Portland Rapid Response Team Resigns Ahead of Upcoming Riots

[Hang on Sloopy]

Gotta love it

Portland's ENTIRE riot team quits after cop indicted for hitting 'photographer'

PORTLAND’S entire elite 50-member rapid response team voted unanimously to resign on Wednesday after a fellow officer was indicted for assaulting a woman with a baton during a riot that last summer…

www.the-sun.com

It is so sad that myself and 12 fellow patriots approve of this bullshit

We approve because we'd never want a loved one to suffer the horrors of you utter scum bag ITDS suffers (Infantile)

So, what are you going to do to reduce the murder rate then?

The worst murder rate in the first world, by about 4 or 5 times.

And yet any time anyone brings up sensible suggestions you knock them down.

"First world" is an arbitrary designation.

America's murder rate is actually in the middle of the pack.

Considering the Fact that so many of America's murders are committed in those areas dominated by immigrants from countrieswith high murder rates, it isn't a surprising fact. Maybe a wall to prevent these murder-hungry folks from coming across so easily- so we can vet who comes here?

In the middle of the pack if we include lots of poor countries.

Let's be arbitrary, I'm going to say Portugal and up is first world. Seems to be the lowest country on the list I might consider first world, though barely.

Lists of countries by GDP per capita - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of countries by intentional homicide rate - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Portugal 0.79 murder rate
Kuwait 1.8
Czech Republic 0.6
Estonia 2.12
Slovenia 0.48
Cyprus 1.26
Bahamas 30.9 (problem here is that the Bahamas isn't really first world, it's got a high GDP per capita, but that's because there are some very rich people dodging taxes)
Spain .62

I could go on, all the countries Portugal and above that have a high GDP per capita and have a lower level of income inequality (ie, poorer people have a relatively decent standard of living) will have much lower murder rate that the US which has 4.96.

The US is 94th in the world for murder (1st being the lowest murder rate)

The countries immediately below the US (slightly lower murder) are Kenya, Angola, Micronesia, Lithuania, Niger, Chile, North Korea, Latvia, Somalia, Turkmenistan.

Above it's Cuba, Kazakhstan, Sudan, Zambia, Greenland, Argentina, American Samoa, Suriname

Hardly countries that are used to be close to the US on such lists, wouldn't you say?

And then come the excuses. I'm sure plenty of European first world countries could fiddle with their statistics and say that those immigrants, those minorities, taken out would reduce their crime and murder rates further.

The point is the US has violent areas. Why?

Lots of reasons why, but the main one would be SELFISHNESS of the people and politicians.

I don't see it.

America is one of the least selfish nations on the Face of the Earth. We give more money to charity that almost anyone. When people are needed to sponsor little starving Ethiopian children, Sally Struthers appeals to Americans, not Eurotrash.

How many countries have you been to and lived in?

The US is a massively selfish country. The US gives more money to charity because the government doesn't. Giving money is often a feel good thing for rich people. They can tell their rich buddies how much they've given. Often it's given for RELIGIOUS reasons. Buying their way into heaven.

I went to the Lusaka fair in Zambia with a dairy farmer from Australia looking to help better dairy yields in that country. He went around talking to these guys with lots of money to hand out to people who want to do something.

Problem was, you could tell there was loads of corruption. These guys with the money weren't that interested in talking, they would take their massive cut, they money would probably go to friends or farmers who'd run off with it.

Essentially lots of charity money that'd not do anything for Zambia, other that encourage corruption.

But at least a bunch of rich people will feel good about themselves.

How did it work out in Zimbabwe driving the white farmers out or chopping them up.

In America that has never been covered. It is forbidden. Zimbabwe was a jewel at one time.

We are not allowed to even speak about SAfrica in America. The disaster of Mandela

 

[Weatherman2020]

I can't understand why anyone would support exempting some from the law.

.

That's exactly what the District Attorney is doing in refusing to enforce the law ...

.​

The DA has charged many.

How many has the DA charged after 3 years of nonstop violent riots?

 

[BlackSand]

The DA has charged many.

.

The District Attorney stated he was wasn't going to enforce the laws, and listed the ones he was going to ignore.
Stop trying to obfuscate and make excuses.

.​

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yeah. Your country would have what companies in it? All the tech companies would be on our side. You would have the defense companies. No wait. They are in Blue States too. All of your cars would be imports. Schools and Universities would teach creationism and no sex Ed.

I doubt that. On your side, you would have a 50% corporate or higher tax on top of others. Business regulations would be so costly it wouldn't be worth staying there. Because of no police, or police so weak they had no ability to do anything, crime would be so bad nobody would want to be there business or residents.

It's so funny. In SF, all the Walgreens are closing up because they created a law that unless a shoplifter has $1,000 of merchandise, the police can't do much to them. In Chicago, Mayor Lightweight created police policy that police can no longer chase suspects. If an officer wants to pursue a suspect, he or she has to call in, get permission from their supervisor, and only after getting that permission could they start chasing the suspect, who by that time, will be six blocks away from the time they start.

In all these liberal cities, they are experiencing double digit violent crime and murders. Yeah, I have a great idea, let's de-fund police even more. New York is experiencing record number of police officers taking early retirement or leaving to work in a better environment.

Imagine if we divided the country in two, and your entire country had to live this way.

 

[SavannahMann]

Yeah. Your country would have what companies in it? All the tech companies would be on our side. You would have the defense companies. No wait. They are in Blue States too. All of your cars would be imports. Schools and Universities would teach creationism and no sex Ed.

I doubt that. On your side, you would have a 50% corporate or higher tax on top of others. Business regulations would be so costly it wouldn't be worth staying there. Because of no police, or police so weak they had no ability to do anything, crime would be so bad nobody would want to be there business or residents.

It's so funny. In SF, all the Walgreens are closing up because they created a law that unless a shoplifter has $1,000 of merchandise, the police can't do much to them. In Chicago, Mayor Lightweight created police policy that police can no longer chase suspects. If an officer wants to pursue a suspect, he or she has to call in, get permission from their supervisor, and only after getting that permission could they start chasing the suspect, who by that time, will be six blocks away from the time they start.

In all these liberal cities, they are experiencing double digit violent crime and murders. Yeah, I have a great idea, let's de-fund police even more. New York is experiencing record number of police officers taking early retirement or leaving to work in a better environment.

Imagine if we divided the country in two, and your entire country had to live this way.

Much of the violence we are dealing with is a direct result of the get tough on crime idiocy we suffered through starting in the 80’s. The famous Three Strikes nonsense.

If you have nothing to lose why not fight? Let’s say that you know you are facing Life in Prison. What have you got to lose? Why not commit another murder? Why not commit another rape? What have you got to lose? When the cops come, why not fight? Why not kill a cop?

If you take away hope you take away the motivation to improve or change. That is basic human survival skill. Then you insure that the prisons are underfunded and are little more than law of the jungle warehouses. Then petty criminals with a fair chance at turning their lives around emerge as hardened criminals. Career criminals.

People of your ilk love to claim that other nations are shitholes. Well we are becoming one. And it isn’t because we aren’t tough enough on crime. It is because we are too vengeful and too cheap to address it.

Other nations have a much lower recidivism rate. It is because they focus on rehabilitation. As a result they have fewer criminals. Fewer repeat offenders. And lower populations in prison as a percentage.

But even mention something like that and you get a diatribe about how it won’t be 100% effective and therefor can’t even be tried.

If on the other hand we were able to cut our repeat offenders down by half wouldn’t that save money in the long run? Not just in prisons but in every other facet of the Justice System.

We have been doing it your way. And it hasn’t worked. Instead of admitting defeat you demand we double down. Like the Socialists you despise you won’t accept that your philosophy is flawed. It just hasn’t been tried. Not fully.

Isn’t it curious that those are the same excuses that Communists and Socialists use to explain the failures so far?

 

[SavannahMann]

Gotta love it

Portland's ENTIRE riot team quits after cop indicted for hitting 'photographer'

PORTLAND’S entire elite 50-member rapid response team voted unanimously to resign on Wednesday after a fellow officer was indicted for assaulting a woman with a baton during a riot that last summer…

www.the-sun.com

It is so sad that myself and 12 fellow patriots approve of this bullshit

We approve because we'd never want a loved one to suffer the horrors of you utter scum bag ITDS suffers (Infantile)

So, what are you going to do to reduce the murder rate then?

The worst murder rate in the first world, by about 4 or 5 times.

And yet any time anyone brings up sensible suggestions you knock them down.

"First world" is an arbitrary designation.

America's murder rate is actually in the middle of the pack.

Considering the Fact that so many of America's murders are committed in those areas dominated by immigrants from countrieswith high murder rates, it isn't a surprising fact. Maybe a wall to prevent these murder-hungry folks from coming across so easily- so we can vet who comes here?

In the middle of the pack if we include lots of poor countries.

Let's be arbitrary, I'm going to say Portugal and up is first world. Seems to be the lowest country on the list I might consider first world, though barely.

Lists of countries by GDP per capita - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of countries by intentional homicide rate - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Portugal 0.79 murder rate
Kuwait 1.8
Czech Republic 0.6
Estonia 2.12
Slovenia 0.48
Cyprus 1.26
Bahamas 30.9 (problem here is that the Bahamas isn't really first world, it's got a high GDP per capita, but that's because there are some very rich people dodging taxes)
Spain .62

I could go on, all the countries Portugal and above that have a high GDP per capita and have a lower level of income inequality (ie, poorer people have a relatively decent standard of living) will have much lower murder rate that the US which has 4.96.

The US is 94th in the world for murder (1st being the lowest murder rate)

The countries immediately below the US (slightly lower murder) are Kenya, Angola, Micronesia, Lithuania, Niger, Chile, North Korea, Latvia, Somalia, Turkmenistan.

Above it's Cuba, Kazakhstan, Sudan, Zambia, Greenland, Argentina, American Samoa, Suriname

Hardly countries that are used to be close to the US on such lists, wouldn't you say?

And then come the excuses. I'm sure plenty of European first world countries could fiddle with their statistics and say that those immigrants, those minorities, taken out would reduce their crime and murder rates further.

The point is the US has violent areas. Why?

Lots of reasons why, but the main one would be SELFISHNESS of the people and politicians.

I don't see it.

America is one of the least selfish nations on the Face of the Earth. We give more money to charity that almost anyone. When people are needed to sponsor little starving Ethiopian children, Sally Struthers appeals to Americans, not Eurotrash.

How many countries have you been to and lived in?

The US is a massively selfish country. The US gives more money to charity because the government doesn't. Giving money is often a feel good thing for rich people. They can tell their rich buddies how much they've given. Often it's given for RELIGIOUS reasons. Buying their way into heaven.

I went to the Lusaka fair in Zambia with a dairy farmer from Australia looking to help better dairy yields in that country. He went around talking to these guys with lots of money to hand out to people who want to do something.

Problem was, you could tell there was loads of corruption. These guys with the money weren't that interested in talking, they would take their massive cut, they money would probably go to friends or farmers who'd run off with it.

Essentially lots of charity money that'd not do anything for Zambia, other that encourage corruption.

But at least a bunch of rich people will feel good about themselves.

How did it work out in Zimbabwe driving the white farmers out or chopping them up.

In America that has never been covered. It is forbidden. Zimbabwe was a jewel at one time.

We are not allowed to even speak about SAfrica in America. The disaster of Mandela

South Africa was a disaster for decades before the end of Apartheid. When your idea of fair is insuring that the majority don’t get to vote, and have no rights, and are forced to live in Shantytowns. That nation is a disaster.

 

[Resnic]

He said he wouldn't charge people with no evidence. It happens at every protest and it needs to stop.

.

He said he wouldn't prosecute people charged with the crimes of "second degree disorderly conduct, interfering with police operations, or rioting."

You cannot in any way mysteriously change that into meaning he wants evidence.
You cannot mangle that into meaning he is in least bit interested in ensuring someone acts within the confines of the law.

Stop making up excuses ... They are not a rebuttal, and never will be.

.​

I did my share of protesting back over Vietnam, civil rights, etc., and we were always charged with things like disorderly conduct, interfering with police operations, rioting, etc., and the charges were bogus and almost always had to be dropped.
Think about it.
There is never anything illegal about disorderly conduct.
Government can not require conduct to be orderly, especially when it is a protest over far greater crimes by society in general, that you want to change.
And since "police operations" can and often is totally illegal, such as preventing a legal political demonstration, you DO have a right to interfere with police operations if they are illegal.
Rioting can be anything, but unless you are harming the individual rights of another person, the police have no authority to interfere at all.

Disorderly conduct, if it wasn't an offense it wouldn't have a name would it?

Honestly I'd expect nothing less from an old hippie saying he protested Vietnam, civil rights and such. So you won't see anything wrong with what you want. Just like the young protestors today think burning, looting stores, testing down public and private property, blocking traffic intimidating innocent bystanders and so on is perfectly legal to them because those morons can justify anything they want in their heads. All of you will come up with whatever you need to in order to think you're right and "the man" and "the establishment" are wrong and you are righteous.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Much of the violence we are dealing with is a direct result of the get tough on crime idiocy we suffered through starting in the 80’s. The famous Three Strikes nonsense.

If you have nothing to lose why not fight? Let’s say that you know you are facing Life in Prison. What have you got to lose? Why not commit another murder? Why not commit another rape? What have you got to lose? When the cops come, why not fight? Why not kill a cop?

If you take away hope you take away the motivation to improve or change. That is basic human survival skill. Then you insure that the prisons are underfunded and are little more than law of the jungle warehouses. Then petty criminals with a fair chance at turning their lives around emerge as hardened criminals. Career criminals.

People of your ilk love to claim that other nations are shitholes. Well we are becoming one. And it isn’t because we aren’t tough enough on crime. It is because we are too vengeful and too cheap to address it.

Other nations have a much lower recidivism rate. It is because they focus on rehabilitation. As a result they have fewer criminals. Fewer repeat offenders. And lower populations in prison as a percentage.

But even mention something like that and you get a diatribe about how it won’t be 100% effective and therefor can’t even be tried.

If on the other hand we were able to cut our repeat offenders down by half wouldn’t that save money in the long run? Not just in prisons but in every other facet of the Justice System.

We have been doing it your way. And it hasn’t worked. Instead of admitting defeat you demand we double down. Like the Socialists you despise you won’t accept that your philosophy is flawed. It just hasn’t been tried. Not fully.

Isn’t it curious that those are the same excuses that Communists and Socialists use to explain the failures so far?

No, we haven't been doing it my way, and haven't for quite a long time. Liberal judges interfered and labeled all methods of punishment as cruel and unusual punishment outside of imprisonment.

A person goes to prison. They have three square meals a day, plus snacks if they work in the prison or outsiders donate to their prison account. They have cable television, a workout room, a pool room, a field outside to play sports, a quiet private room where their girlfriend or spouse can stop over to start a family. They have a movie room, and even allow other inmates to bring in musical instruments to entertain the other convicts. They have phones to talk to people outside of prison, and even limited internet access. But the reason for our recidivism rate is because we don't offer rehabilitation? Are you Fn with me or what???

Search for the classic movie Cool Hand Luke. Watch what our prisons used to be like, and tell me if that wouldn't be a prison system that would greatly reduce recidivism rates.

 

[SavannahMann]

Much of the violence we are dealing with is a direct result of the get tough on crime idiocy we suffered through starting in the 80’s. The famous Three Strikes nonsense.

If you have nothing to lose why not fight? Let’s say that you know you are facing Life in Prison. What have you got to lose? Why not commit another murder? Why not commit another rape? What have you got to lose? When the cops come, why not fight? Why not kill a cop?

If you take away hope you take away the motivation to improve or change. That is basic human survival skill. Then you insure that the prisons are underfunded and are little more than law of the jungle warehouses. Then petty criminals with a fair chance at turning their lives around emerge as hardened criminals. Career criminals.

People of your ilk love to claim that other nations are shitholes. Well we are becoming one. And it isn’t because we aren’t tough enough on crime. It is because we are too vengeful and too cheap to address it.

Other nations have a much lower recidivism rate. It is because they focus on rehabilitation. As a result they have fewer criminals. Fewer repeat offenders. And lower populations in prison as a percentage.

But even mention something like that and you get a diatribe about how it won’t be 100% effective and therefor can’t even be tried.

If on the other hand we were able to cut our repeat offenders down by half wouldn’t that save money in the long run? Not just in prisons but in every other facet of the Justice System.

We have been doing it your way. And it hasn’t worked. Instead of admitting defeat you demand we double down. Like the Socialists you despise you won’t accept that your philosophy is flawed. It just hasn’t been tried. Not fully.

Isn’t it curious that those are the same excuses that Communists and Socialists use to explain the failures so far?

No, we haven't been doing it my way, and haven't for quite a long time. Liberal judges interfered and labeled all methods of punishment as cruel and unusual punishment outside of imprisonment.

A person goes to prison. They have three square meals a day, plus snacks if they work in the prison or outsiders donate to their prison account. They have cable television, a workout room, a pool room, a field outside to play sports, a quiet private room where their girlfriend or spouse can stop over to start a family. They have a movie room, and even allow other inmates to bring in musical instruments to entertain the other convicts. They have phones to talk to people outside of prison, and even limited internet access. But the reason for our recidivism rate is because we don't offer rehabilitation? Are you Fn with me or what???

Search for the classic movie Cool Hand Luke. Watch what our prisons used to be like, and tell me if that wouldn't be a prison system that would greatly reduce recidivism rates.

It didn’t reduce recidivism rates. It just didn’t reduce it.

Explain why other nations have a lower rate than we do.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Gotta love it

Portland's ENTIRE riot team quits after cop indicted for hitting 'photographer'

PORTLAND’S entire elite 50-member rapid response team voted unanimously to resign on Wednesday after a fellow officer was indicted for assaulting a woman with a baton during a riot that last summer…

www.the-sun.com

It is so sad that myself and 12 fellow patriots approve of this bullshit

We approve because we'd never want a loved one to suffer the horrors of you utter scum bag ITDS suffers (Infantile)

So, what are you going to do to reduce the murder rate then?

The worst murder rate in the first world, by about 4 or 5 times.

And yet any time anyone brings up sensible suggestions you knock them down.

"First world" is an arbitrary designation.

America's murder rate is actually in the middle of the pack.

Considering the Fact that so many of America's murders are committed in those areas dominated by immigrants from countrieswith high murder rates, it isn't a surprising fact. Maybe a wall to prevent these murder-hungry folks from coming across so easily- so we can vet who comes here?

In the middle of the pack if we include lots of poor countries.

Let's be arbitrary, I'm going to say Portugal and up is first world. Seems to be the lowest country on the list I might consider first world, though barely.

Lists of countries by GDP per capita - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of countries by intentional homicide rate - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Portugal 0.79 murder rate
Kuwait 1.8
Czech Republic 0.6
Estonia 2.12
Slovenia 0.48
Cyprus 1.26
Bahamas 30.9 (problem here is that the Bahamas isn't really first world, it's got a high GDP per capita, but that's because there are some very rich people dodging taxes)
Spain .62

I could go on, all the countries Portugal and above that have a high GDP per capita and have a lower level of income inequality (ie, poorer people have a relatively decent standard of living) will have much lower murder rate that the US which has 4.96.

The US is 94th in the world for murder (1st being the lowest murder rate)

The countries immediately below the US (slightly lower murder) are Kenya, Angola, Micronesia, Lithuania, Niger, Chile, North Korea, Latvia, Somalia, Turkmenistan.

Above it's Cuba, Kazakhstan, Sudan, Zambia, Greenland, Argentina, American Samoa, Suriname

Hardly countries that are used to be close to the US on such lists, wouldn't you say?

And then come the excuses. I'm sure plenty of European first world countries could fiddle with their statistics and say that those immigrants, those minorities, taken out would reduce their crime and murder rates further.

The point is the US has violent areas. Why?

Lots of reasons why, but the main one would be SELFISHNESS of the people and politicians.

First those countries are the size of one of our states so comparing that way is iffy.

When it comes to any American statistics I want to see 2 numbers

1- The overall number
2- The number less the blacks

If you took the Blacks out of US crime stats, we would be higher than the highest of any one of those

Same with educational stats. If you take the black equation out, We would be way way higher than the pathetic state we're in

Same with VD

Same with bastard making sport fucking

This is not racist, it is realist

No, comparing size is not "iffy" at all. You've literally said the problems in the US are in isolated areas. Now you're saying small countries are "iffy".

Oh, if you took blacks out of the statistics, as if black people don't live in the US and aren't being kept in ghettos made by white politicians. The problem here is that you want to try and pretend part of society doesn't exist. It does, and they're part of the statistics for a reason.

The reality is without black people, the rich people would find others to take their place. Someone else to blame, someone else to claim why things shouldn't be changed. That's the reality, it's a mentality thing.

Well when people compare Poland to us. What is the population of Poland. The size. I pay no heed

I know they are a part of the country but the most abysmal of all in stats.

You see I never really cared. My thought processes has caused me to never have a boss, to call every shot in my life, a very early retirement and a long happy marriage.

Have your thought processes yielded you these things. Would you change your thought processes to achieve that........Life is the simplest thing I ever saw in life, if you now how to do it

What difference does the population make? You keep bringing it up. We could go to size if you like.

Poland has a population of 38 million people.

California has a population of 37 million people.

Poland has a murder rate of .73

California has a murder rate of 4.3

List of U.S. states and territories by intentional homicide rate - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

So, what excuse are you going to use to explain away this. California is 24th out of 50, it's literally in the BOTTOM half of the murder rate for the USA.

But again, the US is a country and everything goes together. Every country has their good and bad. Take out the bad parts from Poland and you have a 0.1 murder rate.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Gotta love it

Portland's ENTIRE riot team quits after cop indicted for hitting 'photographer'

PORTLAND’S entire elite 50-member rapid response team voted unanimously to resign on Wednesday after a fellow officer was indicted for assaulting a woman with a baton during a riot that last summer…

www.the-sun.com

It is so sad that myself and 12 fellow patriots approve of this bullshit

We approve because we'd never want a loved one to suffer the horrors of you utter scum bag ITDS suffers (Infantile)

So, what are you going to do to reduce the murder rate then?

The worst murder rate in the first world, by about 4 or 5 times.

And yet any time anyone brings up sensible suggestions you knock them down.

"First world" is an arbitrary designation.

America's murder rate is actually in the middle of the pack.

Considering the Fact that so many of America's murders are committed in those areas dominated by immigrants from countrieswith high murder rates, it isn't a surprising fact. Maybe a wall to prevent these murder-hungry folks from coming across so easily- so we can vet who comes here?

In the middle of the pack if we include lots of poor countries.

Let's be arbitrary, I'm going to say Portugal and up is first world. Seems to be the lowest country on the list I might consider first world, though barely.

Lists of countries by GDP per capita - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of countries by intentional homicide rate - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Portugal 0.79 murder rate
Kuwait 1.8
Czech Republic 0.6
Estonia 2.12
Slovenia 0.48
Cyprus 1.26
Bahamas 30.9 (problem here is that the Bahamas isn't really first world, it's got a high GDP per capita, but that's because there are some very rich people dodging taxes)
Spain .62

I could go on, all the countries Portugal and above that have a high GDP per capita and have a lower level of income inequality (ie, poorer people have a relatively decent standard of living) will have much lower murder rate that the US which has 4.96.

The US is 94th in the world for murder (1st being the lowest murder rate)

The countries immediately below the US (slightly lower murder) are Kenya, Angola, Micronesia, Lithuania, Niger, Chile, North Korea, Latvia, Somalia, Turkmenistan.

Above it's Cuba, Kazakhstan, Sudan, Zambia, Greenland, Argentina, American Samoa, Suriname

Hardly countries that are used to be close to the US on such lists, wouldn't you say?

And then come the excuses. I'm sure plenty of European first world countries could fiddle with their statistics and say that those immigrants, those minorities, taken out would reduce their crime and murder rates further.

The point is the US has violent areas. Why?

Lots of reasons why, but the main one would be SELFISHNESS of the people and politicians.

I don't see it.

America is one of the least selfish nations on the Face of the Earth. We give more money to charity that almost anyone. When people are needed to sponsor little starving Ethiopian children, Sally Struthers appeals to Americans, not Eurotrash.

How many countries have you been to and lived in?

The US is a massively selfish country. The US gives more money to charity because the government doesn't. Giving money is often a feel good thing for rich people. They can tell their rich buddies how much they've given. Often it's given for RELIGIOUS reasons. Buying their way into heaven.

I went to the Lusaka fair in Zambia with a dairy farmer from Australia looking to help better dairy yields in that country. He went around talking to these guys with lots of money to hand out to people who want to do something.

Problem was, you could tell there was loads of corruption. These guys with the money weren't that interested in talking, they would take their massive cut, they money would probably go to friends or farmers who'd run off with it.

Essentially lots of charity money that'd not do anything for Zambia, other that encourage corruption.

But at least a bunch of rich people will feel good about themselves.

How did it work out in Zimbabwe driving the white farmers out or chopping them up.

In America that has never been covered. It is forbidden. Zimbabwe was a jewel at one time.

We are not allowed to even speak about SAfrica in America. The disaster of Mandela

I'm lost, why are we talking about Zimbabwe?

 

[LuckyDuck]

Portland needs to burn to the ground, with the Socialists in it.

 

[Godboy]

Spoiled brats, not tough enough too handle the job they volunteered for.

Who the hell can afford to possibly defend Fake Criminal charges that can be levied?

Resigning and backing away from such a risky situation is actually a smart and considerate idea, the officers are thinking about their family's future. They are counting on using their nest egg to pay their children's tuition and orthodontic bills, or retire. Not enrich some lawyer because of fake charges levied by a whining liberal DA at the behest of a rioter.

Yes, if the going gets tough, run away, don't suck it up and continue...The cops are wimps unlike the military which do or die...

Hell you fukterds hate the military when it is politically to your favor. You live by that rule

I am a two timer, I have two honorable discharges from the army, now sell your lies to someone else who is as stupid as you is.

Stupid as I "Is". I'm sure you were tops in your special needs classes.....Stupid as I is.....................LOLOLOL

I was a specialist in the army that is for sure, I am sorry you were a bolo. Cops need to stop being pampered and get tough or they will continue to get their asses handed to them. It's all about the discipline and control.

Police officers need to learn how to avoid trouble and ugly situations. If Officer Chauvin would have had the foresight to tell the storekeep complaining about George Floyd passing fake twenties to "call the Secret Service, counterfeit money isn't part of the responsibilities of the Minneapolis PD", he'd still be a free man today enjoying donuts and coffee at the local Krispy Kreme.

The problem only created a death when a cop took it too far and refused to care for the prisoner he had in his possession. His lack of prudence and over riding emotion cause a death. Life is all about control but Floyd and Chauvin lost control that day yet Floyd was the victim of a death by a lack of control.

What the fuck does Floyd have to do with Portland?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Spoiled brats, not tough enough too handle the job they volunteered for.

Tell that to someone getting their limbs ripped off there

Just because you enforce the law doesn't mean you are above the law or are a sovereign citizen.

What does “enforce the law” mean with you people these days? Asking law breakers nicely and gently to please cease what they are doing?

 

[pknopp]

I can't understand why anyone would support exempting some from the law.

.

That's exactly what the District Attorney is doing in refusing to enforce the law ...

.​

The DA has charged many.

How many has the DA charged after 3 years of nonstop violent riots?

I have no idea. I do not keep track of those stats.

 

[pknopp]

The DA has charged many.

.

The District Attorney stated he was wasn't going to enforce the laws, and listed the ones he was going to ignore.
Stop trying to obfuscate and make excuses.

.​

Not at laws should be enforced. You continue to argue things I agree with.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Portland needs to burn to the ground, with the Socialists in it.

I agree. This is so much fun to watch all this violence and seeing the people have to endure this...lolol.You voted for this...lololol

 

[BlackSand]

Not at laws should be enforced. You continue to argue things I agree with.

.

If we are going to pick and choose which laws shouldn't be enforced,
then you have business complaining when one isn't enforced equally, or if you are subjected to lawlessness.

You cannot twist it into something it isn't ... Stop making excuses.

.​

 

[pknopp]

Not at laws should be enforced. You continue to argue things I agree with.

.

If we are going to pick and choose which laws shouldn't be enforced,
then you have business complaining when one isn't enforced equally, or if you are subjected to lawlessness.

You cannot twist it into something it isn't ... Stop making excuses.

.​

Of course someone is going to complain. That's my position though. All are under the law or none are.

 

[BlackSand]

Of course someone is going to complain. That's my position though. All are under the law or none are.

.

Correction ... All are under the law, some laws the District Attorney refuses to prosecute.
Stop making excuses ... That will never change.

.​