`
I don't believe voter fraud is as big as a problem as the far right claim it is. Every time that issue goes to court, it gets tossed aside for lack of evidence. However, I have no problem with an ID such as a state ID or drivers license.
The lack of evidence is because Blue States won't comply with their voting data.
What evidence do you have that "Blue States won't comply"? The real issue is voter suppression, not only an anti democratic movement by the extreme right, but another clear comment that the 21st century right cannot win on ideas.
Blue States have been fighting it for years.
There is also no real hard evidence of voter suppression either.
Insight: Scant evidence of voter suppression, fraud in states with ID laws | Reuters
LOL No Evidence of Voter Suppression?? Do you live in a cave? Or, are you willfully ignorant like an Ostrich with its head in the sand?
Some suppression is overt, closing polling places based on registration records, limiting days to vote and removing names from the roster and not notifying those removed. Others even more nefarious, such as denying the voter because the signature does not match that on the original registration form, moving the polling place to an area not reachable by public transportation and too far away from the voter to walk.
Well the Democrats have found the answer, just send their agents to the homes of old people and help them fill out the voters cards and bring them back to the Voters Reg office to have them counted. Sound good to the Democrat for that what they did in Texas.
As the Star-Telegram reported further, a statement from Paxton’s office said that the four women face 30 counts of voter fraud. They were allegedly paid by a Democratic operative to target older voters “in a scheme to generate a large number of mail ballots and then harvest those ballots for specific candidates in 2016,” the statement continued.
“Ballots by mail are intended to make it easier for Texas seniors to vote,” Paxton said, according to the statement. “My office is committed to ensuring that paid vote harvesters who fraudulently generate mail ballots, stealing votes from seniors, are held accountable for their despicable actions and for the damage they inflict on the electoral process.”
The state attorney general’s office said vote harvesting schemes work in two phases. First, there is the ‘seeding,’ then the harvesting. Fraudsters send mail-in ballots to “targeted precincts,” then “harvesters attempt either to intercept the ballots outright or to ‘assist’ elderly voters in casting their ballots while ensuring that the votes are cast for the candidates of the harvesters’ choice,” the AG’s office said, according to the Star-Telegram.
Most of the time “voters do not even know their votes have been stolen.”