BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 97,325
- 33,207
- 2,250
Ok last time.So, you don't want us to be safer? After all, if you did, you'd advocate for registration, right?
I see. So, instead of basing your position on reality, you want to base it on some ignorant hypothetical?
Good to know...
I'm not saying some wouldn't. I'm saying many wouldn't...
So, in your mind, the rare instance it might help in some way is sufficient to require registration for all?
Okay, so let me make sure I understand:
I own a gun. Someone breaks into my home and somehow manages to steal one of my properly secured firearms. He then goes on a killing spree and then drops of the radar. My stolen firearm is never seen again.
Where in that scenario is there a benefit to the gun being registered to me?
See, if one of my unregistered firearms is ever stolen, I'm notifying the police. I'm giving them every bit of information I can; date and time I think it was stolen, make and model, the serial number of the gun, everything. That's what a responsible gun does.
Sorry, but your argument is wildly unconvincing. There's nothing about what you've said which would make us any safer.
There's only one reason to require gun registration, and it's laughable when liberals try to say it's in the name of safety...
Of course I want us to be safer. I'm just not sure gun registrationis the best way to do that right now.
I'm basing it on the discussion and the question of whether registration could make us safer. It could in some circumstances.
How many wouldn't doesn't matter. Asking if it could help assumes guns are registered. The question wasn't if some guns were registered.
Obviously that would be one scenario where registration wouldn't help. Nothing we do will work as hoped every time. I already said that, you didn't read it?
I never tried to convince you of anything. You're a crazy gun nut. You're immune to logic. I answered your questions.