President Trump signs EO to crack down on mail-in ballots

[forkup]

Democrats claim insufficient proof of fraud was uncovered in the two or three weeks following the election, especially with democrats blocking investigations into fraud, so that supposedly stupidly proves no fraud occurred.

Democrates weren't in charge of the DOJ so how did they do this pray tell?

 

[markef]

Every court gave reasonable time. You can prove nothing to counter it.

It took a month to conduct a timely forensics examination of Dominion voting machines in just one county. How long do you think it would take to cross reference voting registries, vote data and INS records to find out just how many registered illegals voted in 2020?

 

[markef]

Based on the plaintiffs' lack of evidence, the Court's time was wasted on frivolous lawsuits.

No credible evidence of voter fraud was offered, so the Cour concluded the evidence of voter fraud was not credible.

What exactly did the court rule? 'That since plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence we conclude the evidence presented and any other evidence not yet presented must be false?'

 

[markef]

There was insufficient evidence provided in sixty cases.

That is a heck of well-constructed conspiracy against Trump.

How many of the 60 cases were rejected by courts without even examining the evidence? Most of them in fact.

 

[markef]

And the Judge did not rule for and on Trump's behalf. This is about voter fraud not about leftist attorneys.

There was no fraud.

And yet neither marc Elias nor any of the others rejecting the evidence even tried to prove the evidence was wrong.

 

[markef]

The would-be Safe Act is voter suppression.

Democrats say that because they know a voter ID requirement would do serious damage to their traditional practice of stealing elections through voter fraud.

 

[markef]

"Possibly" with no evidence.

There is not a democrat in the country who can disprove the evidence but nearly every democrat crook in the nation will falsely claim the court disproved the evidence. Rejecting evidence does not discredit or refute evidence.

 

[markef]

No fraud has occurred if you can't prove the evidence that it did.

markef, that's how it works.

Democrats have been very successful in convincing dummies that if the evidence of fraud is limited, suppressed, or covered then that can be taken as irrefutable proof that hard to detect voter fraud never occurred.

 

[forkup]

What exactly did the court rule? 'That since plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence we conclude the evidence presented and any other evidence not yet presented must be false?'

No they ruled that the evidence was insufficient to assert it as true. There's a difference. The burden of proof is on the people making the claim. It's not on the court to disprove it.

And here's what the courts ruled. Just follow the post. It'll bring you to a previous reply and the court cases were available, and the reporting of direct quotes were not.

I gave you 2 cases, where the judge said the evidence was weak as for the rest.
Sure, how many do you want?

 

[markef]

No, there is not. None. If there were, you would show us.

Fact check: Claim of voting noncitizens in 2020 election is unverified

Fact check: Claim that voting noncitizens affected 2020 election outcome is unverified

Chelsey Cox
USA TODAY
Nov. 19, 2020Updated Nov. 20, 2020, 12:20 p.m. ET

The claim: Joe Biden received extra votes in battleground states from noncitizens

What are the biggest updates at the moment?

What's a major issue I should understand better?

What are the biggest updates at the moment?

What's expected to change soon in the news?

Since Election Day, President Donald Trump’s campaign has launched a series of lawsuits calling into question election results in some key battleground states, and alleging fraudulent voting practices that affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, USA TODAY has reported.

Experts say the lawsuits will likely fail, but a public policy research firm found merit in the Trump campaign’s complaints.

An estimated 234,570 extra votes were cast by noncitizens in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania, enough to deliver a win for President-elect Joe Biden, according to a report from Just Facts Daily. The website is an extension of conservative-leaning research institute, Just Facts.

 

[markef]

... because all facts reveal there is no systemic voting fraud, silly.

How do you know undetected voting fraud is not a big problem?

 

[markef]

That's not how it works.

What measures are democrats proposing to hinder voter fraud? Americans support by a massive majority election security measures that give them confidence crooks are not casting illegitimate votes.

 

[markef]

More allegations without any proof. Opinions are not proof in court.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2010/07/20/al-franken-may-have-won-his-senate-seat-through-voter-fraud

Al Franken May Have Won His Senate Seat Through Voter Fraud​

It's time for real voter registration reform.

By Peter Roff
|
July 20, 2010, at 4:15 p.m.
SaveAdd us onComment
More



It looks increasingly likely that at least one member of the United States Senate may owe his seat in the world’s greatest deliberative body not to his charisma or the persuasiveness of his message but to voter fraud.

 

[markef]

You have never shared any evidence except that you don't get that belief and opinions are not evidence and that a court administers and adjudicates the law and does not investigate, which is for the LEO agencies.

Denying evidence does not disprove evidence.

 

[markef]

Unsupport allegation.

Forensic Report of Dominion Voting machines alleges fraud; intentionally high error rate; deletion of data | Sharyl Attkisson


Report released by Michigan court today

Dominion software said to have an incredibly high 68% error rate, “by design”

2020 election data illegally deleted on Nov. 4, according to the Plaintiff’s forensic report

Plaintiff’s attorney claims the forensics exam proves fraud, which Dominion and Antrim County, Michigan officials deny

 

[markef]

I also can't prove theirs a giant block of cheese floating in orbit around Uranus.

How logic works though is absent verifiable facts a premise should be rejected.

In this case countless lawsuits where filed none bore fruit. Countless audits, investigations and now investigations of the investigations were conducted. What we still haven't found is any proof besides fever dreams that have been rejected before.

So it's not that the accusations have not been investigated. It's that the investigations have turned up nothing.

It is not logical to claim voting fraud is rare when there is so much evidence of exposed fraud coupled with the large number of democrats convicted of committing voter fraud sometimes for years as if everyone accepting fraud and committing fraud.

 

[markef]

The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map

The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map is an interactive tool providing a sampling of proven instances of election fraud across the U.S. From @HeritageDataviz

electionfraud.heritage.org

This is a database by the heritage foundation, the people who gave us project 2025, so hardly a left wing organization. It goes back to 1982 and encompasses elections for city aldearman al the way up to every presidential election. For a grand total of 1620. This out of billions of votes cast. So that's not an "amazing" number. In fact it's a percentage far smaller than 0.001 percent.

What does detected voter fraud prove about undetected voter fraud? That undetected voter fraud is rare? I don't think so. The fact that so many democrats have gotten caught committing fraud without fear indicates there is a wide perception among democrats that voter fraud is acceptable and getting caught is rare.

 

[markef]

Do you trust the Heritage foundation?

As much as organizations like the Heritage Foundation have proven trustworthy.

 

[markef]

The DOJ can and did. And found nothing of any scale.

I do not believe the DOJ proved undetected voting fraud is rare.

 

[markef]

Democrates weren't in charge of the DOJ so how did they do this pray tell?

Comey and friends illegally and seditiously tried to destroy Trump so we must accept the fact that even officials in republican administrations can be corrupt.