Poll: Who has enforcement authority of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution?

[Curried Goats]

Does it take an act of Congress for States to disqualify you from posting because you have no brain?

Are you lashing out at me personally because you feel intellectually inadequate to answer my question seriously?

 

[skews13]

Since you failed to back up all your lies in this post let me educate you.

Section 5 lists only on entity having enforcement
Power. Congress.

And that power is over the entire article, Moron.

Wrong.

It says Congress shall have power by appropriate legislation.

Tenth Amendment​

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

​

 

[Concerned American]

Are you lashing out at me personally because you feel intellectually inadequate to answer my question seriously?

I think you are being less than serious. To compare a person's participation in an undeclared insurrection to an age requirement would naturally prompt my response. The only intellectual inadequacy that was demonstrated was your own and your post is evidence.

 

[Curried Goats]

I think you are being less than serious. To compare a person's participation in an undeclared insurrection to an age requirement would naturally prompt my response. The only intellectual inadequacy that was demonstrated was your own and your post is evidence.

The only thing I'm comparing between the two is that each are provisions in the constitution for qualifications to hold the Office. If States don't require an act of Congress to disqualify someone because of the age restriction why do they need an act of Congress to disqualify someone for any other disqualifying provision?

 

[meaner gene]

I think you are being less than serious. To compare a person's participation in an undeclared insurrection to an age requirement would naturally prompt my response. The only intellectual inadequacy that was demonstrated was your own and your post is evidence.

Taylor Swift is 34 years old
Can she run for president?

 

[Clipper]

You made the statement, moron. As usual you are spouting garbage like the third grader that you are. Go take a nap, junior.

Go take another shot at Trump's ass, assface.

 

[OKTexas]

Does it take an act of Congress for States to disqualify someone because they aren't of age?

What age would that be?

.

 

[OKTexas]

Taylor Swift is 34 years old
Can she run for president?

Yes.

.

 

[Concerned American]

The only thing I'm comparing between the two is that each are provisions in the constitution for qualifications to hold the Office. If States don't require an act of Congress to disqualify someone because of the age restriction why do they need an act of Congress to disqualify someone for any other disqualifying provision?

Because---the constitution.

 

[meaner gene]

What age would that be?

.

Taylor Swift is 34 years old
Can she run for president?

You have to be 35 to be president

 

[Nostra]

Only the parts in conflict with the 14th, pertaining to enforcement of the 14th.

Remember, it overrode the due process and compensation requirements of the 5th.

But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

 

[Curried Goats]

What age would that be?

.

Article 2 section 1 of the Constitution states that you have to be 35 to hold the Office of President.

 

[Curried Goats]

Because---the constitution.

Because the constitution what?

 

[Concerned American]

Because the constitution what?

Look at your post #124. You asked the question, "If States don't require an act of Congress to disqualify someone because of the age restriction why do they need an act of Congress to disqualify someone for any other disqualifying provision?" My answer, the constitution. The constitution is very clear about age and it is easy to establish. An insurrection is a criminal act and according to the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments of the constitution a person accused of a crime is afforded DUE PROCESS. There has been no insurrection charged or recognized by any federal branch of the government (or anyone else for that matter.) CO supremes have not been assigned that duty in the constitution as the 14th amendment clearly states that enforcement is the purview of the US congress. The bottom line is there has been no insurrection so any penalties or ballot bans as the result of an insurrection (which clearly didn't happen) are moot. That is why in a 4 amendment nutshell of ---- the constitution.

 

[Curried Goats]

Look at your post #124. You asked the question, "If States don't require an act of Congress to disqualify someone because of the age restriction why do they need an act of Congress to disqualify someone for any other disqualifying provision?" My answer, the constitution. The constitution is very clear about age and it is easy to establish.

The constitution is clear on insurrection after taking an oath of office to be a disqualify act at well. Are you arguing it's ambiguous?

An insurrection is a criminal act and according to the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments of the constitution a person accused of a crime is afforded DUE PROCESS. There has been no insurrection charged or recognized by any federal branch of the government (or anyone else for that matter.) CO supremes have not been assigned that duty in the constitution as the 14th amendment clearly states that enforcement is the purview of the US congress. The bottom line is there has been no insurrection so any penalties or ballot bans as the result of an insurrection (which clearly didn't happen) are moot. That is why in a 4 amendment nutshell of ---- the constitution.

Where does the 14th say anything about conviction for a crime? As for due process to determine if Trump is an insurrectionist and thus barred from the ballot, he got that. There was a trail with evidence and everything. It just wasn't a criminal trial because it wasn't a criminal case.

 

[meaner gene]

My answer, the constitution. The constitution is very clear about age and it is easy to establish. An insurrection is a criminal act and according to the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments of the constitution a person accused of a crime is afforded DUE PROCESS.

Miley Cyrus just turned 31 years old.
Is she eligible to run for president?
And who would have to take her off the ballot?

 

[OKTexas]

Taylor Swift is 34 years old
Can she run for president?

You have to be 35 to be president

To be president yes, to run, as you said, NO. Swift will be 35 more than a month before inauguration day.

.

 

[Concerned American]

The constitution is clear on insurrection after taking an oath of office to be a disqualify act at well. Are you arguing it's ambiguous?

Where does the 14th say anything about conviction for a crime? As for due process to determine if Trump is an insurrectionist and thus barred from the ballot, he got that there was a trail with evidence and everything. It just wasn't a criminal trial because it wasn't a criminal case.

Insurrection is a crime. 18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection In order to ascertain guilt in the commission a crime, due process is required under the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments. There has been no such determination that the crime of insurrection occurred let alone who committed it. I referenced the 14th to illustrate that enforcement is clearly the purview of the US congress--not the states. The democrat partisan theater is Nothing Burger.

 

[meaner gene]

To be president yes, to run, as you said, NO. Swift will be 35 more than a month before inauguration day.

.

Now do Miley Cyrus age 31
Can she be elected president in 2024

 

[Curried Goats]

To be president yes, to run, as you said, NO. Swift will be 35 more than a month before inauguration day.

.

Congress doesn't have to convict Miley Cyrus of being too young first do they?