Prediction: Obama will not run in Arizona over birth certificate

I'll come right out and say it...

Arizona does not have the balls to keep Obama off the ballot

What about the 9 other states that are now in the process of enacting Birther statutes? That includes New Hampshire. If New Hampshire has the cahones to demand proof of citizenship and Obama can't get on the ballot there, he really is toast.

10 states now developing eligibility proof-demands

They are just sucking up to right wing nut cases

When it comes time to actually review documentation, they will accept the findings of the State of Hawaii

They will not have the balls to open up this can of worms

It has happen before. Lincoln was not on any ballots in the south.
 
What about the 9 other states that are now in the process of enacting Birther statutes? That includes New Hampshire. If New Hampshire has the cahones to demand proof of citizenship and Obama can't get on the ballot there, he really is toast.
10 states now developing eligibility proof-demands
They are just sucking up to right wing nut cases
When it comes time to actually review documentation, they will accept the findings of the State of Hawaii
They will not have the balls to open up this can of worms

It has happen before. Lincoln was not on any ballots in the south.

Oh really...

And how did that turn out?
 
They are just sucking up to right wing nut cases
When it comes time to actually review documentation, they will accept the findings of the State of Hawaii
They will not have the balls to open up this can of worms

It has happen before. Lincoln was not on any ballots in the south.

Oh really...

And how did that turn out?

I'm just saying it has happen before, and there is your legal precedence that Arizona has grounds to do this.
 
It has happen before. Lincoln was not on any ballots in the south.

Oh really...

And how did that turn out?

I'm just saying it has happen before, and there is your legal precedence that Arizona has grounds to do this.


It would only be a "legal precident" if State law barred Lincoln from appearing on the ballots or if the Republican Party in those states choose to not place him on the ballot. One is an action of the State government, the other is the action of a private organization.

Do you have any evidence that Lincoln was barred by State law even though he met the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President?


Just because he wasn't on the ballot, does not prove he was barred from being on the ballot.



>>>>
 
Last edited:
Do you have any evidence that Lincoln was barred by State law even though he met the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President?
Huh? I'm no birther, but dude, the point of the State law is proving he does meet "the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President." You're stating that as assumption, it's referred to as "begging the question."

I have no sympathy for anyone who's trying to get him ousted as President, but I have no issue with States demanding candidates meet Constitutional requirements to be President to be on their ballot for President. But Obama met whatever rules were in place when he ran the first time so unless the birthers can prove he wasn't born in the US they need to shut up about that and move on. I'm not seeing any advantage to go from clueless Obama to the moron Biden anyway. Freedom is hosed either way.
 
Oh really...

And how did that turn out?

I'm just saying it has happen before, and there is your legal precedence that Arizona has grounds to do this.


It would only be a "legal precident" if State law barred Lincoln from appearing on the ballots or if the Republican Party in those states choose to not place him on the ballot. One is an action of the State government, the other is the action of a private organization.

Do you have any evidence that Lincoln was barred by State law even though he met the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President?


Just because he wasn't on the ballot, does not prove he was barred from being on the ballot.



>>>>

Exactly which candidate is going to voluntary stay off a national ballot without the states forcing the issue?

Who are the people who place political candidates for a national election on a ballot?
 
I'm just saying it has happen before, and there is your legal precedence that Arizona has grounds to do this.


It would only be a "legal precident" if State law barred Lincoln from appearing on the ballots or if the Republican Party in those states choose to not place him on the ballot. One is an action of the State government, the other is the action of a private organization.

Do you have any evidence that Lincoln was barred by State law even though he met the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President?


Just because he wasn't on the ballot, does not prove he was barred from being on the ballot.



>>>>

Exactly which candidate is going to voluntary stay off a national ballot without the states forcing the issue?

Who are the people who place political candidates for a national election on a ballot?

It is the individual states who, referring to constitutional law, decide whether a prospective candidate meets the minimum qualifications to be placed on the state's presidential ballot. Next year, the only thing New Hampshire, Arizonam, Texas, and 7 other states are going to ask Obama is "Kenya show us a certified birth certificate." When the answer is no, ba bye second term.
 
During the election of 1860 the Republican party was in its infancy. It was brand new and unestablished in some states, especially in the south. The party was only able to so swiftly gain traction in the north thanks largely to Dred Scott v Sandford, but it was not then a major political party as it is now. The campaign featured about four different candidates for President, and the Republican party chose to forgo running in the south, apparently seeing little benefit to be gained from the effort. Because northern Congressional caucuses were dominated by the Republican party, Lincoln did not need to win a majority vote in the electoral college. The only thing he really needed to do was be able to avoid any other candidate from gaining a full majority. If the matter had gone to the House, Lincoln could be expected to win that decision by being easily able to carry the same 18 out of 33 states that he ended up carrying in the electoral college. So it was a simple matter of a new party that scarcely existed in certain areas choosing to not make an attempt to get onto the ballot. That does not make a legal precedent for a state refusing a place on the ballot for an incumbent President based on allegedly faulty citizenship.
 
It is the individual states who, referring to constitutional law, decide whether a prospective candidate meets the minimum qualifications to be placed on the state's presidential ballot. Next year, the only thing New Hampshire, Arizonam, Texas, and 7 other states are going to ask Obama is "Kenya show us a certified birth certificate." When the answer is no, ba bye second term.

Why do people insist on ignoring the fact that Obama has ALREADY PRESENTED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
 
It is the individual states who, referring to constitutional law, decide whether a prospective candidate meets the minimum qualifications to be placed on the state's presidential ballot. Next year, the only thing New Hampshire, Arizonam, Texas, and 7 other states are going to ask Obama is "Kenya show us a certified birth certificate." When the answer is no, ba bye second term.

Why do people insist on ignoring the fact that Obama has ALREADY PRESENTED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

SHHhhhhhh....

Birthers know more than the State of Hawaii
 
During the election of 1860 the Republican party was in its infancy. It was brand new and unestablished in some states, especially in the south. The party was only able to so swiftly gain traction in the north thanks largely to Dred Scott v Sandford, but it was not then a major political party as it is now. The campaign featured about four different candidates for President, and the Republican party chose to forgo running in the south, apparently seeing little benefit to be gained from the effort. Because northern Congressional caucuses were dominated by the Republican party, Lincoln did not need to win a majority vote in the electoral college. The only thing he really needed to do was be able to avoid any other candidate from gaining a full majority. If the matter had gone to the House, Lincoln could be expected to win that decision by being easily able to carry the same 18 out of 33 states that he ended up carrying in the electoral college. So it was a simple matter of a new party that scarcely existed in certain areas choosing to not make an attempt to get onto the ballot. That does not make a legal precedent for a state refusing a place on the ballot for an incumbent President based on allegedly faulty citizenship.

Which has absolutly nothing to do with the electorial process.
 
It is the individual states who, referring to constitutional law, decide whether a prospective candidate meets the minimum qualifications to be placed on the state's presidential ballot. Next year, the only thing New Hampshire, Arizonam, Texas, and 7 other states are going to ask Obama is "Kenya show us a certified birth certificate." When the answer is no, ba bye second term.

Why do people insist on ignoring the fact that Obama has ALREADY PRESENTED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

When did obama show a birth certificate? The two that has been shown have not proven anything. Since obama has not identified who his doctor was and conflicting reports on the location of birth hospital, there is room to doubt.
 
It is the individual states who, referring to constitutional law, decide whether a prospective candidate meets the minimum qualifications to be placed on the state's presidential ballot. Next year, the only thing New Hampshire, Arizonam, Texas, and 7 other states are going to ask Obama is "Kenya show us a certified birth certificate." When the answer is no, ba bye second term.

Why do people insist on ignoring the fact that Obama has ALREADY PRESENTED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

SHHhhhhhh....

Birthers know more than the State of Hawaii

OH yell the democratic controlled state of Hawaii. What we do know is that democrats lie.

Like I have mentioned in the past I have a grand son that was born in Hawaii his birth certificate doe not look anything like the two that is supposed to be obamas birth certificate.
 
It is the individual states who, referring to constitutional law, decide whether a prospective candidate meets the minimum qualifications to be placed on the state's presidential ballot. Next year, the only thing New Hampshire, Arizonam, Texas, and 7 other states are going to ask Obama is "Kenya show us a certified birth certificate." When the answer is no, ba bye second term.

Why do people insist on ignoring the fact that Obama has ALREADY PRESENTED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

When did obama show a birth certificate? The two that has been shown have not proven anything. Since obama has not identified who his doctor was and conflicting reports on the location of birth hospital, there is room to doubt.

Where in the Constitution does it state that a candidate for president must identify his doctor or the Hospital he was born in?

Obama has presented his Birth Certificate, the State of Hawaii has certified it. He has used his Birth Certificate to attend schools, get a drivers liscence and a passport from the State Department

It is time for birthers to show some evidence he was born elsewhere before we start more of this nonsense.

How about:

Travel documents showing his mother was out of the country?
Documents showing she brought an infant back into the US
Hospital records from another country indicating she was admitted

Come on birthers....the evidence must be out there. Isn't it time you put up or shut up?
 
Last edited:
Why do people insist on ignoring the fact that Obama has ALREADY PRESENTED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

SHHhhhhhh....

Birthers know more than the State of Hawaii

OH yell the democratic controlled state of Hawaii. What we do know is that democrats lie.

Like I have mentioned in the past I have a grand son that was born in Hawaii his birth certificate doe not look anything like the two that is supposed to be obamas birth certificate.

The REPUBLICAN Governor of Hawaii certified his birth in that state.

Post your grandsons birth certificate so that we know you are not lying
 
SHHhhhhhh....

Birthers know more than the State of Hawaii

OH yell the democratic controlled state of Hawaii. What we do know is that democrats lie.

Like I have mentioned in the past I have a grand son that was born in Hawaii his birth certificate doe not look anything like the two that is supposed to be obamas birth certificate.

The REPUBLICAN Governor of Hawaii certified his birth in that state.

Post your grandsons birth certificate so that we know you are not lying

The Conservative movement wants to create a Corporatist state. That involves invalidating our present government.
 
15th post
This is all besides the point anyway. Was his mother not a citizen? That makes him a citizen at birth.
 
Why do people insist on ignoring the fact that Obama has ALREADY PRESENTED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

When did obama show a birth certificate? The two that has been shown have not proven anything. Since obama has not identified who his doctor was and conflicting reports on the location of birth hospital, there is room to doubt.

Where in the Constitution does it state that a candidate for president must identify his doctor or the Hospital he was born in?

Obama has presented his Birth Certificate, the State of Hawaii has certified it. He has used his Birth Certificate to attend schools, get a drivers liscence and a passport from the State Department

It is time for birthers to show some evidence he was born elsewhere before we start more of this nonsense.

How about:

Travel documents showing his mother was out of the country?
Documents showing she brought an infant back into the US
Hospital records from another country indicating she was admitted

Come on birthers....the evidence must be out there. Isn't it time you put up or shut up?

Wouldnt it be simpler for Obama to just show his long form birth certificate? Im just saying.

As far as evidence, there are currently only 3 people on the planet who claim they were present for Obama's birth, his grandmother and two half siblings, and they all say he was born in Kenya. :eek:
 
This is all besides the point anyway. Was his mother not a citizen? That makes him a citizen at birth.

He may be a citizen but he's still not qualified to run for President if he was born in Kenya. Under the law, you must be a natural born citizen to qualify to be president. To be born outside the country and still be considered natural born, your mother must have been at least 23 years old at the time of birth, and Obama's mother was only 18 when he was born.
 
When did obama show a birth certificate? The two that has been shown have not proven anything. Since obama has not identified who his doctor was and conflicting reports on the location of birth hospital, there is room to doubt.

Where in the Constitution does it state that a candidate for president must identify his doctor or the Hospital he was born in?

Obama has presented his Birth Certificate, the State of Hawaii has certified it. He has used his Birth Certificate to attend schools, get a drivers liscence and a passport from the State Department

It is time for birthers to show some evidence he was born elsewhere before we start more of this nonsense.

How about:

Travel documents showing his mother was out of the country?
Documents showing she brought an infant back into the US
Hospital records from another country indicating she was admitted

Come on birthers....the evidence must be out there. Isn't it time you put up or shut up?

Wouldnt it be simpler for Obama to just show his long form birth certificate? Im just saying.

As far as evidence, there are currently only 3 people on the planet who claim they were present for Obama's birth, his grandmother and two half siblings, and they all say he was born in Kenya. :eek:

I guess if you keep telling a lie someone may believe it

Carry on....at least the other birthers will believe you. But then again, they will beliee anything
 
Back
Top Bottom