- Aug 12, 2009
- 39,508
- 18,837
- 1,590
How so?My point is actual KKK racists would support fully the Manhattan DA's policies in minority areas because it would achieve their hopes and dreams for said minority areas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How so?My point is actual KKK racists would support fully the Manhattan DA's policies in minority areas because it would achieve their hopes and dreams for said minority areas.
How so?
Rudy was a strong supporter of gun control. Don’t try to change history.Rudy cleaned up NY with broken windows policing, constant statistical analysis of crime rates, and holding the County DA's accountable via public pressure.
NYC's gun control laws haven't changed in decades.
It increased under rump and the trend continues.Crime is up everywhere turdstain, including rightwing precincts.
We send the illegal guns to Mexico.Yeah, illegal guns, coming across the southern border along with the drugs. Shut down the border, and then there would be less illegal guns and less drugs. I guess that makes too much sense.
NYC is a shithole 3rd world city now, thanks to Socialist policies of the Mayor and Governor."NYC is the greatest city in the world...with apologies to Wilmington, Delaware!" - Rep Hakeem Jeffries to President Biden
Crime dropped like a rock when Clinton passed gun control, just saying…. Most concealed carry than ever and homicides climbing…
---------------------------------------------------------------------Only if they were negligent in storage. If the guns were legally stored and still stolen how is the original owner liable?
Rudy was a strong supporter of gun control. Don’t try to change history.
Rudy Giuliani Has the Kind of Gun Control Record That Gets Presidential Appointees Savaged By the NRA
Among the many bizarre dilemmas a Donald Trump presidency poses for Senate Republicans, this may be one of the weirder ones: A conservative majority that’s invoked Second Amendment rights and National Rifle Association grades to obstruct Democratic judicial and executive nominations may soon...www.thetrace.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Negligence is established --by definition -- once the gun leaves the control of the owner-of-record and harm ensues.
That is the nature of "strict liability".
Guns ain't cars.
They are different.
Trust me.
Under a "strict liability" rubric ---- if you are the owner-of-record (O.O.R.).... ANY harm caused by that high-lethality tool falls partly---or even wholly ---on the responsible O.O.R.
You bring it into society you....ipso facto.....assume the liability for the harm it causes.
Pretty simple. IMHO
---------------------------------------------------------------Please show me where a person was actually found liable for this, as long as they followed storage rules, and reported the theft in a reasonable legally defined time.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Well, that's regrettable.
I thought I was being clear that my avatar would support such a change in our laws. NOT that those laws exist today. (reference post #19).
So, with that said: I would repeat.....I will support the advancement of the ethic and the laws that would enable a "strict liability" rubric to become a reality.
Guns ain't cars. Their purpose, design, and use are different. Their very features of being a high-lethality tool, highly portable, readily concealed, ease-of-use, make them unique among tools. Unique among weapons. Accordingly, the laws that apply to them must be of a different nature than the laws for auto, scissors, and baseball bats.