Rachel Maddow & Hillary Clinton Say That Questioning Elections Is Dangerous For Democracy!!

[Nostra]

How would that happen, exactly?

I think what you are misquoting is one county has more people in it than 40 states do. Which is a meaningless statistic. It's not 40 states combined. Each state would make a contribution...

Here's the better question, why do these places where few people live get an outsized voice in picking the president?

They get a voice because the Founding Fathers were light years smarter than you are, Simp.

HTH

 

[JoeB131]

They get a voice because the Founding Fathers were light years smarter than you are, Simp.

If the Founding Slave Rapists were so smart, we wouldn't have fought a civil war 80 years later.

 

[Nostra]

If the Founding Slave Rapists were so smart, we wouldn't have fought a civil war 80 years later.

You just proved my post correct, Simp.

 

[berg80]

Remind me again of which party it was that claimed the 2000 election was stolen?

Not stolen. Not in the sense of there being fraudulent votes cast. In the sense the conservatives on the SC prevented FL from continuing to carry out the recount (it has been proven a statewide recount would have resulted in Gore winning the presidency), thus handing the election to Bush. Just the facts, man.

 

[berg80]

Once you remove the accusations of hypocrisy included in the OP, Clinton and Maddow are absolutely right. Questioning election results without factual backing to do so IS BAD FOR DEMOCRACY. That's why Trump does it. That and his insatiable ego not allowing him to consider the majority of Americans do not want him to be prez again......ever.

 

[Nostra]

Not stolen. Not in the sense of there being fraudulent votes cast. In the sense the conservatives on the SC prevented FL from continuing to carry out the recount (it has been proven a statewide recount would have resulted in Gore winning the presidency), thus handing the election to Bush. Just the facts, man.

A statewide recount didn't show Gore winning.

 

[Nostra]

Once you remove the accusations of hypocrisy included in the OP, Clinton and Maddow are absolutely right. Questioning election results without factual backing to do so IS BAD FOR DEMOCRACY. That's why Trump does it. That and his insatiable ego not allowing him to consider the majority of Americans do not want him to be prez again......ever.

The majority of the Dimwinger party doesn't want your Vegetable Messiah to be prez again......ever.

 

[Nostra]

Not stolen. Not in the sense of there being fraudulent votes cast. In the sense the conservatives on the SC prevented FL from continuing to carry out the recount (it has been proven a statewide recount would have resulted in Gore winning the presidency), thus handing the election to Bush. Just the facts, man.

You are a liar berg80 . A statewide recount actually showed Bush's margin of victory increased, Simp.

Media Recount: Bush Won the 2000 Election

More than three months after Democrat Al Gore conceded the contested 2000 election, an independent hand recount of Florida's ballots released Tuesday says he would have lost anyway, even if officials would have allowed the hand count he requested.

www.pbs.org

 

[Dragonlady]

Don't know where you're from, but here in America we have this thing called the Electoral College. All past elections up until 2020 were fair elections. Gate's and Fauci's virus along with manipulated “mail-in ballots” changed things.

No, they weren’t. Elections prior to the electronic age were rife with illegal voting, and shenanigans. That’s why it’s so easy for Trump to convince people that cheating is going on now, because there was so much of it in the past.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/09/28/stolen-disputed-presidential-elections-trump/

Now that they’re using voting machines and having machines count the ballots, instead of hand counts, plus voter ID, it’s much much harder to cheat.

But Trump’s threats in the summer before the election that the courts would be deciding the election, was is a clarion call to secretaries of state to make good and sure that their state’s results were correct. None of them wanted the embarrassment of having the courts overturned their states results.

As for the electoral college, the two presidents that the college has inflicted on the American people in the past 20 years were two of the worst Presidents in American history. This was the very thing that the college was designed to present – the people being duped into voting for an unsuitable candidate.

 

[Nostra]

As for the electoral college, the two presidents that the college has inflicted on the American people in the past 20 years were two of the worst Presidents in American history. This was the very thing that the college was designed to present – the people being duped into voting for an unsuitable candidate.

Funny how you only go back 20 years. Slick Willy never got a majority of the vote, Dumbass.

As a matter of fact, neither did Hitlery.

 

[Dragonlady]

The majority of the Dimwinger party doesn't want your Vegetable Messiah to be prez again......ever.

The American people don’t want Donald Trump back in any political office. Ever. Regardless of his polling numbers, they’re done with him. He’s entertaining but incompetent.

No, Republican is openly the endorsing Donald Trump. He’s lost every election since 2016 and has never won the popular vote in any election he’s run in.

You’re also mischaracterizing what the Democrats are saying. Democrats think that Joe Biden is doing one hell of a job, and he truly is, but they want someone younger and that’s a good and valid idea.

But the first priority is to ensure that Donald Trump or an idiot, like Ron DeSantis doesn’t get into the White House and **** things up all over again.

The last 40 years of Republicans crashing the economy every time they get in the White House. Republicans crash the economy and Democrats patch it back up again and then Republicans crash it the next time they get in the White House.

Since the crashes impoverish working Americans and financially benefit, billionaires and corporations, the crashes to become a feature, not a bug a of Republican economic policy.

Don’t waste your time asking for links that you’re not going to read. Nor will I be posting any response to your usual insults or abuse.

 

[MagicMike]

Wow! Sage advice from two of the most honest and upright women in America. Oh, who am I kidding. They're both a couple of whores. But anyway, they were both recently heard saying that “bad actors” shouldn't question election results. I mean ... it's not like they've ever done anything like that. Am I right?

You are a liar. This OP is FAKE NEWS
and here is why?
Nowhere in the link you provided does anyone say what you claim they do; that "questioning elections should be illegal," or that "bad actors shouldn't question elections.
The quote is "when bad actors tell us falsely that an election was stolen."
See the HUGE difference in meaning?
"illegal to QUESTION an election."
vs.
"bad actors tell us FALSELY that an election was STOLEN."
Nice try though.
Change the quote so you can do your pissy little victim dance about how them librul bitches are pickin on MAGAt Trumptards by God!
**** off poser.

 

[Dragonlady]

Funny how you only go back 20 years. Slick Willy never got a majority of the vote, Dumbass.

As a matter of fact, neither did Hitlery.

Slick Willy won in a landslide asshole. He was more popular than Ronald Reagan, and that’s why Republicans impeached him.

Presidential Approval Ratings — Bill Clinton

Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president?

news.gallup.com

He balanced the budget, deported illegals by the thousands, and raised the minimum wage. Republicans impeached him in a rage and he still left office with higher approval numbers than when he arrived.

1992 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

[1996 United States presidential election - Wikipedia.

Everything in your post was wrong and the links prove it and yet I didn’t call you a liar. When you lie to someone, you’re telling them they’re stupid to their face. You think they’re not smart enough to know you’re lying.

You’re not smart enough to be a liar you’re just wrong.

 

[sparky]

Neither of these two twits understand democracy~S~

 

[Dragonlady]

Wow! Sage advice from two of the most honest and upright women in America. Oh, who am I kidding. They're both a couple of whores. But anyway, they were both recently heard saying that “bad actors” shouldn't question election results. I mean ... it's not like they've ever done anything like that. Am I right?

Can you point us to any part of this interview wherein either of these women said that “no one should ever question the results of an election”?

The OP is a lie, because neither of them ever said it. What they said, was that once the election has been certified, and the courts of upheld those certifications it’s over.

When the DOJ, FBI every law-enforcement agency in the country has tracked down every report of fraud, and has certified that there was no cheating or irregularities in the election, and that it was the safest, most secure election in American history, continuing to make false claims of non-existent election fraud, only serves to undermine public faith in the results of their elections.

And no, neither Maddow, nor Clinton has ever tried to overthrow the legally elected government of the United States of America. Donald Trump was on TV last night calling for more violence.

LOCK HIM UP.

 

[Dragonlady]

Funny how you only go back 20 years. Slick Willy never got a majority of the vote, Dumbass.

As a matter of fact, neither did Hitlery.

Do you enjoy going through life having your ass handed to you on a plate for being wrong every time, or are you just that stupid?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The 2000 and 2016 elections were stolen. The majority voted for someone else.

2004 I guess you won fair and square, in that you terrified people into thinking there were Arabs under their beds.

Popular vote= Leftard feelings.

This is why democrats should not be in charge of anything above janitorial work.

 

[Marener]

You are a liar berg80 . A statewide recount actually showed Bush's margin of victory increased, Simp.

Media Recount: Bush Won the 2000 Election

More than three months after Democrat Al Gore conceded the contested 2000 election, an independent hand recount of Florida's ballots released Tuesday says he would have lost anyway, even if officials would have allowed the hand count he requested.

www.pbs.org

Gore won when the firm recounted every vote.

From your own article:
In their reports, the newspapers assumed counts already completed when the court-ordered recount was stopped would have been included in any official count. Thus, they allowed numbers from seven counties — Palm Beach, Volusia, Broward, Hamilton, Manatee, Escambia and Madison — to stand, but applied the most inclusive standards to votes in the rest of the state. If those numbers did not stand, the Herald reported, a more generous hypothetical revisited recount would have scored the White House for Gore — but with only a 393-vote margin.

 

[BlindBoo]

Funny how you only go back 20 years. Slick Willy never got a majority of the vote, Dumbass.

As a matter of fact, neither did Hitlery.

370 to 168, or 379 to 159, is not a majority?

Gore conceded after he lost his final bid in the courts. Hillary called Donnie Dangerously in the wee hour the morning after to concede the 2016 race. Dickhead Donald is still telling his thongs of supporter he actually won, just like he did before all the votes were counted the night of.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Sure he would. And he'd still be eaten. That's how democracy works. Now, if the sheep can make a convincing argument to one of the wolves to have something else for dinner, have at it.

Of course, it's a stupid analogy because wolves and sheep can't talk or discuss something.

Psssssssstt…… you’re the sheep.