even MUELLER'S claim was that the Russians hacked the DNC server...which the DNC never released to the FBI for them to analyze and verify. In this case of National Security, Obama and the FBI allowed a private company hired by the DNC to do the FBI's job of reportedly analyzing and confirming the Russians hacked the server. ONE PROBLEM: Crowdstrike admitted several months ago it WAS NEVER HIRED BY THE DNC TO ANALYZE THEIR SERVER, THA TTHEY NEVER DID LOOK AT THE SERVER, THEY NEVER CONFIRMED THE BOGUS NARRATIVE OF 'THE RUSSINA HACKE THE DNC SERVER'. Crowdstrike declared the DNC hired their PR DEPARTMENT to help them craft the narrative that it had been hacked.

Stone asked the DOJ to provide the evidence that the hack by Russians was never confirmed. The Obama DOJ refused and instead told him since Mueller had indicted 9 Russians that was proof that the Russians DID hack the DNC server.
-- There is an old saying - 'You can indict a ham sandwich'....it doesn't mean its guilty.....and Mueller's indictment of 9 Russians did not mean they hacked the DNC's server. No evidence was EVER shown proving Russians hacked the DNC's server.....YET ROGER STONE WAS INDICTED BASED ON THE UNSUPPORTED / UNPROVEMN LIE...NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN PRODUCED PROVING THE RUSSIANS HACKED THE DNC SERVER. (The case was DROPPED against the 9 Russians, & no proof was ever shown the did anything....)

---------------------------------------

On January 23, 2019, Stone was indicted for a number of frivolous crimes where he was accused of lying to Congress. Looking at the indictments, Stone had a good case that he did not lie.

Stone claimed that the DNC servers in 2016 were never examined by Crowdstrike and asked for proof that this was the case, because it was pertinent to his case. Stone was indicted for lying to Congress about Russians hacking the DNC and sending the hacked emails to WikiLeaks.

It was uncovered in the Roger Stone case that CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack by Russia which were full of redactions and the FBI just took Crowdstrike’s reports at face value. The FBI never inspected the DNC servers. It was also reported that the DOJ never received the unredacted copies of Crowdstrike’s reports

Stone pressed the DOJ for support that Russia hacked the DNC and sent the emails to WikiLeaks, and the DOJ eventually responded that the investigation of the 12 Russian GRU officers noted in the Mueller investigation gathered evidence that Russia hacked the DNC systems and sent the emails they hacked to WikiLeaks.

The DOJ went on to say that they were not going to provide Stone the data from the GRU case.

we now know Crowdstrike did not confirm Russia’s actions after they ‘hacked’ the DNC. To date there is no evidence that Russia sent emails to WikiLeaks.
It looks like these Deep State actors lied to the court. This is serious.'







.

so who gives a fuk - yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

33 million voters want jobs -

U don't care huh Siete? Not ready to come into the light yet huh?
You can see the pain in their eyes
reflected through their pathetic media and representatives.

Look at Fox - all happy , positive attitudes and all the rest are angry, doom and gloom dishonest liars with no souls. Same with Congress.

and theirs -

Hawaii. The bluest state in the US.


and the most unemployed - AT THE POLLS
Yep. The most unemployed are us retirees. We don't have to work anymore, and we always show up AT THE POLLS. Maybe team trump needs to lighten up on asking us to go for the self sacrificing angle on the open up fast and loose idea, not in our interests.
 

Forum List

Back
Top