As ought to be evident to all, FACTS appear to be much less important to electoral outcomes than the PERCEPTION of the facts.
Now I do not doubt that Romney did nothing wrong when it comes to having paid his taxes.
So why, given these charges, is Romeny refusing to show the American people how much he paid over the last decade?
I think we all understand why he refuses.
Because what we would discover is that Romeny paid a very small percentage of his income. Like a percentage much much lower than the average working person in the USA.
And THAT would be percieved as being unfair, even if Romeny's tax returns were perfectly legal.
After all, Romney's complaint is that the very welathy pay way too high a percentage in taxes.
But it is very likely that if we saw what HE PAID, we would discover that he paid a very low percentage of his income.
In other words the basic thrust of his complaint about taxes would prove to be (at least in HIS case) total bullshit.
THAT is why Romney hesitates to END this story.
Because it would end when Romeny was proven to be just another whining rich boy who enjoys enormous tax breaks that most people cannot enjoy.
That is where I am. I have no doubt that Romney didn't do anything illegal.
From: Ann Romney on tax returns:
Ann Romney on tax returns:
If the Romney's vast assets are in a "blind trust" and Mrs Romney doesn't know what or where it is invested, how could she say they're not hiding anything? If she doesn't know where the money is, how do we know what it is funding?
It might be in foreign banks, loaning money to fund foreign business - competing with our own. Or, it might be in rare paintings, or automobiles or any number of instruments outside our borders funding any manner of things not in our nations best interest.
And why were these assets placed in a blind trust for over a decade? One would presume someone who tauts their business acuity would be better able to invest their assets than those who operate said blind trust.
I'm sure none of the investments were illegal, but extralegal or furtive is a possibility. Otherwise why hide the great wealth he is so proud to have built?