Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
My dear...don't pretend like I haven't run circles around you in the U.S. Constitution here. Everyone has seen it. And I'm sorry you find it embarrassing that you knew so little about that document (I really am). But your feelings don't change anything.No it doesn't sweetie - we've been through this before. Repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it any less of a lie.Because the U.S. Constitution makes defense the responsibility of the federal government. See how that works? Moron.Why don't you let the free market decide on North Korea?
as well as the general welfare....
thanks for playing
“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)If only you weren't so astoundingly ignorant of the U.S. Constitution, our founders, and American history, uh Jills?...and declare to be most false and unfounded, the doctrine that the [Constitution], in authorizing its federal branch to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, has given them thereby a power to do whatever they may think, or pretend, would promote the general welfare–which construction would make that of itself a complete government, without limitation of powers.… The plain sense and obvious meaning were that they might levy the taxes necessary to provide for the general welfare by the various acts of power therein specified and delegated to them, and by no others. – Thomas Jefferson (December 24, 1825)
if only you weren't. but as always it's adorable see you try to pretend you're not a moron.
*pats wackjob on head*
Great post, up till the "oppressed minority group like homosexuals" remark. You lost me at that. Homosexuals are mentally ill and deserve protection in the sense they need help with their illness or to stop persecution because of their illness. Like a schizophrenic or person with Alzheimer's. But a minority group? Now you are pushing credulity.People are standing up to groups and individuals that spread hate speech and who are widely condemned by every leader in our country including Trump. How can you compare that to an oppressed minority group like homosexuals?For the past 10 years or so we had to hear from progressives how businesses were not private. How they belonged to the government and/or the public. How serving the public meant they had no right to refuse service.
Yet the past few days, progressives had drowned social media celebrating stories of businesses who "serve the public" denying Nazi and/or white supremacist groups service. One was a restaurant. The big news today was ISP and cloud services denying their services to a website called "Daily Stormer" (apparently some white supremacist site).
So what happened? When a business owner wanted to refuse service to homosexuals based on their religious beliefs (fully protected by the U.S. Constitution), the left completely lost their shit. They insisted that it was "discrimination" and demanded that either the business be forced - at the barrel of a gun - to provide their products or services, or be run out of business.
And yet, when a business does the exact same thing to another group (for reasons not protected by the U.S. Constitution), all we hear from the fascists is "they have the right to refuse service".
This is what happens when views/ideologies are built from irrational emotion instead of logic and reason. There is an absurd contradiction and lack of consistency - which completely obliterates all credibility (hence the reason nobody takes the left seriously on anything).
What’s normal and natural to them is mentally ill to you, it really doesn’t matter though. What do you propose be done to help them. And please tell me you recognize the difference between Alzheimer’s/schizophrenia and homosexuality... I shouldn’t need to explain that to youGreat post, up till the "oppressed minority group like homosexuals" remark. You lost me at that. Homosexuals are mentally ill and deserve protection in the sense they need help with their illness or to stop persecution because of their illness. Like a schizophrenic or person with Alzheimer's. But a minority group? Now you are pushing credulity.People are standing up to groups and individuals that spread hate speech and who are widely condemned by every leader in our country including Trump. How can you compare that to an oppressed minority group like homosexuals?For the past 10 years or so we had to hear from progressives how businesses were not private. How they belonged to the government and/or the public. How serving the public meant they had no right to refuse service.
Yet the past few days, progressives had drowned social media celebrating stories of businesses who "serve the public" denying Nazi and/or white supremacist groups service. One was a restaurant. The big news today was ISP and cloud services denying their services to a website called "Daily Stormer" (apparently some white supremacist site).
So what happened? When a business owner wanted to refuse service to homosexuals based on their religious beliefs (fully protected by the U.S. Constitution), the left completely lost their shit. They insisted that it was "discrimination" and demanded that either the business be forced - at the barrel of a gun - to provide their products or services, or be run out of business.
And yet, when a business does the exact same thing to another group (for reasons not protected by the U.S. Constitution), all we hear from the fascists is "they have the right to refuse service".
This is what happens when views/ideologies are built from irrational emotion instead of logic and reason. There is an absurd contradiction and lack of consistency - which completely obliterates all credibility (hence the reason nobody takes the left seriously on anything).
One can always count on a progressive to act with "class"...To OP, look at it like this progs rotate on views and you rotate on a dildo. Which is better?
You know what does matter though? Progressives inability to be consistent on their views. That's what happens though when one uses irrational emotions to build their ideology.What’s normal and natural to them is mentally ill to you, it really doesn’t matter though.
Well...destroying this nation has been the focus of the left for at least the past 100 years. Why silence just part of the left and not the rest of it?NeoNazis and KKK go beyond politics, they openly want to destroy this nation(.)
Kind of like calling somebodies lifestyle and personal presences about who they are attracted to a mental illness?You know what does matter though? Progressives inability to be consistent on their views. That's what happens though when one uses irrational emotions to build their ideology.What’s normal and natural to them is mentally ill to you, it really doesn’t matter though.
One can always count on a progressive to act with "class"...To OP, look at it like this progs rotate on views and you rotate on a dildo. Which is better?
Come on Debbie...go back to posting about your dildo collection. It generates so much respect for you here on this board.One can always count on a progressive to act with "class"...To OP, look at it like this progs rotate on views and you rotate on a dildo. Which is better?
Sort of like Denny Hassert?
It's not "irrational emotion" to accept science, Slade.Kind of like calling somebodies lifestyle and personal presences about who they are attracted to a mental illness?You know what does matter though? Progressives inability to be consistent on their views. That's what happens though when one uses irrational emotions to build their ideology.What’s normal and natural to them is mentally ill to you, it really doesn’t matter though.
How does science define homosexuality as an illness?It's not "irrational emotion" to accept science, Slade.Kind of like calling somebodies lifestyle and personal presences about who they are attracted to a mental illness?You know what does matter though? Progressives inability to be consistent on their views. That's what happens though when one uses irrational emotions to build their ideology.What’s normal and natural to them is mentally ill to you, it really doesn’t matter though.
People are standing up to groups and individuals that spread hate speech and who are widely condemned by every leader in our country including Trump. How can you compare that to an oppressed minority group like homosexuals?
The profoundly ignorant (and infamously lazy) Michelle Obama has her contradictions highlighted by Mike Hukabee...“Quite frankly, we saw this in this election. As far as I’m concerned, any woman who voted against Hillary Clinton voted against their own voice.”
“You don’t like your voice. You like the thing you’re told to like.” - Michelle Obama
Science indisputably dictates that an X and a Y chromosome means you're a male. Putting on a dress and calling yourself "Chelsea" because you believe you were "born into the wrong body" is the quintessential definition of a mental fucking illness.How does science define homosexuality as an illness?It's not "irrational emotion" to accept science, Slade.Kind of like calling somebodies lifestyle and personal presences about who they are attracted to a mental illness?You know what does matter though? Progressives inability to be consistent on their views. That's what happens though when one uses irrational emotions to build their ideology.What’s normal and natural to them is mentally ill to you, it really doesn’t matter though.
I am consistent with all my views
Everyone believes that.
People are standing up to groups and individuals that spread hate speech and who are widely condemned by every leader in our country including Trump. How can you compare that to an oppressed minority group like homosexuals?For the past 10 years or so we had to hear from progressives how businesses were not private. How they belonged to the government and/or the public. How serving the public meant they had no right to refuse service.
Yet the past few days, progressives had drowned social media celebrating stories of businesses who "serve the public" denying Nazi and/or white supremacist groups service. One was a restaurant. The big news today was ISP and cloud services denying their services to a website called "Daily Stormer" (apparently some white supremacist site).
So what happened? When a business owner wanted to refuse service to homosexuals based on their religious beliefs (fully protected by the U.S. Constitution), the left completely lost their shit. They insisted that it was "discrimination" and demanded that either the business be forced - at the barrel of a gun - to provide their products or services, or be run out of business.
And yet, when a business does the exact same thing to another group (for reasons not protected by the U.S. Constitution), all we hear from the fascists is "they have the right to refuse service".
This is what happens when views/ideologies are built from irrational emotion instead of logic and reason. There is an absurd contradiction and lack of consistency - which completely obliterates all credibility (hence the reason nobody takes the left seriously on anything).
Science indisputably dictates that an X and a Y chromosome means you're a male. Putting on a dress and calling yourself "Chelsea" because you believe you were "born into the wrong body" is the quintessential definition of a mental fucking illness.
Who am I saying don’t have rights?People are standing up to groups and individuals that spread hate speech and who are widely condemned by every leader in our country including Trump. How can you compare that to an oppressed minority group like homosexuals?
Libs go by feelings, not reason and law. It's not about comparing people, it's about understanding that the Bill of Rights covers everyone equally.
Freedom is freedom. It means we all have it, including people you hate, or no one has it.
You cannot say that people you agree with have rights but people you disagree with don't.
