Profile Of Woman Leading Protests At USSC Justice Homes

[easyt65]

Wooten-Holoway is a member of 'Ruth Sent Us', a leftist pro-abortion extremist group that called for planned, and carried out protests at USSC Justices homes. She also put Justices lives in danger by doxxing them.

Her initial attempt at doxxing the Justices actually put innocent Americans' lives in danger by giving the wrong locations / addresses.

- Proving to be one who refuses to take responsibility for her own actions, Wooten-Holoway blamed the residents for all the people who showed up because THEY failed to correct HER mistake by not telling her their residences were not those of the USSC Justices she was looking for.

Bwuhahahaha



In summary, the NY Times created a profile of Wooten-Holoway describing her in this way and this article states this:

"What to make of all of this?

Wooten-Holway was the victim of a sexual assault and has clearly been traumatized by it. I hope the bastard responsible rots in jail for his crimes.

But Justice Kavanaugh was not that man. The allegations made against Kavanaugh had little to no outside support, not even from the accusers best friend who was supposedly present at the party in question.

More to the point, since she lives in Maryland Wooten-Holway’s right to an abortion WON'T EVEN BE IMPACTED even if the Supreme Court’s decision matches the leaked draft. Abortion will remain legal in Maryland.

Despite this last fact, Wooten-Holloway put the lives of innocent Americans having nothing to do with the USSC or the potential reversal of RVW and the lives of USSC Justices in danger for her own political/ personal benfit, based on half-truths, fiction, and emotion.

Reading the NYT description if her two abortions after presumed/assumed lack of caution - having 2 abortions to escape responsibikity for her own actions, it is not surprised she blamed the innocent families whose lives she put in danger by sending protesters / extremists to the wrong addresses. It sounds like taking personal responsibility is not her thing.

Washington Post profiles woman protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices

hotair.com

 

[Zincwarrior]

Wooten-Holoway is a member of 'Ruth Sent Us', a leftist pro-abortion extremist group that called for planned, and carried out protests at USSC Justices homes. She also put Justices lives in danger by doxxing them.

Her initial attempt at doxxing the Justices actually put innocent Americans' lives in danger by giving the wrong locations / addresses.

- Proving to be one who refuses to take responsibility for her own actions, Wooten-Holoway blamed the residents for all the people who showed up because THEY failed to correct HER mistake by not telling her their residences were not those of the USSC Justices she was looking for.

Bwuhahahaha



In summary, the NY Times created a profile of Wooten-Holoway describing her in this way and this article states this:

"What to make of all of this?

Wooten-Holway was the victim of a sexual assault and has clearly been traumatized by it. I hope the bastard responsible rots in jail for his crimes.

But Justice Kavanaugh was not that man. The allegations made against Kavanaugh had little to no outside support, not even from the accusers best friend who was supposedly present at the party in question.

More to the point, since she lives in Maryland Wooten-Holway’s right to an abortion WON'T EVEN BE IMPACTED even if the Supreme Court’s decision matches the leaked draft. Abortion will remain legal in Maryland.

Despite this last fact, Wooten-Holloway put the lives of innocent Americans having nothing to do with the USSC or the potential reversal of RVW and the lives of USSC Justices in danger for her own political/ personal benfit, based on half-truths, fiction, and emotion.

Reading the NYT description if her two abortions after presumed/assumed lack of caution - having 2 abortions to escape responsibikity for her own actions, it is not surprised she blamed the innocent families whose lives she put in danger by sending protesters / extremists to the wrong addresses. It sounds like taking personal responsibility is not her thing.

Washington Post profiles woman protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices

hotair.com

First amendment

 

[Big Bend Texas]

It is a federal crime to attempt to influence a court decision by means of threats and intimidation.

These "protesters" should all get the same inhumane treatment the Jan 6 "insurrectionists" have gotten.

A complete denial of rights, solitary confinement, no visitors, no bail, in some case no charges even for days or weeks and then only BS fabricated charges like trespassing on federal property when they were let in by security.

Of course, with democrats in charge it's highly doubtful they will even be asked kindly to leave by police.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

First amendment

There's no First Amendment Right to attempt to affect the outcome of deliberations by a Federal judge/justice through threats, force, intimidation harassment or coercion.

 

[easyt65]

First amendment

Expound, please.

Are you saying doxxing Americans, putting their lives in danger - especially when you doxx the wrong people - is covered by the 1st Amendment?

 

[kyzr]

Intimidating judges is a felony. They should be arrested.

 

[B. Kidd]

Wooten-Holoway is a member of 'Ruth Sent Us', a leftist pro-abortion extremist group that called for planned, and carried out protests at USSC Justices homes. She also put Justices lives in danger by doxxing them.

Her initial attempt at doxxing the Justices actually put innocent Americans' lives in danger by giving the wrong locations / addresses.

- Proving to be one who refuses to take responsibility for her own actions, Wooten-Holoway blamed the residents for all the people who showed up because THEY failed to correct HER mistake by not telling her their residences were not those of the USSC Justices she was looking for.

Bwuhahahaha



In summary, the NY Times created a profile of Wooten-Holoway describing her in this way and this article states this:

"What to make of all of this?

Wooten-Holway was the victim of a sexual assault and has clearly been traumatized by it. I hope the bastard responsible rots in jail for his crimes.

But Justice Kavanaugh was not that man. The allegations made against Kavanaugh had little to no outside support, not even from the accusers best friend who was supposedly present at the party in question.

More to the point, since she lives in Maryland Wooten-Holway’s right to an abortion WON'T EVEN BE IMPACTED even if the Supreme Court’s decision matches the leaked draft. Abortion will remain legal in Maryland.

Despite this last fact, Wooten-Holloway put the lives of innocent Americans having nothing to do with the USSC or the potential reversal of RVW and the lives of USSC Justices in danger for her own political/ personal benfit, based on half-truths, fiction, and emotion.

Reading the NYT description if her two abortions after presumed/assumed lack of caution - having 2 abortions to escape responsibikity for her own actions, it is not surprised she blamed the innocent families whose lives she put in danger by sending protesters / extremists to the wrong addresses. It sounds like taking personal responsibility is not her thing.

Washington Post profiles woman protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices

hotair.com

It looks like she can't find her tampon with 2 hands.

 

[OKTexas]

It is a federal crime to attempt to influence a court decision by means of threats and intimidation.

These "protesters" should all get the same inhumane treatment the Jan 6 "insurrectionists" have gotten.

A complete denial of rights, solitary confinement, no visitors, no bail, in some case no charges even for days or weeks and then only BS fabricated charges like trespassing on federal property when they were let in by security.

Of course, with democrats in charge it's highly doubtful they will even be asked kindly to leave by police.

Don't forget the conspiracy charges to go along with intimidation charges.

.

 

[Dekster]

Well John Roberts is no Nancy Pelosi. He had them putting a giant security fence around his building as soon as this leaked

 

[Zincwarrior]

It is a federal crime to attempt to influence a court decision by means of threats and intimidation.

These "protesters" should all get the same inhumane treatment the Jan 6 "insurrectionists" have gotten.

A complete denial of rights, solitary confinement, no visitors, no bail, in some case no charges even for days or weeks and then only BS fabricated charges like trespassing on federal property when they were let in by security.

Of course, with democrats in charge it's highly doubtful they will even be asked kindly to leave by police.

First Amendment says hello and trump's your argument.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

First Amendment says hello and trump's your argument.

No, it doesn't. There is no protected right to interfere with the processes of any court.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Expound, please.

Are you saying doxxing Americans, putting their lives in danger - especially when you doxx the wrong people - is covered by the 1st Amendment?

Yes.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No, it doesn't. There is no protected right to interfere with the processes of any court.

They aren't.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Well John Roberts is no Nancy Pelosi. He had them putting a giant security fence around his building as soon as this leaked

Roberts doesn't have the authority, that authority belongs to the Capitol Police run by Nancy Pelosi.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well John Roberts is no Nancy Pelosi. He had them putting a giant security fence around his building as soon as this leaked

Will Roberts make the police shoot unarmed protester too??

 

[Devils_Advocate]

First amendment

Not if the address is wrong and the First Amendment does have limitations and harassment is not protected by the first amendment…

 

[Dekster]

Will Roberts make the police shoot unarmed protester too??

IDK since he has Obama's lesbian justices to beat them down as a fail-safe.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

They aren't.

Of course they are, the intent is to force a justice or justices to change their votes on the Roe decision through harassment, threats, and intimidation.

They would be free to protest a decision after it is rendered but it is a crime to in any way coerce Judges, justices, or jurors in the case of an ongoing proceeding.

 

[Rambunctious]

Yes.

Read your constitution.... study the law regarding intimidation of justices.... Its a federal offense and can land you in prison... Your right to free speech stops when you intimidate and threaten others....

 

[JusticeHammer]

First Amendment says hello and trump's your argument.

Better than anything stupid libs have.