Race Differences in average IQ are Largely Genetic

Status
Not open for further replies.
672o0l

Those are from the King Tut Collection. Sold at Macy's and Sak's Fifth Avenue in downtown Mudug.
 
Knowledge (brain power) is part of human evolution, and the negro just happened to develop in regions where that aspect was lacking, because they didn't need it; in their environments a different skill set was needed. It doesn't make them any less human.

The idea that there is no "access to education" is bullshit. People choose whether or not to partake in their own learning.

Think about this- where the negro man has developed has been and is in the Western world, which you just admitted to without realizing it. It took the Caucasian to calm the natives across the world, to bring knowledge and civilized behavior. How is it even possible that people still today will often bath in the same water that they drink? That's not limited access, that's limited intelligence.

Thomas Sowell showed in the early 1970's how the IQ gap among black versus white began to diminish the more the black became educated. Educated by White Society. Think about that.

Here is the problem with your aborted thinking. Before whites existed there were great civilizations on the African continent. Black Africans in Egypt preceded everyone in the quest for advanced knowledge. That doesn't mean Black Africans are more intelligent, it just means they were first. Sorry if that hurts you.

Your highlighted example tells me only one thing. If you teach people a system they will grasp it at a basic level all things considered equal. if they have impediments to competing in a system not of their choosing they will underachieve.

It's hilarious and pathetic that anyone with one functioning eye can see that blacks excel beyond whites in most sports and no one takes issue with that reality, but whites functioning more skillfully in academics is some kind of luck of the draw of being born with less melanin.

You inadvertently show how ignorant you are when you say that Blacks are more advanced physically. You evidently don't realize that thought itself is a physical action. Thought does not occur in the great beyond where you cannot observe it. It occurs as a result of synapses firing in the brain. This is a very physical action. So if your claim is that Blacks are more advanced physically, you just admitted we are superior to whites dumbass! :lol:

All those synapses could not build Western Civilization. They couldn't invent like DaVinci, paint or sculpt like Michelangelo, cure disease like Pasteur, understand science and math like Newton, or create music like Mozart. They could run for their lives from predators and put plates in their lips, living in stick huts mortared with goat dung. Big fucking woop.

You heritage, chum. I understand why you'd want to try and rewrite reality but your wishes are null and void.

But you see they did do all that. How do you think Europeans found out how to advance? They were taught by the people that discovered knowledge first. The Black Africans. After they destroyed themselves and went back to the Dark Ages who do you think retaught them? The Black African Moors. Its a pretty consistent pattern. We were here first. We will be here last. When racist whites die off or are absorbed into the worlds population then we will be able to continue in our quest for more knowledge without all this silliness you guys try to prove. :lol:
 
50% of the people are less intelligent than the other half. I wonder which half the racists of this thread are a member of.
 
You're all a bunch of fucking idiots, from the "Ancient Egyptians looked like Swedes!" douchebags to the "The ancient black man created everything!" douchebag. You are all the same hopeless fucking clowns.

Can you elaborate or prove me wrong? .


As I was saying.... :rolleyes:

You never say. Thats the whole reason you are a joke. Post where I said Blacks created everything. Prove where I have not spoken truth. Otherwise you are as usual a spineless wonder that will not take a stand. :lol:
 
RKMBrown remains a ContentLESS Lying TROLL here contributing Nothing whatsoever, unlike Everyone else.

Kindly Post ON TOPIC.

And NOTE: NO ONE Has answered/addressed the CONTENT of my post, merely hurled insult.

`

I addressed the content of the OP. You are just to ignorant to understand the OP and/or my response to it.


He is a rookie Stormfront drone. We can rehabilitate him. We have the technology. :lol:

Eugenics?
 

Even Tank has caught on. Ingenuity is evident and a integral part of being black. Now who would have ever thought of that? :lol:
Ingenuity would preclude the necessity in this case.

Anyway Asc, I understand your desperation. Sub-Saharan Africa was not the only region to have no recorded history until the arrivals of outsiders. It was the fate of those who never developed alphabets or other systems of recording. It is no reason to be embarrassed. Other such peoples such as Amerinds are too proud to try to appropriate the history of others.

Take solace in the fact even though white men arrived to exploit sub-Saharan Africa, they left a systems to allow black history to begin.
 

Even Tank has caught on. Ingenuity is evident and a integral part of being black. Now who would have ever thought of that? :lol:
Ingenuity would preclude the necessity in this case.

Anyway Asc, I understand your desperation. Sub-Saharan Africa was not the only region to have no recorded history until the arrivals of outsiders. It was the fate of those who never developed alphabets or other systems of recording. It is no reason to be embarrassed. Other such peoples such as Amerinds are too proud to try to appropriate the history of others.

Take solace in the fact even though white men arrived to exploit sub-Saharan Africa, they left a systems to allow black history to begin.

There you white people go again thinking what you call recorded history is the end all be all. Its a running joke in other ethnicities of color that you guys are too stupid to realize that history is recorded in other ways as well. Regardless, when one disputes DNA evidence you have pretty much reduced yourself to the epitome of ignorance. DNA evidence ends all arguments except for those that are truly the ones that are desperate. Those tiny few usually wind up in nursing homes being cared for by the people they were so eager to hate. :lol:
 
Without DNA most blacks would not know who their fathers are
 
Its [sic] a running joke in other ethnicities [sic] of color that you guys are too stupid to realize that history is recorded in other ways as well.



No, it's not.
 
If it were not for DNA most white people would still not believe their forefathers were Black African Bushmen.



There you go again, making patently illogical statements.
 
You seem to think that I care what you or other racist white people accept. I don't. I'm just telling you so you are aware of it as well. I cannot force you not to be ignorant.



There you go again. When your 'arguments' fall apart or you are called out to support your claims you either lie outright or whine, "I don't care what you think!" like some petulant child.


Every. Single. Time.
 
Its [sic] a running joke in other ethnicities [sic] of color that you guys are too stupid to realize that history is recorded in other ways as well.



No, it's not.
But it is. Denying it doesn't make your wish true. Proving I'm wrong would be better. You cant though because you have no depth. Youre about as substantial as a puddle in the desert.
 
You seem to think that I care what you or other racist white people accept. I don't. I'm just telling you so you are aware of it as well. I cannot force you not to be ignorant.



There you go again. When your 'arguments' fall apart or you are called out to support your claims you either lie outright or whine, "I don't care what you think!" like some petulant child.


Every. Single. Time.

Except my argument didn't fall apart. DNA is factual and proves the Egyptians were Black Africans. I dont care to debate someone arguing against it. Are you too claiming that the Egyptians were not Black or is it In your desperation to try and show me up you sided with a racist? Yet you claim to not be a racist. Lets look at the entire exchange you conveniently left out Unk. Told you I would bring your closet racism to light Unk. You are now busted for all to see. :lol:

Fail! Egyptians shared little in common with sub-Saharan blacks but a huge continent. Egypt was far, far closer to those countries which developed the earliest civilizations than to the very distant sub-Saharan Africa.

I can't imagine anyone reasonably informed on the history of mankind and geography could accept any significant contribution to any civilization originating from backward peoples so far away.

Except for a couple of painfully obvious errors on your part. DNA shows the Egyptians were more sub saharan than myself just like they claimed for 1. I cant imagine anyone with even an iota of intelligence not knowing that by now.

Your other error is lack of knowledge about what white greek historians say. They also claimed the Egyptians were black.

You must be severely confused. i understand European lies and omission of the facts have left you ignorant to true history. That was planned and has been repeated throught history since the white man first understood the importance of Egypt in the development of todays knowledge base.
Give it a rest! Nobody is going to accept that "blacks" had the intelligence to do it in antiquity anymore than they have today, unless you believe in "devolution".

You seem to think that I care what you or other racist white people accept. I don't. I'm just telling you so you are aware of it as well. I cannot force you not to be ignorant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom