MagicMike
Platinum Member
Republican voters typically don't care if their voting choices wind up screwing over others, as long as it isn't themselves who have to feel the sting. There seems to be quite a disconnect for this voting block between the policies they vote for and any real, down to earth realization about how those policies can personally disrupt their own lives. For instance they'll vote for someone who tells them he's going to impose tariffs on our biggest trading partners not even realizing that those tariffs wind up being nothing more than extra taxes on consumers like themselves. Then when the results of those tariffs wind up coming home to roost and destroying the economies in their rural farming communities they react with shock.
They cannot see that they actually voted to make their own lives worse, not better.
Likewise they'll vote for the very people who actually admit to them AHEAD OF TIME that they're all about reducing these voter's access to affordable healthcare...and they'll STILL vote Republican...probably because they don't believe it's actually THEIR affordable healthcare these Republican politicians are promising to cut, but that of the "others" less deserving than them.
And it is the same with welfare. Poor, white Republican voters historically vote overwhelmingly for the very people who again TELL THEM AHEAD OF TIME how they want to take food out of their mouths by reducing the very public assistance programs these voters depend on because again, being Republican they have a built in sense of entitlement that makes it incompresensible to them that their own welfare dependence is what these Republican politicians they vote into office are targeting. They think the targets are inner city (mostly minority) Democrat voters.
And so here we are.
Republicans are keeping government shut down because Democrats won't let them take away affordable healthcare from the people who ignorantly voted against their own best interest. This shutdown is draggng on even longer than the second longest government shutdown which occurred during Donald Trump's first term. It is dragging on so long that millions and millions of red state Trump voters may have to go hungry for Thanksgiving next month.
This would be a great time for those Republican voters to finally have that long overdue come to Jesus moment about the crazy, self-destructive crap they actually vote for.
Will finally seeing how their own votes are responsible for their own empty stomachs move the needle on their stubbornness this time?
I guess we'll soon see huh?
But what’s unfolding now is more dangerous. Inflation has already thinned grocery budgets, pandemic emergency allotments have expired, and food banks are still recovering from years of record demand. This time, the margin for survival is smaller, and the cruelty more deliberate.
What also makes this crisis different isn’t just the scale of potential hunger, it’s who will feel it. As always, Black, Brown, Indigenous, and disabled communities will be hit first and hardest because poverty in America is still structured by race and ableism. These are the families already juggling inflated grocery prices, wage gaps, and greedy landlords raising rents. They’ve weathered generations of disinvestment, redlining, and political neglect. But what makes this moment distinct is that millions of white, working-class households, many in deep-red counties, are now standing on the same cliff, about to feel the same hunger they once believed was somebody else’s problem.
If the government allows SNAP benefits to run out, the consequences will reach far beyond grocery store shelves. The collapse of the white self-sufficiency myth will hit hardest among many MAGA voters who are older, working-class white Americans in counties that depend heavily on federal aid programs like SNAP, Social Security, Medicare, disability, and farm subsidies. In fact, some of the highest SNAP participation rates in the country are in overwhelmingly white, Republican counties across Appalachia, the Deep South, and the Midwest.
On the ground, food insecurity would spike across MAGA country. Economists estimate that every dollar in SNAP spending generates more than a dollar and a half in local economic activity. Pull that thread, and small-town economies unravel fast. Dollar stores and small-town groceries, which rely heavily on SNAP transactions, would lose revenue and shut down. Food banks, already stretched thin, would be overwhelmed.
Poor white families who’ve long relied on the program to feed their kids would face the kind of economic desperation they’ve been taught to associate only with non-white “urban” poverty. That shock would destabilize communities already hollowed out by addiction, unemployment, disinvestment, rampant drug abuse, and climbing suicide rates.
The irony is that these same regions consistently elect politicians who rail against “welfare” and campaign on cutting “entitlements.” These are the very people who’ve benefited most from the cruelty they endorsed. If they lose their SNAP benefits, the fallout will be dramatic and expose the contradictions at the heart of their movement.
newsone.com
They cannot see that they actually voted to make their own lives worse, not better.
Likewise they'll vote for the very people who actually admit to them AHEAD OF TIME that they're all about reducing these voter's access to affordable healthcare...and they'll STILL vote Republican...probably because they don't believe it's actually THEIR affordable healthcare these Republican politicians are promising to cut, but that of the "others" less deserving than them.
And it is the same with welfare. Poor, white Republican voters historically vote overwhelmingly for the very people who again TELL THEM AHEAD OF TIME how they want to take food out of their mouths by reducing the very public assistance programs these voters depend on because again, being Republican they have a built in sense of entitlement that makes it incompresensible to them that their own welfare dependence is what these Republican politicians they vote into office are targeting. They think the targets are inner city (mostly minority) Democrat voters.
And so here we are.
Republicans are keeping government shut down because Democrats won't let them take away affordable healthcare from the people who ignorantly voted against their own best interest. This shutdown is draggng on even longer than the second longest government shutdown which occurred during Donald Trump's first term. It is dragging on so long that millions and millions of red state Trump voters may have to go hungry for Thanksgiving next month.
This would be a great time for those Republican voters to finally have that long overdue come to Jesus moment about the crazy, self-destructive crap they actually vote for.
Will finally seeing how their own votes are responsible for their own empty stomachs move the needle on their stubbornness this time?
I guess we'll soon see huh?
But what’s unfolding now is more dangerous. Inflation has already thinned grocery budgets, pandemic emergency allotments have expired, and food banks are still recovering from years of record demand. This time, the margin for survival is smaller, and the cruelty more deliberate.
What also makes this crisis different isn’t just the scale of potential hunger, it’s who will feel it. As always, Black, Brown, Indigenous, and disabled communities will be hit first and hardest because poverty in America is still structured by race and ableism. These are the families already juggling inflated grocery prices, wage gaps, and greedy landlords raising rents. They’ve weathered generations of disinvestment, redlining, and political neglect. But what makes this moment distinct is that millions of white, working-class households, many in deep-red counties, are now standing on the same cliff, about to feel the same hunger they once believed was somebody else’s problem.
If the government allows SNAP benefits to run out, the consequences will reach far beyond grocery store shelves. The collapse of the white self-sufficiency myth will hit hardest among many MAGA voters who are older, working-class white Americans in counties that depend heavily on federal aid programs like SNAP, Social Security, Medicare, disability, and farm subsidies. In fact, some of the highest SNAP participation rates in the country are in overwhelmingly white, Republican counties across Appalachia, the Deep South, and the Midwest.
On the ground, food insecurity would spike across MAGA country. Economists estimate that every dollar in SNAP spending generates more than a dollar and a half in local economic activity. Pull that thread, and small-town economies unravel fast. Dollar stores and small-town groceries, which rely heavily on SNAP transactions, would lose revenue and shut down. Food banks, already stretched thin, would be overwhelmed.
Poor white families who’ve long relied on the program to feed their kids would face the kind of economic desperation they’ve been taught to associate only with non-white “urban” poverty. That shock would destabilize communities already hollowed out by addiction, unemployment, disinvestment, rampant drug abuse, and climbing suicide rates.
The irony is that these same regions consistently elect politicians who rail against “welfare” and campaign on cutting “entitlements.” These are the very people who’ve benefited most from the cruelty they endorsed. If they lose their SNAP benefits, the fallout will be dramatic and expose the contradictions at the heart of their movement.
If SNAP Benefits Get Cut Off, White Grievance Will Eat Itself
This is a man-made public health crisis that could drive millions of families already teetering on the edge straight into hunger.
newsone.com
