Actually, I'm right about everything I post.....
...especially this: "government schools brainwash children with totalitarian thought."
You wrote this about yourself: "Member of the Politburo."
Perhaps you meant ...'burro."
So, you believe in 'man-made global warming, with only global governance standing between us an disaster.'
But you're government schooled, totally brainwashed. How can you be right about everything in that case?
And yes, if thousands of climate scientists tell us we're screwing up the planet and we need to do something I tend to believe them.
I guess you're one of those believing that it is all an evil global conspiracy to get research funds and that there's nothing to worry about?
1. "But you're government schooled, totally brainwashed."
Although the second part of the sentence has no validity relative to the first part....it does indicate that you are an idiot.
2. "And yes, if thousands of climate scientists tell us we're screwing up the planet and we need to do something I tend to believe them."
That's because you're an idiot.
Proof?
Sure:
The biggest news story of the day is one that has barely begun to break and will continue to reverberate for months or years to come. Someone hacked into a computer at the University of East Anglia's Hadley Climatic Research Centre, one of the main centers of anthropogenic global warming research. The hacker downloaded over 200 megabytes of data from the server, consisting of around 1,000 emails and a variety of other documents. He uploaded them to an FTP server, where they were available to the public, apparently, for only a few hours. The event is described
here.
Before the documents disappeared from that location, several people had downloaded them and posted them in other locations. I downloaded all of the material earlier today and have begun to review it. The emails are stunning. They are authored by many of the leading figures in the global warming movement: Michael Mann, James Hansen, Phil Jones, Keith Briffa, Stephen Schneider, and others. They are remarkably candid; these individuals talk to each other with the knowledge that they are among friends.
They also suggest that pro-global warming scientists fudge data to get the results they are looking for. Just over a month ago, on September 28, 2009, Tom Wigley wrote to Phil Jones of the Hadley Centre about his efforts to get the right-sized "blip" in temperatures of the 1940s:
Phil, Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip. If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I'm sure you know). So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean -- but we'd still have to explain the land blip.
I've chosen 0.15 here deliberately. This still leaves an ocean blip, and i think one needs to have some form of ocean blip to explain the land blip (via either some common forcing, or ocean forcing land, or vice versa, or all of these). When you look at other blips, the land blips are 1.5 to 2 times (roughly) the ocean blips -- higher sensitivity plus thermal inertia effects. My 0.15 adjustment leaves things consistent with this, so you can see where I am coming from. Removing ENSO does not affect this.
It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with "why the blip".
Global Warming Bombshell Power Line
3. "I guess you're one of those believing that it is all an evil global conspiracy to get research funds and that there's nothing to worry about?"
See if you can connect these dots:
The UN is behind it, and the UN-supporters in our government.
The UN was formed based on Joseph Stalin's views, international socialism..."The U.N. charter was authored by a communist, the first U.N. Secretary-general was a communist, and the U.N., from the beginning, was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.
Stalin's spy, Alger Hiss was the leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminary planning for the U.N. was done. He was Roosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn (Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. (His death came only ten weeks later). At Yalta it was agreed that the Soviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one."
What The U.N. Doesn t Want You To Know
Wise up, you dope.