I don't think it's as clear cut as that, the underworld of manufactured disinformation. It's not like Qanon announces something with their signature on it. Things get said spread, re-said. A lot of it isn't on news sites (unless it's reporting directly on Qanon) but in social media and a lot of people seem to get their information from there. I don't think it's as clear as saying right leaning sites support QAnon or don't support QAnon...but if they're spreading their disinformation then they're inadvertently supporting them.
I would argue that QAnon doesn't have rights to any kind of information. How does QAnon have ownership of it? Inadvertently supporting them? ***Is this like allowing sexual predictors into bathrooms that are not their sex? That type of inadvertent support? Sure, there aren't many of them out there, but they are there... Right?
If you support
people using bathrooms of their chosen gender, does that mean you support
sexual predictors?
If you support
the belief of election fraud, does that mean you support
QAnon?
***I'm not saying that's your position... Just trying to make the point.
No, imo, the Russian investigation itself was not spreading disinformation, but outside of it you had funky conspiracy theory claims being manufactured and spread.
Well... That's how I see this. An election investigation, but with an outside body doing conspiracy theory claims being manufactured and spread.
QAnon is my opposition as much as it is any lefty defines it as theirs... More so in some ways.