- Mar 11, 2015
- 78,919
- 40,077
- 2,645
Why would you discuss fake numbers just for the sake of discussion? Is this another white deflection?Information derived from white supremacist sources have no merit. And do not preted these were charts from the DOJ.
'Using figures for the 2013 racial mix of the population–62.2 percent white, 17.1 percent Hispanic, 13.2 percent black–we can calculate the average likelihood of a person of each race attacking the other. A black is 27 times more likely to attack a white and 8 times more likely to attack a Hispanic than the other way around. A Hispanic is eight times more likely to attack a white than vice versa.
We can also calculate how often criminals of each group choose victims of other races. As indicated below, when whites commit violence they choose fellow whites as victims 82.4 percent of the time, and almost never attack blacks. Blacks attack whites almost as often as they attack blacks, and Hispanics attack whites more often than they attack any other group, including their own."
New DOJ Statistics on Race and Violent Crime - American Renaissance
These are Jared Taylors calculations not the DOJ's. It is made up white racist garbage.
For the sake of discussion, lets say the numbers are 100% accurate. Would that bother you?
Mark
Prove the numbers are fake. Show me where the numbers are fake.
No.
93 percent of crime committed by blacks are against other blacks. This has been proven. That leaves 7 percent.
So you prove your numbers are real.
I do not know if the stats are entirely correct--------but based on what I have
observed it is very clear to me that blacks commit lots of crime against each
other. You got a theory as to why?
Since the majority of all crimes are intra racial and 90 percent of crimes whites commit are against other whites, it is very clear that you ignore white on white crime because you're racist.