Registration of firearms leads to confiscation

[Stann]

An ignorant and ridiculous response.

Second Amendment case law determines how the government regulates and limits that right, such as requiring a permit to carry a concealed firearm – Bruen doesn’t change that fact and is now part of that Second Amendment jurisprudence instructing governments how to regulate and limit the Second Amendment right.

Second Amendment case law is in its infancy and still evolving – it will take years – perhaps decades – before we have a comprehensive understanding of the scope of the Second Amendment right.

It was quite easy to comprehend for the founding fathers. And it doesn't say what you think it says. Very few people know the real intent of the law.

 

[Auld Phart]

Today we have paid law enforcement people that look like they're going to war they're so heavily armed. No posse's necessary or wanted. That idiot coward child in Wisconsin proved that without a doubt.

did you fucking miss "IN the old west,"?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Well lawmakers seem to think that abortion is barbaric and they took away women's right to have them so I think guns are barbaric and they should go by the wayside if humanity is ever going to advance itself forget the law abiding stuff it's not worth it anymore. They technology it's not the same as it was in the old days it's so advanced it's become horrifically dangerous. They shouldn't even be allowed to make these kind of guns anymore except for the police they're the only ones and unmilitary they're the only answers have these horrible weapons. But then again war should be outlawed already, humans are just too stupid for their own good. Time to let the computers rule over us.

Whether it’s abortion or guns – ‘bans’ don’t work; whether it’s ‘banning’ abortion or guns, both are examples of increasing the authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty.

‘Banning’ certain types of firearms or placing more restrictions on firearms is ineffective and pointless.

Solutions need to be explored that address the problem of gun crime and violence that don’t involve the regulation of firearms.

 

[Stann]

did you fucking miss "IN the old west,"?

That's why I said today did you miss that.

 

[Auld Phart]

That's why I said today did you miss that.

thanks for yet another deflection.

come back when you can stay on topic

 

[Stann]

thanks for yet another deflection.

come back when you can stay on topic

What kind of idiot are you ?

 

[Auld Phart]

What kind of idiot are you ?

one that stays on topic

you should try it..


you'll look less of an idiot

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It was quite easy to comprehend for the founding fathers. And it doesn't say what you think it says. Very few people know the real intent of the law.

It was the original intent of the Framers that the courts determine what the Constitution means, to interpret the Constitution through cases brought before the courts, and to establish the case law placing limits on how government regulates or restricts citizens’ rights – including the Second Amendment.

And current Second Amendment case law holds that the Second Amendment safeguards an individual right to possess a handgun pursuant to lawful self-defense unconnected with militia service.

It’s only been 12 years since the Second Amendment was incorporated to the states and local jurisdictions – prior to that it applied solely to the Federal government.

Consequently, the courts have only started to explore the meaning of the Second Amendment, its scope and limitations, as well as limitations as to how state and local governments may regulate and restrict that right.

 

[Stann]

one that stays on topic

you should try it..


you'll look less of an idiot

Listen you idiot
You pointed out about the policies in the old west. I pointed out that in today's world posse's are outdated and not practical I even gave an example. The police are better change and more heavily armed than at any time in history, that's their job.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Perhaps that's why the letter was sent to business owners instead of home owners.

Business owners at liberty to possess firearms, to relocate their firearms to other venues, firearms that have in no manner been ‘confiscated.’

And laws that prohibit firearms in certain locations are perfectly Constitutional – neither infringing upon nor violating the Second Amendment.

 

[Auld Phart]

Listen you idiot
You pointed out about the policies in the old west. I pointed out that in today's world posse's are outdated and not practical I even gave an example. The police are better change and more heavily armed than at any time in history, that's their job.

You pointed out about the policies in the old west.

Because the discussion was about civilian militias

You took off for left field.

I pointed out that in today's world posse's are outdated and not practical I even gave an example.

which has nothing to do with the topic.

I tire of your deflections.



see ya next week

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

why dont we make an example and take away governments guns first

That would be an example of ignorance and stupidity.

 

[Stann]

Because the discussion was about civilian militias

You took off for left field.


which has nothing to do with the topic.

I tire of your deflections.



see ya next week

Like I said civilian malicious have no place in today's world. Join the national guard that's what they were talking about.

 

[Stann]

Like I said civilian malicious have no place in today's world. Join the national guard that's what they were talking about.

If you think a group like the good old boys or whatever they're called, the oath keepers, etc. Are well-regimented militias you are out of your f****** mind.

 

[OKTexas]

Perhaps that's why the letter was sent to business owners instead of home owners.

What makes you think the next round won't be to people with premises permits living in the red zones?

.

 

[OKTexas]

Didnt say it was

Did say the Second Amendment supports the registration of firearms

Feel free to point to that verbiage.

.

 

[OKTexas]

I guess you don't believe in facts or statistics either. Store owners who have guns are 17 times more likely to be shot. The money isn't worth it. Hand it over to the crooks, notify the police and contact your insurance company. That's a best policy to live with.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Biden understands how dangerous RW Terrorists can be

Yeah, so dangerous it takes 30 FBI swat members to arrest a pro-life pastor with his wife and 7 kids in the home. What was his crime, simply pushing a man back that was in his 12 yo sons face cursing him. The asshole tried to sue the pastor and the case was thrown out of court, but now the regime DOJ is pursuing criminal charges, even when there was no physical harm done. So fuck you and your commie propaganda.

.

 

[GLASNOST]

... war should be outlawed already, humans are just too stupid for their own good.

Yes.

Time to let the computers rule over us.

It is the Military-Industrial Complex that rules over us now.

 

[OKTexas]

Either conservatives support “states’ rights” or they don’t.

If the states have the right to force women to give birth against their will, then states likewise have the right to regulate firearms as they see fit.

Conservatives can’t have it both ways.

There is no constitutional right to kill your child, so it was left to the States. There is a constitutional right to keep and bear arms so that isn't. If you weren't so illiterate you'd know that.

.