Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Most violent and property crimes in the U.S. go unsolved
In 2015, 47% of the violent crimes and 35% of the property crimes tracked by the Bureau of Justice Statistics were reported to police.www.pewresearch.org
cherry picking at its finestYour link does not provide data on armed robbery of a business
Not reallycherry picking at its finest
When your car gets stolen or your home is broken into .... you know what I'm going to tell you, right? Making it illegal (and depriving criminals of their livelihood) is an example of the authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty.Whether it’s abortion or guns – ‘bans’ don’t work; whether it’s ‘banning’ abortion or guns, both are examples of increasing the authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty.
Revenge will stir up your existing MAGA crazies, but it won't convince anybody else to join your cult.
the 2 tiered justice system existed long before Biden was president.As usual, you commies are thinking smoke and mirrors can fool the public again, you're wrong.
What you propagandist call revenge, the rest of the country will call justice.
.
--------------..... your existing MAGA crazies .....
This is why the US will never amount to anything. Two opposing idiots arguing over nothing but absurd conclusions. Typical American buffoonery dupped into extremist nonsense.As usual, you commies ..... .
the 2 tiered justice system existed long before Biden was president.
Office of Justice Programs | Office of Justice Programs>abstracts>effects of offender weapon use and victim self-defense in robbery.
I like what the Free State Of Florida Statutes and Constitution has to say about gun registration.When the second amendment is repealed then denying you keeping and bearing arms won't be called infringement. It will be called honouring the Constitution and upholding the law.
View attachment 701363
When the second amendment is repealed then denying you keeping and bearing arms won't be called infringement. It will be called honouring the Constitution and upholding the law.
I am trying to see what it has to do with my post or at least the purpose of yours.I like what the Free State Of Florida Statutes and Constitution has to say about gun registration.
Office of Justice Programs | Office of Justice Programs>abstracts>effects of offender weapon use and victim self-defense in robbery.
From your link:Store owners who have guns are 17 times more likely to be shot.
Registration makes confiscation easier. If you ever manage to do away with the Second Amendment your next goal will be in ban and confiscate civialian owned firearms.I am trying to see what it has to do with my post or at least the purpose of yours.
I'm sure you are right but that isn't the point ..... my point.Registration makes confiscation easier. If you ever manage to do away with the Second Amendment your next goal will be in ban and confiscate civialian owned firearms.
I do side with the idea of eliminating guns but it isn't my plan. No personal offence to you but I don't give a shit if Americans kill each other off to the point of extinction. Keep your guns for all I care. My point is exactly as I stated it. Here it is again:It might be wisest to wait until the old timers die off before you push your plans. The younger generations look a lot more gullible.
So, am I right or am I right? Is what I wrote correct or is it not correct? And if I'm right then your reply with "Statutes and Constitution ..... about gun registration" is totally irrelevant. Your link is intersting and important to know but it is irrelvant to my statment.When the second amendment is repealed then denying you keeping and bearing arms won't be called infringement. It will be called honouring the Constitution and upholding the law.
You could do away with the Second Amendment and people could still own guns. You would then have to pass laws saying civilian gun ownership was illegal. Such laws would not be ruled unconstitutional as there no longer would be a Second Amendment.I'm sure you are right but that isn't the point ..... my point.
I do side with the idea of eliminating guns but it isn't my plan. No personal offence to you but I don't give a shit if Americans kill each other off to the point of extinction. Keep your guns for all I care. My point is exactly as I stated it. Here it is again:
So, am I right or am I right? Is what I wrote correct or is it not correct? And if I'm right then your reply with "Statutes and Constitution ..... about gun registration" is totally irrelevant. Your link is intersting and important to know but it is irrelvant to my statment.
I don't know any crime stats that specifically categorize armed robberies of businessesNot really
Your link does not debunk what I posted
I don't know any crime stats that specifically categorize armed robberies of businesses
Do you?
Armed robbery is armed robbery why don't you produce some stats on " Armed Business robbery" to prove your point?Generic “robbery” does not cut it
Overall, cameras in businesses and in surrounding areas have significantly increased the apprehension of armed robbers
Why would you deny that?
Yes, it must be something like that. But that's the problem - most Americans think that the phrase "shall not be infringed" is written in blood and stone and is above (more or less) the Constitution itself as though anything in the Consitution can be repealed or amended but because of that phrase it can NEVER be changed. Why they do not understand is a mystery. The second amendment is ITSELF an "amendment" so of course it can be amended or repealed!You could do away with the Second Amendment and people could still own guns. You would then have to pass laws saying civilian gun ownership was illegal. Such laws would not be ruled unconstitutional as there no longer would be a Second Amendment.
Yes, it must be something like that. But that's the problem - most Americans think that the phrase "shall not be infringed" is written in blood and stone and is above (more or less) the Constitution itself as though anything in the Consitution can be repealed or amended but because of that phrase it can NEVER be changed. Why they do not understand is a mystery. The second amendment is ITSELF an "amendment" so of course it can be amended or repealed!
Yes, it must be something like that. But that's the problem - most Americans think that the phrase "shall not be infringed" is written in blood and stone and is above (more or less) the Constitution itself as though anything in the Consitution can be repealed or amended
www.archives.gov
