Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
I'm sure Bull is gobsmacked by the mere suggestion that Hillary would do such a thing.So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?
Well, maybe for the cause! It is said the Foundation does a lot of good around the world in terms of healthcare and education. I know the Clinton's have capitalized on their name and used it as leverage for their Foundation. And they know where the money is, know whom to hit up. That's an advantage for fund raisers. The difference between you and me is that I do not believe most of it went into their pockets, as is the common theme song among supporters of the pure and pristine Donald who wouldn't dream of deflecting charitable funds into his own ..ummm..portrait? The Clinton unhidden tax records shed some light. I believe they are available for your perusal too.So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
Yes they do....about 5% of the money went to anything charitable.....Well, maybe for the cause! It is said the Foundation does a lot of good around the world in terms of healthcare and education. I know the Clinton's have capitalized on their name and used it as leverage for their Foundation. And they know where the money is, know whom to hit up. That's an advantage for fund raisers. The difference between you and me is that I do not believe most of it went into their pockets, as is the common theme song among supporters of the pure and pristine Donald who wouldn't dream of deflecting charitable funds into his own ..ummm..portrait? The Clinton unhidden tax records shed some light. I believe they are available for your perusal too.So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
We already did.....you're slow.....Oh no! This is it! Someone call the FBI!!
Well, maybe for the cause!So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
Use you head. Do you give away 1 million expecting NOTHING in return? The CGI is funded by foreign interests and you have no problem with that?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
I presume you have proof of that.Yes they do....about 5% of the money went to anything charitable.....Well, maybe for the cause! It is said the Foundation does a lot of good around the world in terms of healthcare and education. I know the Clinton's have capitalized on their name and used it as leverage for their Foundation. And they know where the money is, know whom to hit up. That's an advantage for fund raisers. The difference between you and me is that I do not believe most of it went into their pockets, as is the common theme song among supporters of the pure and pristine Donald who wouldn't dream of deflecting charitable funds into his own ..ummm..portrait? The Clinton unhidden tax records shed some light. I believe they are available for your perusal too.So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
The tax returns you mentioned...I presume you have proof of that.Yes they do....about 5% of the money went to anything charitable.....Well, maybe for the cause! It is said the Foundation does a lot of good around the world in terms of healthcare and education. I know the Clinton's have capitalized on their name and used it as leverage for their Foundation. And they know where the money is, know whom to hit up. That's an advantage for fund raisers. The difference between you and me is that I do not believe most of it went into their pockets, as is the common theme song among supporters of the pure and pristine Donald who wouldn't dream of deflecting charitable funds into his own ..ummm..portrait? The Clinton unhidden tax records shed some light. I believe they are available for your perusal too.So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
No amount of proof will ever get you to remove your tongue from Hillary's asshole'.I presume you have proof of that.Yes they do....about 5% of the money went to anything charitable.....Well, maybe for the cause! It is said the Foundation does a lot of good around the world in terms of healthcare and education. I know the Clinton's have capitalized on their name and used it as leverage for their Foundation. And they know where the money is, know whom to hit up. That's an advantage for fund raisers. The difference between you and me is that I do not believe most of it went into their pockets, as is the common theme song among supporters of the pure and pristine Donald who wouldn't dream of deflecting charitable funds into his own ..ummm..portrait? The Clinton unhidden tax records shed some light. I believe they are available for your perusal too.So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
Lies noted.Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
I guess that would depend on to whom you give the 1 million. If you give it to March of Dimes or St Jude or Shriner's Hospitals, I would presume you expect nothing in return except a tax credit. I believe there is an outfit called Charity Navigator that monitors charities. You could look up the Clinton Foundation. If I do it for you, you could always claim I found a biased site, but if you check it out it would be better. Nevermind posting a conclusion, just look to satisfy yourself.Use you head. Do you give away 1 million expecting NOTHING in return? The CGI is funded by foreign interests and you have no problem with that?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.In case you missed it.
Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
While I agree with what you have posted you have done nothing but give the left more reason to love corrupt Hillary. The left loves nothing better than to force their will onto everyone else. Especially when their will is in the minority. How else can it be explained their stated distaste for war yet their support for the war hawk Hillary? It can't be except they love division and hate.No amount of proof will ever get you to remove your tongue from Hillary's asshole'.I presume you have proof of that.Yes they do....about 5% of the money went to anything charitable.....Well, maybe for the cause! It is said the Foundation does a lot of good around the world in terms of healthcare and education. I know the Clinton's have capitalized on their name and used it as leverage for their Foundation. And they know where the money is, know whom to hit up. That's an advantage for fund raisers. The difference between you and me is that I do not believe most of it went into their pockets, as is the common theme song among supporters of the pure and pristine Donald who wouldn't dream of deflecting charitable funds into his own ..ummm..portrait? The Clinton unhidden tax records shed some light. I believe they are available for your perusal too.So, what would be the reason for such a payment other than buying influence?Billy, as I read the link, I tried to figure your point. There was no 'cause/effect' that I could see. No 'Qatar gave X, and got X in return' link. Then, further on, I read this from the article: "Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect". Note the "may have" which becomes "sure did" in the minds of Trumpists.
This time the FBI has the Clinton Crime INC dead to rights.
It's irrelevant whether Hillary is elected President or not.
It's irrelevant whether Hillary is then impeached or not.
The Clinton legacy has been written by themselves and read by the American public.
There's never been a more despised political couple in American history.
They both have one foot in the grave.
Someday they'll both be dead no matter how much money they grifted.
That's good enough for me.
