Police warn protesters Texas gun owners can shoot you on site if you mess with out confederate statu

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,743
2,040
POLICE WARN PROTESTERS: TEXAS GUN OWNERS CAN SHOOT YOU ON SIGHT IF...
upload_2017-8-20_16-2-15.png


Oh this could be a disaster waiting to happen and it won't be in favor of the gun owner either.
 
It should be the law of the land that if anyone violently interferes with peaceful protesters, they can and should be shot.
 
Nothing liberals would like more than someone to shoot one of their "peaceful protesters", even in self defense. They know the media would spin it to their advantage.
 
Last edited:
You frickin' idiots have one answer for everything you don't agree with, kill it...Which religion is the religion of hate now?
 
You frickin' idiots have one answer for everything you don't agree with, kill it...Which religion is the religion of hate now?

Where was religion mentioned?

Hear the news from Spain and Finland? The Amish went beserk again
 
Last edited:

Learn how to research A.H.

upload_2017-8-20_17-16-25.png



In Texas, Criminal Mischief (Vandalism) is a crime. So, let’s say someone is defacing or destroying a monument or a statue, not that it happens, just a hypothetical. That would be Criminal Mischief under Texas Penal Code:

28.03. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF.

(a) A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner:

(1) he intentionally or knowingly damages or destroys the tangible property of the owner;
(2) he intentionally or knowingly tampers with the tangible property of the owner and causes pecuniary loss or substantial inconvenience to the owner or a third person; or
(3) he intentionally or knowingly makes markings, including inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings, on the tangible property of the owner.

Texas Penal Code Chapter 9, which are the laws concerning the use of force and deadly force to protect yourself, someone else, your property, or someone else’s property (could be state, county or municipal property (the peoples). In Chapter 9 under defense of property it says:

Sec. 9.43. PROTECTION OF THIRD PERSON’S PROPERTY.

A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under

Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property;

Chapter 9.41 states: PROTECTION OF ONE’S OWN PROPERTY.

(a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property (Criminal Mischief is unlawful interference with property).

Chapter 9.42 states: DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY.

A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:

PROTESTERS WARNED! Texas Gun Owners Can Shoot You On Sight If You Mess With Our Statues – Army
 
When Texicans get bored and want to shoot something but don't have a target, they usually end up shooting themselves..
 
If a person uses a publicly owned street sign as target practice, can they be executed by another?
 

Learn how to research A.H.

View attachment 145040


In Texas, Criminal Mischief (Vandalism) is a crime. So, let’s say someone is defacing or destroying a monument or a statue, not that it happens, just a hypothetical. That would be Criminal Mischief under Texas Penal Code:

28.03. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF.

(a) A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner:

(1) he intentionally or knowingly damages or destroys the tangible property of the owner;
(2) he intentionally or knowingly tampers with the tangible property of the owner and causes pecuniary loss or substantial inconvenience to the owner or a third person; or
(3) he intentionally or knowingly makes markings, including inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings, on the tangible property of the owner.

Texas Penal Code Chapter 9, which are the laws concerning the use of force and deadly force to protect yourself, someone else, your property, or someone else’s property (could be state, county or municipal property (the peoples). In Chapter 9 under defense of property it says:

Sec. 9.43. PROTECTION OF THIRD PERSON’S PROPERTY.

A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under

Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property;

Chapter 9.41 states: PROTECTION OF ONE’S OWN PROPERTY.

(a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property (Criminal Mischief is unlawful interference with property).

Chapter 9.42 states: DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY.

A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:

PROTESTERS WARNED! Texas Gun Owners Can Shoot You On Sight If You Mess With Our Statues – Army


Thats what I love about Texas.
I can shoot you for damn near any reason.
 
It should be the law of the land that if anyone violently interferes with peaceful protesters, they can and should be shot.
I live in Wisconsin and I'd be willing to travel to Texas to help take care of their ANTI FIRST AMENDMENT problem.
 

Forum List

Back
Top