ESay
Gold Member
- Mar 14, 2015
- 9,555
- 2,080
- 140
Ivan, are you drunk again?we created Ukraine, we are responsible for possible danger it may pose to the World and have full right and obligation to destroy it if it goes mad and betrays fatherland..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ivan, are you drunk again?we created Ukraine, we are responsible for possible danger it may pose to the World and have full right and obligation to destroy it if it goes mad and betrays fatherland..
Becoming the 51st state of the US. Joke.Sure. But what is the lesser evil from your point of view?
What if it is not possible? I mean it is really difficult and unprofitable to rule Ukraine (at least in its current condition) and the EU can't just accepted forty million of refugees. So, what if your choice is simple - go to, say, Belgorod as a migrant, or to invite Russia to annex Chernigov region and make it a part of Russia?Becoming the 51st state of the US. Joke.
If seriously, some kind of a direct external rule.
Don't judge a book by its cover. Vika is just a political animal and a clowness. She decides nothing and just showing off.Esay, did you hear a joke?
Victoria Nuland, participating in some event in Kiev said than many Russians would like to live in a country like yours (i e. Ukraine), and would like to make what is going on in your country to happen in Russia"..
can you imagine the level of inadequacy and self hypnosis of American establishment?
though, you share this very level of inadequacy, being a shithole country which you admit is a failed state you tend to repeatedly demonstrate your sence of superiority.
it looks funny, of course, but again makes me bow to the magical power of propaganda...
Who said anything about fortifications? Patton once said:The EU realizes it can't rely on America for protection. Now it has a blueprint for a new joint military force | CNN
The chaos at the border between Poland and Belarus is just the latest incident to get top brass in Brussels pondering what the European Union should do long-term about its internal security.edition.cnn.com
video (11m) about how Putin is making a red-line out of losing Ukraine to the west and seeing it (like Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) fortified by the west, what i publicly label here as a dangerous and total waste of defense tax money by the west, which is something that's and about to spring into high gear in both the Russian-NW and Russian-SW NATO-Russia fronts..
as a representative (citizen, actually) of The Netherlands and thus the EU and our UK friends, i formally object to this western fortification effort along Russia's western border (and, if this were to include Ukraine, open 2 very short land routes to the main Russian population centers.
because the only thing that that would achieve is a real need for the Russians to increase their arsenals as well,
and with that the risk of real conflict only increases.
if both sides have a massive arsenal of some type of weaponry pointed at eachother, it can promote and secure peace, like nuclear weapons do.
but it's utter political and military hubris and idiocy to think you can fortify 2 very wide fronts to your long time adversary's main population centers with military bases containing nearly every weapon type out there. that sh!t is just unacceptable, to anyone with even half a brain, and regardless of their profession too.
I am sure it was due to the goodness in their heart and not the number of US troops stationed there!well, i'm happy i can trust your leaders more than you.
they never actually posed a threat to western europe, and they gave the populations of eastern europe (largely speaking) a choice for self-determination.
I thought I already made it clear that these two options are unacceptable for me.What if it is not possible? I mean it is really difficult and unprofitable to rule Ukraine (at least in its current condition) and the EU can't just accepted forty million of refugees. So, what if your choice is simple - go to, say, Belgorod as a migrant, or to invite Russia to annex Chernigov region and make it a part of Russia?
It's not your decision. Have a nice day!I thought I already made it clear that these two options are unacceptable for me.
What do you mean? That Ukraine doesn't decide on its own fate? Yes, that is true, unfortunately.It's not your decision. Have a nice day!
Yeah, and this meaning will be getting out of this place as far as possible.lol, have a nice independence
have patience, brother, after coming reunification with Russia your life will have meaning again..
Try to use logic, if you are accustomed with this word. If I want to keep myself as far as possible from Russia, then why would I want to move to 'proper' Russia?I presume to proper Russia? Europe will close boders in front of you, beggars...
wow, I left such a remarkable statement without a proper joke!!..Becoming the 51st state of the US. Joke.
If seriously, some kind of a direct external rule.
You said:What do you mean? That Ukraine doesn't decide on its own fate? Yes, that is true, unfortunately.
lol, stop humiliating Ukraine, Esay already admitted he knows Ukraine is just an object of others' game, he just wants to find someone to feed Ukraine for free in exchange of ruling Ukraine.You said:
"I thought I already made it clear that these two options are unacceptable for me.'
Are you Ukraine? It is not your option!
That all depends on what you consider as a nation. I bet you can't give a coherent answer.probably because you're Russian.
or do you insist that Ukrainians are a real nation?