You, being the gutless pussy you are, ducked it last time, but the question really shouldn't be ducked in your typically pussy fashion. So, let's try it again, menstrual-mess:
all testimony (under oath) by all witnesses at all trials would qualify {under your daffynition} as mere "claims."
If I see you run a red light and strike a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk with the light, when I testify at your trial, you CAN question my bias (the fact that I consider you a gutless lying pussy
is a bias, after all) and you can question my accuracy or my honesty. But the fact that your dinged car has traces of the pedestrian's blood on it does tend to corroborate a good deal of my testimony as does the fact of his injury at that location as noted by the EMTs who came to his aid.
Thus, you calling my testimony a mere "claim" would NOT undermine the fact that I can attest to what I saw. And in this case, it would be a "fact" regardless of the fact that you don't like it. [In a very technical sense, it is not a fact until the jury makes a finding of fact derived from all of the evidence, but then it does become legally a "fact."]
Similarly, you fucking retard, when the United Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville on 9/11/2001, bits and pieces of that wrecked craft DID later get recovered FROM that very spot (and surrounding area). Contemporaneous photographs do establish as much. The FBI (i.e., the eyewitnesses) did report that about 95% of the wrecked craft got recovered. Their estimate can be attacked as the product of bias (but you have no evidence demonstrating any actual bias). You can, if you feel the need, question their honesty or accuracy, but you have NOTHING to which you can point to make the questioning legitimately based.
In short, there is no valid, logical, coherent reason to DOUBT that FBI estimate that it was 95% of the craft that got recovered. If you have a good reason to contend that their estimate that the amount of the plane that got recovered is equal to ~ 95%, then feel free to demonstrate it. But you won't any more now than you ever have before, because you can't.
In the end, you can try to hide behind your dishonest pretense that you are "only asking questions," but your credibility is so shot,
menstrual mess, that your pretense fools nobody. And what that all comes down to is simple:
there remains NOT ONE SINGLE SOLITARY RATIONAL reason to doubt the FBI report that they had recovered 95% of Flight 93's wreckage.
Prove me wrong,
menstrual mess.