Registration of firearms leads to confiscation

[bigrebnc1775]

Your thread premise is a lie and most on the dishonest right are liars – particularly when it comes to the regulation of firearms.

You’ve provided no evidence that the registration of firearms results in ‘confiscation’ – that’s a lie.

Firearms in New York City are not being ‘confiscated’ – that’s another lie.

The letter included in your link (a source just as unreliable and dishonest as are conservatives) clearly states that gunowners are at liberty to relocate their firearms to another venue, retaining both possession and ownership of their firearms.

And in contempt of these facts, you continue to propagate your ridiculous lies and slippery slope fallacies.

What will happen if the directions of the NYPD are not followed?

 

[BULLDOG]

What a clumsy, cowardly dodge.

Clearly, you're too stupid to formulate an answer to the question, and you're too big a coward to simply admit that...

Ok. The only question I've seen is how would registration make us safer. I have never advocated for gun registration, and I challenge you to find an example of where I did, but of course registration would make us safer in some circumstances. If a person makes a death threat, it would certainly be important to know if he had a gun registered in his name. Finding the last legal owner of a gun used in a crime could be the first step in finding the perpetrator. There are lots of unquestionable ways a gun registry could make us safer.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Ok. The only question I've seen is how would registration make us safer. I have never advocated for gun registration, and I challenge you to find an example of where I did, but of course registration would make us safer in some circumstances. If a person makes a death threat, it would certainly be important to know if he had a gun registered in his name. Finding the last legal owner of a gun used in a crime could be the first step in finding the perpetrator. There are lots of unquestionable ways a gun registry could make us safer.

What will happen if the directions of the NYPD are not followed?

 

[Canon Shooter]

Why are you being a weeny and not accepting the fact that New York has every legal right to do what they are doing?

Why are you being a retard?

I've never said I don't accept that they have that right. If you believe otherwise, please point me to the post in which I state that. Otherwise, please endeavor to not be a lying scumbag.

I simply asked you how requiring the registration of guns makes anyone safer. You've been a repeated, abject failure at answering that question. You've failed repeatedly.

I've never encountered anyone who enjoys being a complete and utter failure as much as you.

You must really enjoy the taste...

 

[Canon Shooter]

...but of course registration would make us safer in some circumstances.

So, you admit that you advocate gun registration

Good. That's been suspected all along...

If a person makes a death threat, it would certainly be important to know if he had a gun registered in his name.

I own a large number of firearms, and I will never, ever, register any of them. If I threaten someone's life, and the authorities check to see if I have a gun registered in my name, they'll find bupkus.

The fact that my neighbor has his guns registered makes no one safer from my guns, now does it?

Finding the last legal owner of a gun used in a crime could be the first step in finding the perpetrator.

Ah, but the crime's already been committed so, again, the question of safety is moot. Requiring that a gun be registered
didn't stop the commission of the crime, and isn't that what more gun laws are supposed to do?

There are lots of unquestionable ways a gun registry could make us safer.

Well, let's see 'em!

Or are you unable to intelligently articulate what those "unquestionable ways" are?

 

[BULLDOG]

End murder laws let's just have anarchy

That's what your logic calls for.

 

[BULLDOG]

Several times before they already had 'their legal right to do so" nullified at SCOTUS.
Any reason to think it won't happen again?

So now you're a fortune teller. Cool.

 

[BULLDOG]

So what will happen if the business owners do not obey the directive of the NYPD?

No idea.

 

[MagicMike]

sorry, junior.

Militia at that time consisted of a specific group of people..

Males, ages 16-45.

NO females, (of any age),

No males over the age of 45, (in some states, 57).

No one not sound of mind and body.

Which is why the FF gave the right to the people, not the militia,

Sounds like you just make this shit up as you go along.

But there is one good takeaway here.

The need fir CONTROL and REGULATUON built into 2A.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That's what your logic calls for.

It's one way of getting rid of DNC cultists

 

[Mac-7]

So how many drunk drivers do you think respect drunk driving laws. Using your logic, we should just eliminate those laws

Most drivers do not need a law to do the right thing

You assume that anyone with a gun is a criminal

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No idea.

You chickenshit bastard
You know exactly what will happen
Confiscation of those registered fireams

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Most drivers do not need a law to do the right thing

You assume that anyone with a gun is a criminal

He assumes everybody will be a murderer if they end murder laws

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Your intention to help neighbors in need was of pure motive. Please don’t let political corrupted leftists sway your personal decisions to do good in any way! Keep the good fight OPJQ! Your proactive stance is a positive because your eyes and mind are fully opened to the political spewings of those who claim to have good intentions on paper but have collective socialism as the end game plan.

As they say about gun registration, it's the first step in the process of confiscation.

I will not register my garden just to have its produce confiscated. I do quietly grow plenty of extra so that I can share with those in need. I have a wonderful handyman who works so hard and with such dedication on my property and I certainly have plans to keep his family fed, if we hit the food shortages that are predicted. I'm planting foods that his family have requested.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So now you're a fortune teller. Cool.

History tells us so.

 

[rightwinger]

That argument doesn't hold water.

Only if you hate our freedom

 

[rightwinger]

As they say about gun registration, it's the first step in the process of confiscation.

I will not register my garden just to have its produce confiscated. I do quietly grow plenty of extra so that I can share with those in need. I have a wonderful handyman who works so hard and with such dedication on my property and I certainly have plans to keep his family fed, if we hit the food shortages that are predicted. I'm planting foods that his family have requested.

As they say about gun registration
It is the first step to a well regulated militia

 

[Auld Phart]

Sounds like you just make this shit up as you go along.

But there is one good takeaway here.

The need fir CONTROL and REGULATUON built into 2A.

Sounds like you just make this shit up as you go along.

nope, mild research into the subject.

YOu should invest some time into it, so you have an idea of what you're talking abouit.

he need fir CONTROL and REGULATUON built into 2A.

only for militias.

No restrictions on the right of the people to keep and bear arms mentioned in the Second.

 

[BULLDOG]

So, you admit that you advocate gun registration

Good. That's been suspected all along...



I own a large number of firearms, and I will never, ever, register any of them. If I threaten someone's life, and the authorities check to see if I have a gun registered in my name, they'll find bupkus.

The fact that my neighbor has his guns registered makes no one safer from my guns, now does it?



Ah, but the crime's already been committed so, again, the question of safety is moot. Requiring that a gun be registered
didn't stop the commission of the crime, and isn't that what more gun laws are supposed to do?



Well, let's see 'em!

Or are you unable to intelligently articulate what those "unquestionable ways" are?

Try harder.
1 No I didn't advocate gun registration, but I do acknowledge it would make us safer in some instances.
2. Whether your guns are currently registered is not the issue. The question was if they were registered, would it make us safer. If you made death threats, and your guns were registered. that would make a difference. Don't try to dodge and say some wouldn't register their guns. This is about whether registration could make us safer, not if it would in every circumstance.
3. The crime has been committed, and the criminal is still on the street. The last known owner could be the criminal, or he could at least say when and where the gun went missing. That could help find the criminal and get him off the street before he commits another crime.
These are all ways registration would make us safer in some situations. Is there anything that would make us safer in every situation? Of course not.

 

[MagicMike]

nope, mild research into the subject.

YOu should invest some time into it, so you have an idea of what you're talking abouit.




only for militias.

No restrictions on the right of the people to keep and bear arms mentioned in the Second.

Except for the need for being "regulated well."

It's right there IN the text!