Pushing back against perversions and deviancy

[scruffy]

Um, yeah, because the poor darlings are suffering so much... um... no, they really aren't.

The funny thing is, you dumb ass white people blame minorities and gays for what other white people with more money are doing to you.

View attachment 654879

You stupid retarded leftist, the only reason Trump won in the first place is cause Hitlery is such a monster.

You want to talk about deluded minions?

Let's talk about Bernie Sanders and his poor deluded socialists, who just got thrown under the bus TWICE by Hitlery, and took it lying down

 

[JoeB131]

You stupid retarded leftist, the only reason Trump won in the first place is cause Hitlery is such a monster.

Trump didn't win. He lost by 3 million votes.

Let's talk about Bernie Sanders and his poor deluded socialists, who just got thrown under the bus TWICE by Hitlery, and took it lying down

Actually, I don't think that there ever were that many "Bernie Socialists". I think a lot of people voted for Bernie because they didn't like Hillary. Some of them stayed home, some of them voted for third parties and some of them even voted for Trump.

 

[scruffy]

Trump didn't win. He lost by 3 million votes.

Yes, idiot, TRUMP WON.

Because we are NOT ruled by the mob.

In spite of your fucked up progtard fantasies.

Actually, I don't think that there ever were that many "Bernie Socialists". I think a lot of people voted for Bernie because they didn't like Hillary. Some of them stayed home, some of them voted for third parties and some of them even voted for Trump.

So minimize the importance of the #2 Democratic candidate getting thrown under the bus

Got it.

Progs don't even care about their own

Got it

 

[JoeB131]

Yes, idiot, TRUMP WON.

Because we are NOT ruled by the mob.

In spite of your fucked up progtard fantasies.

The people said no. They rejected him.
The people said no again in 2018 when they voted in a Democratic House.
They said no again in 2020, when he lost by 8 million votes.

That we are still using an 18th century anachronism to choose presidents in defiance of the will of the people is nothing to be proud of.

So minimize the importance of the #2 Democratic candidate getting thrown under the bus

When was he thrown under the bus? Frankly, the guy has enjoyed more influence in the last 5 years than he did in his previous 30 in Congress accomplishing not much of anything. And the guy isn't even actually a Democrat.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

That we are still using an 18th century anachronism to choose presidents in defiance of the will of the people is nothing to be proud of.

That you disagree with the rules that the great men who founded this nation wisely set up for electing Congress and the President, that you are incapable of understanding the wisdom in this system, does not invalidate it.

There were very good reasons for the way this was done; they were good reasons back then, and even more so now.

You're crying because you hate the legitimate outcome of some recent elections, and you want the rules to be changed to produce the outcome that you wanted.

That's not how it works. Not unless you can drum up enough support to get the Constitution amended to change the rules to the way you wish they were.

Good luck with that.

 

[DBA]

Racism is America's original sin. We need to address it, as it permeates every facet of our nation.

No, not really, but it is made front and center by folks like you that bring it up incessently when things don’t align with your ideology.

So, um, yeah, if Angry Dad at a school board who threatened to kill the school board members because his slut daughter was having hookups with the trans-kid in the girls bathroom wanted a gun, that probably SHOULD get a bit of scrutiny.

Wow, biased much? It wasn’t dad’s who threatened to kill school board members that were put on the FBI watch list by this corrupt, incompetent AG. Also, the wonderfully innocent, white as washed snow trans-kid raped the girl in the bathroom you dolt.

Actually, they were probably never under threat. Our bloated defense spending and we got rolled by two third world countries, that's nothing to be proud of.

Most of our EU allies thought one of those was a terrible idea.

Democrats were largely responsible for our “loss” in Vietnam. We had the military might to completely oblibeterate them, but instead we slow played it. God forbid we piss off the wonderfully patriotic Jane Fonda and John Kerry’s of the world.

The US protects Europe. After the Afganistan debacle, I imagaine they are all wondering of big daddy will actually be there for them if needed. Maybe those countries will need to grow up and realize that the fantasy world they live in where they is only made possible because somebody else(the US) has their back. If the US backed out of NATO, Russia would take all of Europe. They are even more naive that you lefties who have bought into their pollyanna, utopian ideal.

So you hate them, got it.

I specifically stated NOT to hate them, but in our mind that means I said to hate them. This is typical in your world. Black is white and up is down. You need help.

Yes, you seem to have some inadequacy issues. But I can't think of a shrink I dislike enough to wish you on.

Says the person who consistently calls me Cletus claims I live in a double wide. If that was the case, I would be much better off promoting Democratic ideals…you know, more stimulus, raising taxes on the “rich“ to give to me, “free” pre-school, “free” healthcare”, etc, etc, etc. See that would be YOU that is for all of these things.

Yeah, a look in the mirror may do you some good.

Never heard of a gang banger named "Bob".

Exactly the point. Bob is a white sounding name. Jamal is a black sounding name. You chose Jamal because, in your mind, gang bangers are mostly black. If most gang bangers are black, according to you, does this mean you are more likely to be on the lookout for Jamal rather than Bob when at the ATM at night? Your own logic would dictate that this is the case. Does this make you a racist? Your white guilt is showing again.

 

[JoeB131]

That you disagree with the rules that the great men who founded this nation wisely set up for electing Congress and the President, that you are incapable of understanding the wisdom in this system, does not invalidate it.

Your logic is circular, guy... "We've always done it this way" has been used to excuse a whole bunch of bad things, from burning witches to slavery.

THere is really no good reason why we can't directly elect the president today, which is how every other civilized country does it.

There were very good reasons for the way this was done; they were good reasons back then, and even more so now.

Their good reasons were that they thought the power should be held ONLY by the landed gentry. These weren't good reasons, and they certainly don't work today.

You're crying because you hate the legitimate outcome of some recent elections, and you want the rules to be changed to produce the outcome that you wanted.

Okay, here's the thing. Before 2000, this was a moot issue, because for the previous 112 years, the guy who won the popular vote won the EC.

We've had two occassions where that didn't happen, and both of them (Bush-43 and Trump) were unmitigated disasters as president.

The people got it right. These guys weren't fit to be president, and they went on to prove it.

hat's not how it works. Not unless you can drum up enough support to get the Constitution amended to change the rules to the way you wish they were.

Eventually, people will get tired of this awful system.. if this country even lasts... I'm less and less sure it deserves to.

 

[scruffy]

The people said no. They rejected him.
The people said no again in 2018 when they voted in a Democratic House.
They said no again in 2020, when he lost by 8 million votes.

That we are still using an 18th century anachronism to choose presidents in defiance of the will of the people is nothing to be proud of.

You're a complete fucking idiot.

You'll be bleating a different time when the 'cons are back in power.

Which will be just a few short months.

When was he thrown under the bus? Frankly, the guy has enjoyed more influence in the last 5 years than he did in his previous 30 in Congress accomplishing not much of anything. And the guy isn't even actually a Democrat.

Ignorant, too

Figures

 

[JoeB131]

Wow, biased much? It wasn’t dad’s who threatened to kill school board members that were put on the FBI watch list by this corrupt, incompetent AG. Also, the wonderfully innocent, white as washed snow trans-kid raped the girl in the bathroom you dolt.

You mean the girl he had two previous sexual encounters with in that same bathroom. What happened there wasn't rape, it was relationship abuse, and yes, it's bad and all, but it had nothing to do with Trans policy, and if Angry Dad had been paying more attention to what his daughter was up to, it probably wouldn't have happened.

But lets start throwing punches as cops at school board meetings. It's not like they are going to shoot him. He's white.

Democrats were largely responsible for our “loss” in Vietnam. We had the military might to completely oblibeterate them, but instead we slow played it. God forbid we piss off the wonderfully patriotic Jane Fonda and John Kerry’s of the world.

I wasn't talking about Vietnam (I guess that would be THREE third world countries that rolled us, then), I was talking about Iraq and Afghanistan. The reason why the public stopped supporting Vietnam was because 1) The government lied to them about what we were doing over there and 2) they were tired of sending their kids over while people like Trump, Cheney, Bush, Limbaugh, Gingrich found creative ways to avoid a war they were cheering for.

The US protects Europe. After the Afganistan debacle, I imagaine they are all wondering of big daddy will actually be there for them if needed. Maybe those countries will need to grow up and realize that the fantasy world they live in where they is only made possible because somebody else(the US) has their back. If the US backed out of NATO, Russia would take all of Europe. They are even more naive that you lefties who have bought into their pollyanna, utopian ideal.

Wow, really? I'm sorry, I'm kind of glad Biden pulled the plug on the Forever War. We've been over there for 20 years and spent a Trillion dollars and the Afghan People were just welcoming the Taliban back. What was the point of any of it?

I specifically stated NOT to hate them, but in our mind that means I said to hate them. This is typical in your world. Black is white and up is down. You need help.

The fact is, you want to discriminate against them, you call them mentally ill, you want to punish teachers for merely acknowledging their existence.

Says the person who consistently calls me Cletus claims I live in a double wide. If that was the case, I would be much better off promoting Democratic ideals…you know, more stimulus, raising taxes on the “rich“ to give to me, “free” pre-school, “free” healthcare”, etc, etc, etc. See that would be YOU that is for all of these things.

Yeah, a look in the mirror may do you some good.

Oh, you are like most white trash, you are fine with the "White Welfare" that benefits you. - Social Security, Medicare, etc. It's just the thought of the darkies getting free stuff that infuriates you.

Exactly the point. Bob is a white sounding name. Jamal is a black sounding name. You chose Jamal because, in your mind, gang bangers are mostly black. If most gang bangers are black, according to you, does this mean you are more likely to be on the lookout for Jamal rather than Bob when at the ATM at night? Your own logic would dictate that this is the case. Does this make you a racist? Your white guilt is showing again.

Well, I wouldn't go to an ATM at night... that's the thing.... My point was that when you have vouchers, the elite schools that don't have to take Jamal now will have to take him in the future...

 

[JoeB131]

You're a complete fucking idiot.

You'll be bleating a different time when the 'cons are back in power.

Which will be just a few short months.

Oh, you guys might retake congress... and then you'll proceed to remind the country how nuts you are.

Which is what you did in 2011, it's what you did in 1995.

You never fucking learn.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Your logic is circular, guy... "We've always done it this way" has been used to excuse a whole bunch of bad things, from burning witches to slavery.

For over two centuries, it has produced better results than a straight democracy would have produced. You only disagree because you do not like the results that it has sometimes produced.

Their good reasons were that they thought the power should be held ONLY by the landed gentry. These weren't good reasons, and they certainly don't work today.

That was never it.

They recognized that the needs of people in large, densely-populated sates were different than those in smaller, sparsely-populated states.

The intent in the way that Congress is structured, and the Electoral College, was to insure that those in the smaller, less-dense states had representation that wouldn't be drowned out by the larger, denser states.

The stratification, now, is much greater than it was, then, and so is the need even greater to make sure that those living in more rural areas have a fair voice.

If you had your way, then a few large, heavily-populated areas would have the only meaningful representation.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Isn't it interesting to note the correlation between the bad behavior that Incel Joe will defend, and for which it will make all sorts of bullshit excuses, and the behavior of which it prolifically hurls false accusations at its opponents?

Also, the wonderfully innocent, white as washed snow trans-kid raped the girl in the bathroom you dolt.

You mean the girl he had two previous sexual encounters with in that same bathroom. What happened there wasn't rape, it was relationship abuse, and yes, it's bad and all, but it had nothing to do with Trans policy, and if Angry Dad had been paying more attention to what his daughter was up to, it probably wouldn't have happened.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The fact is, you want to discriminate against them, you call them mentally ill, you want to punish teachers for merely acknowledging their existence.

As a matter of hard reality, they •ARE• mentally ill. Pandering to their delusions, and forcing others to play along, is harmful to everyone involved.

 

[scruffy]

Oh, you guys might retake congress... and then you'll proceed to remind the country how nuts you are.

Which is what you did in 2011, it's what you did in 1995.

You never fucking learn.

Who the fuck are you talking to, fleabrain?

You dumb fucking assholes just don't get it, do you?

You blew it. Everyone's dogpiling on you. Left, right, or indifferent, everyone hates your guts. You're at the bottom of the heap.

Once it gets painful enough down there, you'll change your ways. Either that or you'll suffocate.

Personally I'm hoping for Door #2. I'd like to see progtards in the bonepile of political history along with the Neo-Cons.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Oh, you guys might retake congress... and then you'll proceed to remind the country how nuts you are.

Right. We'll see supply shortages, runaway inflation, and other serious economic harm, gasoline costing as much as nearly ten-dollars a gallon in some places, criminals being set free, or never prosecuted to begin with, depraved perversions being groomed and brainwashed into little children, and so on.

Oh, wait; that's your side doing all this, isn't it?

 

[Sandisk]

Federal court rules Kansas teacher can speak according to her religious beliefs regarding transgender students

www.msn.com

Not long ago, a well-respected news caster told a long time coworker that her new dress and accessories were very nice. It was an honest compliment that both men and women have paid to each other for generations. Whether it be a fellow with a snazzy new suit or a gal with a snazzy new dress. A young me2 radical was across the room and overheard the compliment. The little biotch filed a complaint and the man with 20+ years of career was fired. The woman he paid the compliment to was horrified, they had been friends for years, and she took the honest compliment as it was intended. Two adults conversing and saying nice things to each other. But it didn't matter that the conversations was as harmless as a little white fluffy cloud on a blue sky day. The Biotch's complaint was all that mattered.

Now these deviants are trying to silence all words that do not goose step with their total perversions. Schools are trying to tell teachers they must hide students "pronouns" from their parents. Who is confusing these kids? Who is grooming these kids to even know they should be choosing different pronouns? The deviants and the socialists who want to destroy this country and destroy manhood's and masculinity, thats who

If these people cannot kill the baby in the womb, they will destroy their sanity in early childhood, and if that doesn't work these lousy blankety blanks will convince little boys to question why they even have a little dinger and convince them to call themselves girls.

One teacher has the moral fortitude to be honest with the parents of the children she teaches and the entire left wing of America has a full blown head explosion. God bless the teachers who are willing to risk it al to let parents know what's going on in the schools. Do not let the socialist's new campaign rhetoric change the subject of how they are destroying our nation and the entire social dignity the people who live here. Parents have the right to control their childrens education and SCIENCE dictates that there are two genders.

Its past time to push back very hard on these deviants, It's past time to push back on these people who want to defund and abolish the police. Its past time to tell the socialists to go have sex with themselves. Yes its hard for those of us who have jobs and respect the requirements of being responsible people, but we have to get into the streets and be as aggressive as these deviants are. If we don't then America is dead your children will be subject to the worst types of people that ever lived, controlling their every actions, every thought and even every meal. We must be aggressive, but obey the laws as we do so. Thats how we stop them.

Parents have the right to know what their children are being taught, and what they are doing in school. Groomers have a right to three hots and a cot, or three swats of a wooden Louisville Slugger to the forehead. They want choice? Let that be their choice. If they don't like those choices they can just teach the three R's and quit abusing our children. Oh and may god damn them for what they are currently doing.

Where in the Constitution does it say that parents have the right to know EVERYTHING that their children are being taught?

If morons like you appear to be, are allowed to dictate what children are taught?
Then it would be IMPOSSIBLE to teach children anything...for fear of pissing off some, thin-skinned doofus/PC imbecile/religious nut who doesn't want his son/daughter being taught such and such.

DUH!!!

 

[DBA]

Right. We'll see supply shortages, runaway inflation, and other serious economic harm, gasoline costing as much as nearly ten-dollars a gallon in some places, criminals being set free, or never prosecuted to begin with, depraved perversions being groomed and brainwashed into little children, and so on.

Oh, wait; that's your side doing all this, isn't it?

Trust the professional resume writer. He knows exactly what he is talking about. Us poor white trash folks that vote Republican don't have a clue. I do find that little strange since Republicans are supposed to be the party of the rich. Oh well, I guess the use whatever argument suits them at the time.

 

[Sandisk]

Who the fuck are you talking to, fleabrain?

You dumb fucking assholes just don't get it, do you?

You blew it. Everyone's dogpiling on you. Left, right, or indifferent, everyone hates your guts. You're at the bottom of the heap.

Once it gets painful enough down there, you'll change your ways. Either that or you'll suffocate.

Personally I'm hoping for Door #2. I'd like to see progtards in the bonepile of political history along with the Neo-Cons.

Not that I agree or even care what you two are bitching about.

But your post is absolutely pathetic.

First...you accuse this person of being stupid.
Yet you clearly are none-too-bright as your lack of knowledge of punctuation exposes.

Second...you claim to speak for the entire, fucking world - when you cannot even, speak properly for yourself.

And third...you show what a sick, vicious whacko you are by openly hoping that this person dies.
For NO other reason than you have a political difference of opinion.
What kind of a human maggot wishes a painful death to an (apparently) law-abiding person, purely on the basis of political differences of opinion?
Look in the mirror - it's you.

You sir, are clearly uneducated, probably possess a low IQ and are obviously, mentally unstable.

And do not bother replying to me...because you are not worth my time and I shall not read your reply.
Though, were I to, I would no doubt, derive much humor from it.

Bye you ignorant, (probably) have-a-crush-on-your-sister/mother, sicko.

 

[scruffy]

Not that I agree or even care what you two are bitching about.

But your post is absolutely pathetic.

First...you accuse this person of being stupid.
Yet you clearly are none-too-bright as your lack of knowledge of punctuation exposes.

Second...you claim to speak for the entire, fucking world - when you cannot even speak properly for yourself.

And third...you show what a sick, vicious whacko you are by openly hoping that this person dies.
For NO other reason than you have a political difference of opinion.
What kind of a human maggot wishes a painful death to an (apparently) law-abiding person, purely on the basis of political differences of opinion?
Look in the mirror - it's you.

You sir, are clearly uneducated, probably possess a low IQ and are obviously, mentally unstable.

And do not bother replying to me...because you are not worth my time and I shall not read your reply.
Though, were I to, I would no doubt, derive much humor from it.

Bye you ignorant, (probably) have-a-crush-on-your-sister/mother sicko.

Thank you for putting me on ignore.

Please don't talk to me ever again. Thank you.

 

[Sandisk]

Thank you for putting me on ignore.

Please don't talk to me ever again. Thank you.

You can always tell a self-opinionated person when after someone else telling them, that they will not read their reply?
The former types one anyway.

And no, I did not read your reply.
But I did see that you made one.

Bye now.