Proto-Aryan people

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
Although the Aryans were a very prominent culture, the Aryan people were not a very large population.
Initially, their cultures covered only part of central Siberia.


However, there is reason to talk about the proto-Aryan people. which apparently covered all of America and much of Asia. This is identified primarily by the area of distribution of Shamanism that covered these regions, as well as by a specific type of women, with muscular narrow hips and buttocks, such as those who perform at carnivals in Latin America, they are also widely represented in North America in the West, in Central and Southeast Asia. and northern India. They have an Asian type of face, slanted eyes and raised eyebrows are common. Like that:

brazilia-na-tropicheskii-karnaval-v-rio-de-janeiro-tur-14387626020448_w687h357.jpg


They all have thick, elastic skin that tans easily, but obviously without the sun it becomes pale like that of the Mexicans. That is the usual tanning type of the skin like it have most Central Asians and Americans. They have a bronze tint, which distinguishes them from other swarthy races.



Their religion obviously gave birth to the Aryan Vedic religion itself, there was a lot about medicinal plants, there was a narcotic drink Soma, there was a cult of dead ancestors, a cult of the sky and forces of nature, there was music.

And all this did not cover Africa and Europe.

Therefore, even if a human comes from Africa, shamanic cultures separated very early and represent a separate branch of a human in evolution.

Perhaps the main phase of this development took place in America.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
By the way, in Southeast Asia, such carnivals are also held, similar to Latin American ones.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Is there anything known about whether the American Indian languages had melodic accent and inflections in the roots? The Aryan language had such a system; there were inflections, synthetic grammar and melodic accent - these are the main features.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Militancy and patriarchy can also speak about the relationship of these cultures. If I am not mistaken, the Indians of America were warlike and patriarchal.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
The shape of the skull is also the same. Most of them seem to be brachycephalic, the forehead is usually not high, but the crown is high and more pointed.

It is most common in Latinamerican and Indian woman. Sometimes a very high skull.

05e386e2dd81bfc946d38cc24e655046--belleza-latina-beauty-pageant.jpg
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
The thin and "eagle" shape of the nose is almost never found. The bridge of the nose is always straight, the thickness in the frontal projection always big enough. The tip of the nose is always round. The nostrils are always poorly marked. The size of the nose is almost from small to medium.

Age spots, freckles, almost always absent, hair on the body is apparently usually very weak.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Their eyes in general, I see, they are all slanted, of an oriental type, obviously slanted.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
There is no doubt. At a minimum, women represent a separate American-Asian race, separate from the African-European.
 
And the shape of the skull and skeleton is very reliable evidence. This is the most stable anthropological feature. Genetics also generally confirm this.
 
The shape of the skull is also the same. Most of them seem to be brachycephalic, the forehead is usually not high, but the crown is high and more pointed.

It is most common in Latinamerican and Indian woman. Sometimes a very high skull.

05e386e2dd81bfc946d38cc24e655046--belleza-latina-beauty-pageant.jpg
Who's looking at her skull? :banana:
 
Who's looking at her skull?
I painted portraits of women, so I noticed it. In addition, this can be understood by the fact that they often fall hair on the face.
They have separate problems with long hair. An observant person will notice this.

A low forehead is very common. In general, the height of the forehead is not more than average. And never round form

This form is very typical in America and India, but almost never found in Europe.

licensed-image
 
There are theories that reject the "general Eve". Here it is appropriate to consider them.
 
And they don't seem to have curly hair.
They only curl them with a perm, right?
 
Curly hair in general speaks of the identity of the old European and African people. Pigmentation spots also speak about the same. These are traces of degraded melanin, the same is found in albino blacks
 
And the shape of the skull and skeleton is very reliable evidence. This is the most stable anthropological feature. Genetics also generally confirm this.

Where do you get this stuff? My understanding is that we know very little about the Aryans. We know they were Caucasian people who spoke an Indo-European language and came from the steppes. Their ancestors can be found in India and Iran mostly. The word Iran is derived from the word Aryan. They were just one of many tribes from the steppes to invade South Asia, Europe, and China over thousands of years.
 
Where do you get this stuff? My understanding is that we know very little about the Aryans. We know they were Caucasian people
For example, it is known that in the north of India there was Aryavarta, the country of the Aryans. There are many women with such an anthropology. And even the cult of the cow remained there.

They are found in general everywhere where there were Aryan cultures. There are well-preserved burials of the ancient Tochars in the Tarim Basin, where even facial features are visible.

Genetics available from Y-full.

The name "Caucasians" is a political fake, just like the "white race".
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top