Rasmussen calls Nate Silver "pathetic liar"

[Toro]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

 

[Meathead]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

Is it really that difficult to factor in the EC for a professional? Seriously?

 

[Centrista]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He sucks as an analyst because of one miss?

 

[theHawk]

lol lol lol and of course that's why you as well as the MSM has less than zero credibility now. Your lying has caught up with you deviants and hacks.

Rasmussen is the one who has lost credibility by consistently giving Trump higher approval ratings than anyone else and that is why rhey are freaking out. Their click bait polls supporting Trump have been a short term effort for increasing attention for their site, but a current and long term loss.

Or your left loon polls consistently give Trump lower aporoval ratings lol

Polls are worthless....as witnessed in 2016.

Election night was hilarious watching you loons meltdown...because you believed the polls

The Washington Post had Hillary ahead by 3%. She won by 2%.

She lost....retard

Polls measure the popular vote. We are talking about poll accuracy, therefore we have to talk about the popular vote, not the electoral college. You are too dumb for this thread.

Wrong. They did polls state by state, and predicted Hilary would win several states that she lost.

 

[Meathead]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He sucks as an analyst because of one miss?

He sucks if he didn't factor in the EC, at least according to JoeB who has a very tenuous grasp of reality anyway.

 

[Picaro]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

lol nobody said he was wrong, they're saying he was just shilling for Hillary, like you do, only he does have better math skills than you do, which is why we know he was lying while we know you're just merely stupid.

 

[Toro]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

Is it really that difficult to factor in the EC for a professional? Seriously?

It is if you use national polls.

It’s less so if one uses state polls. That’s why even though Silver was at 30%, he gave Trump one of the highest probabilities of winning of all the prognosticators. State polls were showing much tighter races across the country than national polls implied. But state polls are generally more difficult to assess than national polls.

 

[Toro]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

lol nobody said he was wrong, they're saying he was just shilling for Hillary, like you do, only he does have better math skills than you do, which is why we know he was lying while we know you're just merely stupid.

He was not “shilling for Hillary,” you low-IQ partisan hack, Pictardo.

You guys are so far up your Orange God’s ass that you perceive any possible negative event affecting Orange Jesus as being against your messiah and you. Now go back to your remedial math class.

 

[Meathead]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

lol nobody said he was wrong, they're saying he was just shilling for Hillary, like you do, only he does have better math skills than you do, which is why we know he was lying while we know you're just merely stupid.

He was not “shilling for Hillary,” you low-IQ partisan hack, Pictardo.

You guys are so far up your Orange God’s ass that you perceive any possible negative event affecting Orange Jesus as being against your messiah and you. Now go back to your remedial math class.

Question: which number is higher, 306 or 232?
Come on, even if you're black you should get this.

 

[Picaro]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

lol nobody said he was wrong, they're saying he was just shilling for Hillary, like you do, only he does have better math skills than you do, which is why we know he was lying while we know you're just merely stupid.

He was not “shilling for Hillary,” you low-IQ partisan hack, Pictardo.

You guys are so far up your Orange God’s ass that you perceive any possible negative event affecting Orange Jesus as being against your messiah and you. Now go back to your remedial math class.

Of course he was, tard; the tactic is to fool people into not voting because they think their guy has already won or lost and there is no point in bothering. See, we know you're not very bright about this sort of stuff, so we don't ask you hard questions that involve numbers and stuff like that.

 

[Toro]

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Then he sucks as an analyst. Pathetic

He called every single election in 2012.

But because he got Orange Jesus wrong, his worshippers think that he’s always wrong.

That’s what people who don’t understand math and worship a man as a God will do.

lol nobody said he was wrong, they're saying he was just shilling for Hillary, like you do, only he does have better math skills than you do, which is why we know he was lying while we know you're just merely stupid.

He was not “shilling for Hillary,” you low-IQ partisan hack, Pictardo.

You guys are so far up your Orange God’s ass that you perceive any possible negative event affecting Orange Jesus as being against your messiah and you. Now go back to your remedial math class.

Of course he was, tard; the tactic is to fool people into not voting because they think their guy has already won or lost and there is no point in bothering. See, we know you're not very bright about this sort of stuff, so we don't ask you hard questions that involve numbers and stuff like that.

Whackjobs

 

[whitehall]

Pollsters v pollsters? Only lefties seem to care.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Yeah Silver had Clinton over Trump 71% -29%.

Lol

Except she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.

Except...........she lost. Lol.

 

[busybee01]

This was Rasmussen's last polling on the generic ballot in 2018.

Republicans 46%
Democrats 45%
Republicans +1

This was based on the actual voting.
Democrats 53.,3
Republicans 44.9
Democrats +8.4

The pollsters who came the closest.
ABC/Washington Post Democrats +8
USA Today/Suffolk Democrats +8
IBD/TIPP Democrats +9

Rasmussen was a whopping 9 points off.

 

[busybee01]

Rasmussen is the one who has lost credibility by consistently giving Trump higher approval ratings than anyone else and that is why rhey are freaking out. Their click bait polls supporting Trump have been a short term effort for increasing attention for their site, but a current and long term loss.

Or your left loon polls consistently give Trump lower aporoval ratings lol

Polls are worthless....as witnessed in 2016.

Election night was hilarious watching you loons meltdown...because you believed the polls

The Washington Post had Hillary ahead by 3%. She won by 2%.

She lost....retard

Polls measure the popular vote. We are talking about poll accuracy, therefore we have to talk about the popular vote, not the electoral college. You are too dumb for this thread.

Wrong. They did polls state by state, and predicted Hilary would win several states that she lost.

The major pollsters did not do state by state polls. The state by state polls are generally done by smaller companies such as Suffolk or colleges such as Monmouth or Quinnipiac.

 

[Picaro]

Where is this list of states where she 'won the popular vote', and what state districts did these magic votes come from?

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Nate Silver pointed out that Rasmussen predicted a narrow GOP victory in the 2018 House midterms, and Democrats ended up winning easily.
Trump's favorite pollster became instantly triggered:

Correct. He is a con artist

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Silver was able to figure what a lot of people knew in 2008; that Obama had a lot of seedy people stuffing ballot boxes and doing phony counts. I don't think there is anything special about this cheerleader.