Post Election Scenarios

[candycorn]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

What’s being considered is a replay of the 2000 presidential election, where the courts – ultimately the Supreme Court – decided the election.

Lawsuits can be filed on behalf of Trump in a given state challenging the election results, enjoining that state from certifying those results, delaying either candidate from claiming that state’s EC votes.

Any chaos will occur in a state Biden flipped – like PA; there’s no point in causing trouble in a red state Trump won.

The problem is that some states’ laws prevent mail-in ballots from being counted before election day; in some states the counting can’t start until after the polls close. As a result, we’ll likely see delays in the press projecting winners.

But Trump would need actual evidence of voting irregularities for a challenge to be valid.

 

[2aguy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

The ones actively trying to wreck the election system are democrats with the mail in ballots. The democrats know biden is a weak candidate and Trump is an incumbent....they pushed mail in voting so they can count and count and count the fake ballots sent in by democrat party activists.....and failing winning the election, they can then attack Trump again....

Are you this blind intentionally or are you just really stupid?

 

[2aguy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

I hope it's war, because there are way more non-commies with guns and we will fucking destroy the goddamn cancer polluting our nation. You should leave.

 

[KissMy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

I hope it's war, because there are way more non-commies with guns and we will fucking destroy the goddamn cancer polluting our nation. You should leave.

Only you losers want war, because you have nothing else to lose.

 

[KissMy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier!

 

[2aguy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier

No, they didn't you doofus.........how do you live with the lies you and your asshat buddies keep pushing?

 

[KissMy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier!

No, they didn't you doofus.........how do you live with the lies you and your asshat buddies keep pushing?

In October 2015, before the official start of the 2016 Republican primary campaign, the founders of Fusion GPS were seeking political work and wrote an email to "a big conservative donor they knew who disliked Trump, [and] they were hired". He arranged for them to use The Washington Free Beacon, an American conservative political journalism website, for their general opposition research on several Republican presidential candidates, including Trump. It is primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer. The Free Beacon and Singer were "part of the conservative never-Trump movement".

 

[Claudette]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier!

Nah. Hitlery and the DNC paid for it. Common knowledge. You should look it up.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“…Trump refused, instead suggesting that the U.S. Supreme Court (buttressed by his nominee Amy Coney Barrett) resolve the election…” ibid

This doesn’t make any sense, which is normal for Trump.

The 2000 election was decided by the Court because only one state’s results were in question, Florida. The Court awarded the state to Bush, giving him 271 ECVs and the presidency.

If the 2020 election isn’t as close as it was in 2000, then there’s no reason for the courts to get involved, regardless how long it takes to count the votes.

 

[KissMy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier!

Nah. Hitlery and the DNC paid for it. Common knowledge. You should look it up.

In October 2015, before the official start of the 2016 Republican primary campaign, the founders of Fusion GPS were seeking political work and wrote an email to "a big conservative donor they knew who disliked Trump, [and] they were hired". He arranged for them to use The Washington Free Beacon, an American conservative political journalism website, for their general opposition research on several Republican presidential candidates, including Trump. It is primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer. The Free Beacon and Singer were "part of the conservative never-Trump movement".

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

I hope it's war, because there are way more non-commies with guns and we will fucking destroy the goddamn cancer polluting our nation. You should leave.

Clearly being a Trump supporter is a form of mental illness.

Trump supporters are as dangerous as they are reprehensible.

 

[Claudette]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier!

Nah. Hitlery and the DNC paid for it. Common knowledge. You should look it up.

In October 2015, before the official start of the 2016 Republican primary campaign, the founders of Fusion GPS were seeking political work and wrote an email to "a big conservative donor they knew who disliked Trump, [and] they were hired". He arranged for them to use The Washington Free Beacon, an American conservative political journalism website, for their general opposition research on several Republican presidential candidates, including Trump. It is primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer. The Free Beacon and Singer were "part of the conservative never-Trump movement".

Hitlery and the DNC paid for that dossier through Fusion.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

I hope it's war, because there are way more non-commies with guns and we will fucking destroy the goddamn cancer polluting our nation. You should leave.

Only you losers want war, because you have nothing else to lose.

We will have nothing to lose if you motherfuckers get your revolution. Consider it preemptive.

 

[KissMy]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier!

Nah. Hitlery and the DNC paid for it. Common knowledge. You should look it up.

In October 2015, before the official start of the 2016 Republican primary campaign, the founders of Fusion GPS were seeking political work and wrote an email to "a big conservative donor they knew who disliked Trump, [and] they were hired". He arranged for them to use The Washington Free Beacon, an American conservative political journalism website, for their general opposition research on several Republican presidential candidates, including Trump. It is primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer. The Free Beacon and Singer were "part of the conservative never-Trump movement".

Hitlery and the DNC paid for that dossier through Fusion.

Republican donor Paul Singer paid for that dossier. After the Republican primary Fusion GPS shopped & sold it to the DNC. None of the money came from Hillary!

 

[Daryl Hunt]

“…Trump refused, instead suggesting that the U.S. Supreme Court (buttressed by his nominee Amy Coney Barrett) resolve the election…” ibid

This doesn’t make any sense, which is normal for Trump.

The 2000 election was decided by the Court because only one state’s results were in question, Florida. The Court awarded the state to Bush, giving him 271 ECVs and the presidency.

If the 2020 election isn’t as close as it was in 2000, then there’s no reason for the courts to get involved, regardless how long it takes to count the votes.

Wrong, the court did NOT award the State to Bush. All they did was put a cutoff date to the recount. Nothing else. Florida awarded the win to Bush.

 

[kyzr]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

What’s being considered is a replay of the 2000 presidential election, where the courts – ultimately the Supreme Court – decided the election.

Lawsuits can be filed on behalf of Trump in a given state challenging the election results, enjoining that state from certifying those results, delaying either candidate from claiming that state’s EC votes.

Any chaos will occur in a state Biden flipped – like PA; there’s no point in causing trouble in a red state Trump won.

The problem is that some states’ laws prevent mail-in ballots from being counted before election day; in some states the counting can’t start until after the polls close. As a result, we’ll likely see delays in the press projecting winners.

But Trump would need actual evidence of voting irregularities for a challenge to be valid.

Ballots were found in a ditch in WI, memory sticks were stolen in Philadelphia, so PA & WI already have grounds for legal challenges.

Were Trays of Mail, Including Mail-In Ballots, Found in a Ditch?

The U.S. Postal Service has been under fire for several problems concerning mail-in ballots in 2020.

www.snopes.com

Memory sticks used to program Phillyâs voting machines were stolen from elections warehouse

The discovery set off a scramble to ensure voting machines had not been compromised and to contain the fallout. City officials said the theft would not disrupt the election.

www.inquirer.com

 

[Billiejeens]

Hello there.

I heard a few stories on the Internet about what some conspiracy theorists are believing may happen in the days after the election. While I don't put much stock into these theories, one does make some modicum of sense. Trump says that there will be chaos after election day in counting the larger than normal number of mailed in ballots. What better way to drive the point home than a red state staging such chaos to help cast doubt on the election? Again, to what end? Each state will sign off on the results, each state will select it's electors, the electors will vote, the votes will be opened and a winner will be decided.

As the theory goes, the President--if he knows he won't win--will do whatever he can to make the victory of Biden as questionable as possible. That sounds like Trump.

This along with the all-but-certain court challenges the President will field if he loses.

Trump Closes Debate by Threatening Election Night Chaos

Rather than forswearing an early victory claim, Trump said the Supreme Court should weigh in on his incoherent, fact-free attacks on voting by mail.

nymag.com

We now know that the Russia hoax was started by hilary, implemented by obama........we have the documents and we have the testimony....you guys can lie all you want but the truth is the truth.

We know Republicans paid for the Steele dossier!

Factually false -
(that a new one, though)

 

[kyzr]

“…Trump refused, instead suggesting that the U.S. Supreme Court (buttressed by his nominee Amy Coney Barrett) resolve the election…” ibid

This doesn’t make any sense, which is normal for Trump.

The 2000 election was decided by the Court because only one state’s results were in question, Florida. The Court awarded the state to Bush, giving him 271 ECVs and the presidency.

If the 2020 election isn’t as close as it was in 2000, then there’s no reason for the courts to get involved, regardless how long it takes to count the votes.

Wrong, the court did NOT award the State to Bush. All they did was put a cutoff date to the recount. Nothing else. Florida awarded the win to Bush.

Exactly, the States all have to certify their EC vote counts by a specific date or their EC votes don't count.
The date varies, but generally between 11/30 and 12/11, or the states' EC votes don't count.