Rattling the Cage Doors

[westwall]

Yeah, right on cue. You Leftards validate the OP by attacking capitalism.

I'm a better capitalist than you'll ever be. It's my profession, and I love it.
.

LOL, you're a professional capitalist? How does that work?

Okay, here we go again, just for fun: CFP/ChFC/CLU, 7/65, Partner, four books on business, +/- 30 magazine articles on business, +/- 90 business clients.

Immersed in it, and love every minute of it.

Watching with sadness as Trumpsters exercise their unique mix of arrogance and ignorance to help socialism gain ground.
.

If what you claim were true, you would have no time to be playing on a diatribe site. Your tale is as believable as onepercenter and his two teslas.

I have plenty of time. I don't work all that hard at this point.

But you wouldn't understand that.
.

Oh, i understand fine. Every IB I know works their ass off because it is fun to them. That's why i don't believe you.

 

[Mac1958]

Right on cue!
.

Yeah, right on cue. You Leftards validate the OP by attacking capitalism.

I'm a better capitalist than you'll ever be. It's my profession, and I love it.

Unfortunately, your end of the spectrum has changed it due to your arrogance and ignorance.

American Socialists thank you for that. You're the poster children for them, and they appreciate your efforts.
.

Yeah, sure. That’s why your first knee jerk response to the OP was BUT THEY HAVE TO GO AFTER WALL STREET!

Wall Street has zero power over any American. They can’t arrest us, make us buy products at gun point, force us from our homes, or take anyone’s paycheck.

But the government can and does.

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.

We learned this, painfully, with the Meltdown, which hurt millions of Americans.

I know you don't understand this, and I know what you are conditioned to believe.

I can't help you, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
.

They understand it far better than you do apparently. No one here has ever said that capitalism should have no control. Not one. Not one of the people you are lecturing was in favor of the wall street bailout. EVERY ONE OF US wanted them to fail. They screwed their investors and they screwed the American Taxpayer, and obummer, your hero, saved them.

He shouldn't have.

Now go lecture someone else.

I'll lecture who I please. If you don't like that, tough shit.

You guys sure love to whine about me, dontcha?

I'm way too far up in your heads. Creepy.
.

 

[NightFox]

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.
.

Cool straw man you got there, don't forget to put a hat on its head and corn cob pipe in its mouth when you're done with the construction.

I expected better from ya Mac...

 

[Mac1958]

I'm a better capitalist than you'll ever be. It's my profession, and I love it.
.

LOL, you're a professional capitalist? How does that work?

Okay, here we go again, just for fun: CFP/ChFC/CLU, 7/65, Partner, four books on business, +/- 30 magazine articles on business, +/- 90 business clients.

Immersed in it, and love every minute of it.

Watching with sadness as Trumpsters exercise their unique mix of arrogance and ignorance to help socialism gain ground.
.

If what you claim were true, you would have no time to be playing on a diatribe site. Your tale is as believable as onepercenter and his two teslas.

I have plenty of time. I don't work all that hard at this point.

But you wouldn't understand that.
.

Oh, i understand fine. Every IB I know works their ass off because it is fun to them. That's why i don't believe you.

Okie dokie!
.

 

[westwall]

Yeah, right on cue. You Leftards validate the OP by attacking capitalism.

I'm a better capitalist than you'll ever be. It's my profession, and I love it.

Unfortunately, your end of the spectrum has changed it due to your arrogance and ignorance.

American Socialists thank you for that. You're the poster children for them, and they appreciate your efforts.
.

Yeah, sure. That’s why your first knee jerk response to the OP was BUT THEY HAVE TO GO AFTER WALL STREET!

Wall Street has zero power over any American. They can’t arrest us, make us buy products at gun point, force us from our homes, or take anyone’s paycheck.

But the government can and does.

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.

We learned this, painfully, with the Meltdown, which hurt millions of Americans.

I know you don't understand this, and I know what you are conditioned to believe.

I can't help you, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
.

They understand it far better than you do apparently. No one here has ever said that capitalism should have no control. Not one. Not one of the people you are lecturing was in favor of the wall street bailout. EVERY ONE OF US wanted them to fail. They screwed their investors and they screwed the American Taxpayer, and obummer, your hero, saved them.

He shouldn't have.

Now go lecture someone else.

I'll lecture who I please. If you don't like that, tough shit.

You guys sure love to whine about me, dontcha?

I'm way too far up in your heads. Creepy.
.

You wish you were in our heads. it is you who are posting all the shit all of the time, clown boi. Trump has a full time residence in YOUR head....and you pay him to stay there!

 

[Mac1958]

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.
.

Cool straw man you got there, don't forget to put a hat on its head and corn cob pipe in its mouth when you're done with the construction.

I expected better from ya Mac...

Not a straw man.

But you can believe that if you'd like!
.

 

[Mac1958]

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, right on cue. You Leftards validate the OP by attacking capitalism.

I'm a better capitalist than you'll ever be. It's my profession, and I love it.

Unfortunately, your end of the spectrum has changed it due to your arrogance and ignorance.

American Socialists thank you for that. You're the poster children for them, and they appreciate your efforts.
.

Yeah, sure. That’s why your first knee jerk response to the OP was BUT THEY HAVE TO GO AFTER WALL STREET!

Wall Street has zero power over any American. They can’t arrest us, make us buy products at gun point, force us from our homes, or take anyone’s paycheck.

But the government can and does.

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.

We learned this, painfully, with the Meltdown, which hurt millions of Americans.

I know you don't understand this, and I know what you are conditioned to believe.

I can't help you, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
.

They understand it far better than you do apparently. No one here has ever said that capitalism should have no control. Not one. Not one of the people you are lecturing was in favor of the wall street bailout. EVERY ONE OF US wanted them to fail. They screwed their investors and they screwed the American Taxpayer, and obummer, your hero, saved them.

He shouldn't have.

Now go lecture someone else.

I'll lecture who I please. If you don't like that, tough shit.

You guys sure love to whine about me, dontcha?

I'm way too far up in your heads. Creepy.
.

Name one time Wall Street made anyone buy a product they didn’t want, imprison them, take their paycheck by force, or take someone’s home against their will.

I’ll wait.

 

[Mac1958]

I'm a better capitalist than you'll ever be. It's my profession, and I love it.

Unfortunately, your end of the spectrum has changed it due to your arrogance and ignorance.

American Socialists thank you for that. You're the poster children for them, and they appreciate your efforts.
.

Yeah, sure. That’s why your first knee jerk response to the OP was BUT THEY HAVE TO GO AFTER WALL STREET!

Wall Street has zero power over any American. They can’t arrest us, make us buy products at gun point, force us from our homes, or take anyone’s paycheck.

But the government can and does.

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.

We learned this, painfully, with the Meltdown, which hurt millions of Americans.

I know you don't understand this, and I know what you are conditioned to believe.

I can't help you, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
.

They understand it far better than you do apparently. No one here has ever said that capitalism should have no control. Not one. Not one of the people you are lecturing was in favor of the wall street bailout. EVERY ONE OF US wanted them to fail. They screwed their investors and they screwed the American Taxpayer, and obummer, your hero, saved them.

He shouldn't have.

Now go lecture someone else.

I'll lecture who I please. If you don't like that, tough shit.

You guys sure love to whine about me, dontcha?

I'm way too far up in your heads. Creepy.
.

Name one time Wall Street made anyone buy a product they didn’t want, imprison them, take their paycheck by force, or take someone’s home against their will.

I’ll wait.

Never that I'm aware of.

Is that some kind of point?
.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, sure. That’s why your first knee jerk response to the OP was BUT THEY HAVE TO GO AFTER WALL STREET!

Wall Street has zero power over any American. They can’t arrest us, make us buy products at gun point, force us from our homes, or take anyone’s paycheck.

But the government can and does.

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.

We learned this, painfully, with the Meltdown, which hurt millions of Americans.

I know you don't understand this, and I know what you are conditioned to believe.

I can't help you, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
.

They understand it far better than you do apparently. No one here has ever said that capitalism should have no control. Not one. Not one of the people you are lecturing was in favor of the wall street bailout. EVERY ONE OF US wanted them to fail. They screwed their investors and they screwed the American Taxpayer, and obummer, your hero, saved them.

He shouldn't have.

Now go lecture someone else.

I'll lecture who I please. If you don't like that, tough shit.

You guys sure love to whine about me, dontcha?

I'm way too far up in your heads. Creepy.
.

Name one time Wall Street made anyone buy a product they didn’t want, imprison them, take their paycheck by force, or take someone’s home against their will.

I’ll wait.

Never that I'm aware of.

Is that some kind of point?
.

Well, normal humans are more concerned about organizations that have total control over their lives, not organizations that have zero control.

 

[Mac1958]

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.

We learned this, painfully, with the Meltdown, which hurt millions of Americans.

I know you don't understand this, and I know what you are conditioned to believe.

I can't help you, and I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
.

They understand it far better than you do apparently. No one here has ever said that capitalism should have no control. Not one. Not one of the people you are lecturing was in favor of the wall street bailout. EVERY ONE OF US wanted them to fail. They screwed their investors and they screwed the American Taxpayer, and obummer, your hero, saved them.

He shouldn't have.

Now go lecture someone else.

I'll lecture who I please. If you don't like that, tough shit.

You guys sure love to whine about me, dontcha?

I'm way too far up in your heads. Creepy.
.

Name one time Wall Street made anyone buy a product they didn’t want, imprison them, take their paycheck by force, or take someone’s home against their will.

I’ll wait.

Never that I'm aware of.

Is that some kind of point?
.

Well, normal humans are more concerned about organizations that have total control over their lives, not organizations that have zero control.

Total? Zero?

Life is nuance, equilibrium. I can't help you.
.

 

[westwall]

They understand it far better than you do apparently. No one here has ever said that capitalism should have no control. Not one. Not one of the people you are lecturing was in favor of the wall street bailout. EVERY ONE OF US wanted them to fail. They screwed their investors and they screwed the American Taxpayer, and obummer, your hero, saved them.

He shouldn't have.

Now go lecture someone else.

I'll lecture who I please. If you don't like that, tough shit.

You guys sure love to whine about me, dontcha?

I'm way too far up in your heads. Creepy.
.

Name one time Wall Street made anyone buy a product they didn’t want, imprison them, take their paycheck by force, or take someone’s home against their will.

I’ll wait.

Never that I'm aware of.

Is that some kind of point?
.

Well, normal humans are more concerned about organizations that have total control over their lives, not organizations that have zero control.

Total? Zero?

Life is nuance, equilibrium. I can't help you.
.

Correct. You're simply not smart enough to educate anyone, about anything. You are truly beyond help.

 

[NightFox]

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.
.

Cool straw man you got there, don't forget to put a hat on its head and corn cob pipe in its mouth when you're done with the construction.

I expected better from ya Mac...

Not a straw man.

But you can believe that if you'd like!
.

Well, I suppose I should thank you for giving me your permission to believe what I can plainly see with my own two eyes.

Anywho... are you under the impression that there were no "controls on capitalism" prior to the last "meltdown" or that the concept of MORAL HAZARD didn't exist prior to 2009? Are you aware that the politicians and regulatory bodies that implement those "controls" have a pretty shady track record when it comes to avoiding conflicts of interest and outright incompetence?

Is it possible that "Wall Street" is just playing the game that the referees laid out for them to play and that the real problem is the ******* REFEREES ?

"SEC audits consisted primarily of confirming that a checklist of documents existed, not necessarily that these documents were accurate, not even that they reflected real trade; just that you had the proper papers in your files." -- Harry Markopolos, No One Would Listen

 

[Mac1958]

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.
.

Cool straw man you got there, don't forget to put a hat on its head and corn cob pipe in its mouth when you're done with the construction.

I expected better from ya Mac...

Not a straw man.

But you can believe that if you'd like!
.

Well, I suppose I should thank you for giving me your permission to believe what I can plainly see with my own two eyes.

Anywho... are you under the impression that there were no "controls on capitalism" prior to the last "meltdown" or that the concept of MORAL HAZARD didn't exist prior to 2009? Are you aware that the politicians and regulatory bodies that implement those "controls" have a pretty shady track record when it comes to avoiding conflicts of interest and outright incompetency?

Is it possible that "Wall Street" is just playing the game that the referees laid out for them to play and that the real problem is the ******* REFEREES ?

"SEC audits consisted primarily of confirming that a checklist of documents existed, not necessarily that these documents were accurate, not even that they reflected real trade; just that you had the proper papers in your files." -- Harry Markopolos, No One Would Listen

Markets were ridiculously under-regulated in the run-up to the Meltdown.

That's how Wall Street and the ratings agencies were allowed to get away with what they did.

Free market icon Alan Greenspan admitted he blew it.
.

 

[NightFox]

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.
.

Cool straw man you got there, don't forget to put a hat on its head and corn cob pipe in its mouth when you're done with the construction.

I expected better from ya Mac...

Not a straw man.

But you can believe that if you'd like!
.

Well, I suppose I should thank you for giving me your permission to believe what I can plainly see with my own two eyes.

Anywho... are you under the impression that there were no "controls on capitalism" prior to the last "meltdown" or that the concept of MORAL HAZARD didn't exist prior to 2009? Are you aware that the politicians and regulatory bodies that implement those "controls" have a pretty shady track record when it comes to avoiding conflicts of interest and outright incompetency?

Is it possible that "Wall Street" is just playing the game that the referees laid out for them to play and that the real problem is the ******* REFEREES ?

"SEC audits consisted primarily of confirming that a checklist of documents existed, not necessarily that these documents were accurate, not even that they reflected real trade; just that you had the proper papers in your files." -- Harry Markopolos, No One Would Listen

Markets were ridiculously under-regulated in the run-up to the Meltdown.

Define "under-regulated", how many more tens of thousands of pages of regulations, legions of regulators and 10's of billions of dollars would have been required for it to be "regulated" ?

That's how Wall Street and the ratings agencies were allowed to get away with what they did.

Hmmm... are you suggesting that the politicians and regulatory agencies didn't know that derivatives coupled with implicit moral hazard were creating systemic risk or that they just didn't give a **** about it?

Free market icon Alan Greenspan admitted he blew it.
.

Ummm..no he didn't , he admitted to a flaw in the model that he used to understand the functioning of markets (aka efficient markets theory) and Greenspan wasn't any "Free Market Icon" , he was the chairman of the federal reserve for cryin' out loud, you know , the ******* CENTRAL PLANNER for the MONEY SUPPLY and NUMERO UNO MARKET INTERVENTIONIST personified.

Greenspan lost his free market creds back when he decided to become a government bureaucrat and political stooge but thank you for sharing popular misconceptions and urban myth.

 

[Mac1958]

You folks have been conned into believing that controls are a bane to capitalism, while the fact is that they are a critical component of capitalism.
.

Cool straw man you got there, don't forget to put a hat on its head and corn cob pipe in its mouth when you're done with the construction.

I expected better from ya Mac...

Not a straw man.

But you can believe that if you'd like!
.

Well, I suppose I should thank you for giving me your permission to believe what I can plainly see with my own two eyes.

Anywho... are you under the impression that there were no "controls on capitalism" prior to the last "meltdown" or that the concept of MORAL HAZARD didn't exist prior to 2009? Are you aware that the politicians and regulatory bodies that implement those "controls" have a pretty shady track record when it comes to avoiding conflicts of interest and outright incompetency?

Is it possible that "Wall Street" is just playing the game that the referees laid out for them to play and that the real problem is the ******* REFEREES ?

"SEC audits consisted primarily of confirming that a checklist of documents existed, not necessarily that these documents were accurate, not even that they reflected real trade; just that you had the proper papers in your files." -- Harry Markopolos, No One Would Listen

Markets were ridiculously under-regulated in the run-up to the Meltdown.

Define "under-regulated", how many more tens of thousands of pages of regulations, legions of regulators and 10's of billions of dollars would have been required for it to be "regulated" ?

That's how Wall Street and the ratings agencies were allowed to get away with what they did.

Hmmm... are you suggesting that the politicians and regulatory agencies didn't know that derivatives coupled with implicit moral hazard were creating systemic risk or that they just didn't give a **** about it?

Free market icon Alan Greenspan admitted he blew it.
.

Ummm..no he didn't , he admitted to a flaw in the model that he used to understand the functioning of markets (aka efficient markets theory) and Greenspan wasn't any "Free Market Icon" , he was the chairman of the federal reserve for cryin' out loud, you know , the ******* CENTRAL PLANNER for the MONEY SUPPLY and NUMERO UNO MARKET INTERVENTIONIST personified.

Greenspan lost his free market creds back when he decided to become a government bureaucrat and political stooge but thank you for sharing popular misconceptions and urban myth.

I'm sure you're right.
.

 

[NightFox]

Cool straw man you got there, don't forget to put a hat on its head and corn cob pipe in its mouth when you're done with the construction.

I expected better from ya Mac...

Not a straw man.

But you can believe that if you'd like!
.

Well, I suppose I should thank you for giving me your permission to believe what I can plainly see with my own two eyes.

Anywho... are you under the impression that there were no "controls on capitalism" prior to the last "meltdown" or that the concept of MORAL HAZARD didn't exist prior to 2009? Are you aware that the politicians and regulatory bodies that implement those "controls" have a pretty shady track record when it comes to avoiding conflicts of interest and outright incompetency?

Is it possible that "Wall Street" is just playing the game that the referees laid out for them to play and that the real problem is the ******* REFEREES ?

"SEC audits consisted primarily of confirming that a checklist of documents existed, not necessarily that these documents were accurate, not even that they reflected real trade; just that you had the proper papers in your files." -- Harry Markopolos, No One Would Listen

Markets were ridiculously under-regulated in the run-up to the Meltdown.

Define "under-regulated", how many more tens of thousands of pages of regulations, legions of regulators and 10's of billions of dollars would have been required for it to be "regulated" ?

That's how Wall Street and the ratings agencies were allowed to get away with what they did.

Hmmm... are you suggesting that the politicians and regulatory agencies didn't know that derivatives coupled with implicit moral hazard were creating systemic risk or that they just didn't give a **** about it?

Free market icon Alan Greenspan admitted he blew it.
.

Ummm..no he didn't , he admitted to a flaw in the model that he used to understand the functioning of markets (aka efficient markets theory) and Greenspan wasn't any "Free Market Icon" , he was the chairman of the federal reserve for cryin' out loud, you know , the ******* CENTRAL PLANNER for the MONEY SUPPLY and NUMERO UNO MARKET INTERVENTIONIST personified.

Greenspan lost his free market creds back when he decided to become a government bureaucrat and political stooge but thank you for sharing popular misconceptions and urban myth.

I'm sure you're right.
.

K, later...

Have a nice day.

 

[westwall]

Not a straw man.

But you can believe that if you'd like!
.

Well, I suppose I should thank you for giving me your permission to believe what I can plainly see with my own two eyes.

Anywho... are you under the impression that there were no "controls on capitalism" prior to the last "meltdown" or that the concept of MORAL HAZARD didn't exist prior to 2009? Are you aware that the politicians and regulatory bodies that implement those "controls" have a pretty shady track record when it comes to avoiding conflicts of interest and outright incompetency?

Is it possible that "Wall Street" is just playing the game that the referees laid out for them to play and that the real problem is the ******* REFEREES ?

"SEC audits consisted primarily of confirming that a checklist of documents existed, not necessarily that these documents were accurate, not even that they reflected real trade; just that you had the proper papers in your files." -- Harry Markopolos, No One Would Listen

Markets were ridiculously under-regulated in the run-up to the Meltdown.

Define "under-regulated", how many more tens of thousands of pages of regulations, legions of regulators and 10's of billions of dollars would have been required for it to be "regulated" ?

That's how Wall Street and the ratings agencies were allowed to get away with what they did.

Hmmm... are you suggesting that the politicians and regulatory agencies didn't know that derivatives coupled with implicit moral hazard were creating systemic risk or that they just didn't give a **** about it?

Free market icon Alan Greenspan admitted he blew it.
.

Ummm..no he didn't , he admitted to a flaw in the model that he used to understand the functioning of markets (aka efficient markets theory) and Greenspan wasn't any "Free Market Icon" , he was the chairman of the federal reserve for cryin' out loud, you know , the ******* CENTRAL PLANNER for the MONEY SUPPLY and NUMERO UNO MARKET INTERVENTIONIST personified.

Greenspan lost his free market creds back when he decided to become a government bureaucrat and political stooge but thank you for sharing popular misconceptions and urban myth.

I'm sure you're right.
.

K, later...

Have a nice day.

Mac doesn't like it when he gets schooled so comprehensively .

 

[Mac1958]

Well, I suppose I should thank you for giving me your permission to believe what I can plainly see with my own two eyes.

Anywho... are you under the impression that there were no "controls on capitalism" prior to the last "meltdown" or that the concept of MORAL HAZARD didn't exist prior to 2009? Are you aware that the politicians and regulatory bodies that implement those "controls" have a pretty shady track record when it comes to avoiding conflicts of interest and outright incompetency?

Is it possible that "Wall Street" is just playing the game that the referees laid out for them to play and that the real problem is the ******* REFEREES ?

"SEC audits consisted primarily of confirming that a checklist of documents existed, not necessarily that these documents were accurate, not even that they reflected real trade; just that you had the proper papers in your files." -- Harry Markopolos, No One Would Listen

Markets were ridiculously under-regulated in the run-up to the Meltdown.

Define "under-regulated", how many more tens of thousands of pages of regulations, legions of regulators and 10's of billions of dollars would have been required for it to be "regulated" ?

That's how Wall Street and the ratings agencies were allowed to get away with what they did.

Hmmm... are you suggesting that the politicians and regulatory agencies didn't know that derivatives coupled with implicit moral hazard were creating systemic risk or that they just didn't give a **** about it?

Free market icon Alan Greenspan admitted he blew it.
.

Ummm..no he didn't , he admitted to a flaw in the model that he used to understand the functioning of markets (aka efficient markets theory) and Greenspan wasn't any "Free Market Icon" , he was the chairman of the federal reserve for cryin' out loud, you know , the ******* CENTRAL PLANNER for the MONEY SUPPLY and NUMERO UNO MARKET INTERVENTIONIST personified.

Greenspan lost his free market creds back when he decided to become a government bureaucrat and political stooge but thank you for sharing popular misconceptions and urban myth.

I'm sure you're right.
.

K, later...

Have a nice day.

Mac doesn't like it when he gets schooled so comprehensively .

Trumpsters can't school me on the Meltdown any more than Regressive Lefties can school me on Identity Politics.

I'm not bothering with either any more.

Believe what talk radio tells you. I just don't have to enable you.
.

 

[NightFox]

Markets were ridiculously under-regulated in the run-up to the Meltdown.

Define "under-regulated", how many more tens of thousands of pages of regulations, legions of regulators and 10's of billions of dollars would have been required for it to be "regulated" ?

That's how Wall Street and the ratings agencies were allowed to get away with what they did.

Hmmm... are you suggesting that the politicians and regulatory agencies didn't know that derivatives coupled with implicit moral hazard were creating systemic risk or that they just didn't give a **** about it?

Free market icon Alan Greenspan admitted he blew it.
.

Ummm..no he didn't , he admitted to a flaw in the model that he used to understand the functioning of markets (aka efficient markets theory) and Greenspan wasn't any "Free Market Icon" , he was the chairman of the federal reserve for cryin' out loud, you know , the ******* CENTRAL PLANNER for the MONEY SUPPLY and NUMERO UNO MARKET INTERVENTIONIST personified.

Greenspan lost his free market creds back when he decided to become a government bureaucrat and political stooge but thank you for sharing popular misconceptions and urban myth.

I'm sure you're right.
.

K, later...

Have a nice day.

Mac doesn't like it when he gets schooled so comprehensively .

Trumpsters can't school me on the Meltdown any more than Regressive Lefties can school me on Identity Politics.

I'm not bothering with either any more.

Believe what talk radio tells you. I just don't have to enable you.
.

ROFLMAO! so what you're REALLY saying is that you're a know it all that refuses to defend your assertions because anybody that questions you is either a "Trumpster" or a "Regressive Leftie" which makes their viewpoints worthless?

Did you trip and fall into a vat of opioides or sumptin' Mac ?