Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
It strikes me as pretty dishonest to judge a religion based on such a selective representative population. If one were to judge Christianity based on the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides from the 90s or based on the ideological systems of the LRA then one might come to the same conclusion concerning Christianity, and that would likewise be entriely dishonest and unfair.
We have the brutal life of the Warlord Muhammad, far closer to Genghis Khan than Jesus Christ in actions, to judge. We have 1,400 hundred years of brutality and horror to judge Islam on.
Even Bosnia was a reaction to the terror of Islam infesting the country. Boko Harum and ISIS are closer to the acts of Muhammad than is a PR agent for CAIR.
Then explain the treaty of Hudaybiyyah.
Didn't Muhammad subsequently murder the Quraish? Muhammad played for time, as any competent Warlord would. Muhammad was a brutal psychopath, but I never suggested that he was not a good general.