What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rediculous: Obama wants to Spend 10.3 Trillion on Wefare.

Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
571
Reaction score
109
Points
0
Location
Mississippi
This is insane. Seriously though. This man is taking severe steps to dismantle the economy at the behest of people who don't work. He wants to wreck the common American worker who pays taxes. What can be done to stop such wasteful spending? We need to end welfare now.


Obama to Spend $10.3 Trillion on Welfare: Uncovering the Full Cost of Means-Tested Welfare or Aid to the Poor | The Heritage Foundation


Since the beginning of the War on Poverty, government has spent vast sums on welfare or aid to the poor; however, the aggregate cost of this assistance is largely unknown because the spending is fragmented into myriad programs.

As this report shows, means-tested welfare or aid to poor and low-income persons is now the third most expen*sive government function. Its cost ranks below support for the elderly through Social Security and Medicare and below government expenditures on education, but above spending on national defense. Prior to the current reces*sion, one dollar in seven in total federal, state, and local government spending went to means-tested welfare.

Means-tested welfare spending or aid to the poor consists of government programs that provide assistance delib*erately and exclusively to poor and lower-income people. By contrast, non-welfare programs provide benefits and services for the general population. For example, food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families are means-tested aid programs that provide benefits only to poor and lower-income persons. On the other hand, Social Security, Medicare, police protection, and public education are not means-tested; they pro*vide services and benefits to persons at all income levels.


In fiscal year (FY) 2008, total government spending on means-tested welfare or aid to the poor amounted to $714 billion. This high level of welfare spending was the result of steady permanent growth in welfare spending over several decades rather than a short-term response to temporary economic conditions.


Of the $714 billion in welfare spending, $522 billion (73 percent) was federal expenditures, and $192 billion (27 percent) was state government funds. Nearly all state government welfare expenditures are required matching contributions to federal welfare programs. These contributions could be considered a "welfare tax" that the federal government imposes on the states. Ignoring these matching state payments into the federal welfare system results in a serious underestimation of spending on behalf of the poor.

Of total means-tested spending in FY 2008, 52 percent was spent on medical care for poor and lower-income persons, and 37 percent was spent on cash, food, and housing aid. The remaining 11 percent was spent on social ser*vices, training, child development, targeted federal education aid, and community development for lower-income persons and communities. Roughly half of means-tested spending goes to disabled or elderly persons. The other half goes to lower-income families with children, most of which are headed by single parents.


Total means-tested welfare spending in FY 2008 amounted to around $16,800 for each poor person in the U.S.; however, some welfare spending goes to individuals who have low incomes but are not below the official poverty line (about $22,200 per year for a family of four). Typically, welfare benefits are received not just by the poor, but also by persons who have incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level ($44,400 per year for a family of four). Around one-third of the U.S. population falls within this lower income range. On average, welfare spending amounts to around $7,000 per year for each individual who is poor or who has an income below 200 percent of the poverty level. This comes to $28,000 per year for each lower-income family of four.


Welfare spending has grown enormously since President Lyndon B. Johnson launched the War on Poverty. Wel*fare spending was 13 times greater in FY 2008, after adjusting for inflation, than it was when the War on Poverty started in 1964. Means-tested welfare spending was 1.2 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) when Presi*dent Johnson began the War on Poverty. In 2008, it reached 5 percent of GDP.


Annual means-tested welfare spending is more than sufficient to eliminate poverty in the United States. The U.S. Census Bureau, which is in charge of measuring poverty and inequality in the nation, defines a family as poor if its annual income falls below official poverty income thresholds. If total means-tested welfare spending were simply converted into cash benefits, the sum would be nearly four times the amount needed to raise the income of all poor families above the official poverty line.


One may reasonably ask how government can spend so much on welfare and still have great inequality and so many people living in apparent poverty. The answer is that the Census ignores nearly the entire welfare system in its measurements. In its conventional reports, the Census counts only 4 percent of total welfare spending as income. Most government discussions of poverty and inequality do not account for the massive transfers of the welfare state.

Since the beginning of the War on Poverty, government has spent $15.9 trillion (in inflation-adjusted 2008 dol*lars) on means-tested welfare. In comparison, the cost of all other wars in U.S. history was $6.4 trillion (in inflation-adjusted 2008 dollars).


In his first two years in office, President Barack Obama will increase annual federal welfare spending by one-third from $522 billion to $697 billion. The combined two-year increase will equal almost $263 billion ($88.2 bil*lion in FY 2009 plus $174.6 billion in FY 2010). After adjusting for inflation, this increase is two and a half times greater than any previous increase in federal welfare spending in U.S. history. As a share of the economy, annual fed*eral welfare spending will rise by roughly 1.2 percent of GDP.

more in link
 
Last edited:

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
222,679
Reaction score
48,456
Points
2,190
Heritage Foundation???



NEXT
 

boedicca

Uppity Water Nymph
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
56,431
Reaction score
19,016
Points
2,250
Location
The Land of Funk
Obama said he was going to spread the wealth around. What did you think he meant?

This welfare is part and parcel with his philosophy.
 

SFC Ollie

Still Marching
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
28,951
Reaction score
7,638
Points
255
Location
Extreme East Ohio
The War on poverty will never be won.


Some 2000 years ago someone wrote down that a teacher at the time said something along the lines of " The Poor will always be with you".

Yes it was written in the Christian Bible, and so far it has held true. Yet we still have people who insist that they can change that.


It will never work.
 

The T

George S. Patton Party
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
48,082
Reaction score
5,533
Points
1,773
Location
What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
The War on poverty will never be won.


Some 2000 years ago someone wrote down that a teacher at the time said something along the lines of " The Poor will always be with you".

Yes it was written in the Christian Bible, and so far it has held true. Yet we still have people who insist that they can change that.


It will never work.

Indeed. it has been with us through man's history. When forced servitude unto others is tried? These people whine liked stuffed pigs when we revolt against the idea.

Jesus gave a choice. Government gives a mandate at the barrel of a gun.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
50,337
Reaction score
10,053
Points
0
The War on poverty will never be won.


Some 2000 years ago someone wrote down that a teacher at the time said something along the lines of " The Poor will always be with you".

Yes it was written in the Christian Bible, and so far it has held true. Yet we still have people who insist that they can change that.


It will never work.

Indeed, the role of the poor is to teach those who are not poor a few lessons.
 

The T

George S. Patton Party
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
48,082
Reaction score
5,533
Points
1,773
Location
What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
The War on poverty will never be won.


Some 2000 years ago someone wrote down that a teacher at the time said something along the lines of " The Poor will always be with you".

Yes it was written in the Christian Bible, and so far it has held true. Yet we still have people who insist that they can change that.


It will never work.

Indeed, the role of the poor is to teach those who are not poor a few lessons.

Indeed. Don't make the same mistakes and force others to pay for it.
 

The Rabbi

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
67,734
Reaction score
7,917
Points
1,840
Location
Nashville
The War on poverty will never be won.
It cannot be because then a lot of bureaucrats would be out of work. And we can't have that.
The "poor" in this country live better than about 80% of the people in the world. How can they still be considered poor?
 

The T

George S. Patton Party
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
48,082
Reaction score
5,533
Points
1,773
Location
What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
The War on poverty will never be won.
It cannot be because then a lot of bureaucrats would be out of work. And we can't have that.
The "poor" in this country live better than about 80% of the people in the world. How can they still be considered poor?

Indeed. And of course the 'poor' are kept that way and in servitude to the politicians that need the votes to keep them there.

Welcome to the 21st Century of Slavery. [Servitude to pay for political ignorence, folly, and debt imposed by our own government].
 

SFC Ollie

Still Marching
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
28,951
Reaction score
7,638
Points
255
Location
Extreme East Ohio
The War on poverty will never be won.
It cannot be because then a lot of bureaucrats would be out of work. And we can't have that.
The "poor" in this country live better than about 80% of the people in the world. How can they still be considered poor?

Well you know, they may not be able to get that Unlimited plan for their cell phone.
 

WillowTree

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
84,532
Reaction score
16,063
Points
2,180

The T

George S. Patton Party
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
48,082
Reaction score
5,533
Points
1,773
Location
What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS

Luissa

Annoying Customer
Joined
Sep 7, 2008
Messages
43,224
Reaction score
6,003
Points
1,785
Location
TARDIS
The War on poverty will never be won.
It cannot be because then a lot of bureaucrats would be out of work. And we can't have that.
The "poor" in this country live better than about 80% of the people in the world. How can they still be considered poor?

Well you know, they may not be able to get that Unlimited plan for their cell phone.

You are taking a few and lumping the in with the rest.:clap2:

Having done caregiving and gone into people's home who were living off of SS and disablity, I can tell you most do not live like Kings, and there are very few perks in their life. I also have a mother who had to quit her job and go on welfare so her husband could get health insurance, he of course couldn't under her plan due to pre existing condition. When her husband died, she went back to work.
I think some people on the right should really get to know some of the people they pre judge.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top