The intent of the 2nd Amendment would be arms that any light infantry ought to have. Today, that would be semi-automatic weapons with high capacity magazines.Your right is to bear arms.
Your privilege is to bear really fancy hardware.
Hell, even The Constitutional Right of keeping a 9 in the home for 'just in case' requires the privilege of enough disposable income to afford both the hardware and the ammo.
Carried far enough, the right to bear arms includes an argument for government vouchers redeemable at any federally licensed gun dealer for a serviceable weapon and basic instructions on how to use it for the less fortunate.
The right to bear arms does not guarantee the right to own an aircraft carrier, no matter how well you did in the Dot-Com Era.
Modern politics is deciding what is, and what is not, on the various lists.
How do you know that?
Do you have a link to the source of your interpretation of The Second, or is it just your opinion of the Author's intent?
How do you know the intent did not mean basic self defense?
The AR-15 has its uses, but concealed-carry for self defense is NOT among them.