You only think you know me but you don't. It seems that you believe people are all bad or all good. People - like the planet's climate - are more complex than that. Of course I know more science than you do. You don't have a clue what drives the climate of the planet. I do. It's called bipolar glaciation which was driven by plate tectonics and resulted in thermally isolated polar regions with totally different characteristics because of their unique geometry at each pole. That you believe that computer models are science is proof that you don't know science. Science is the study of nature to identify the order within nature so as to be able to make predictions of nature. Computer programs aren't mentioned in that definition. Maybe if climate scientists spent more time analyzing satellite data to validate their data their models wouldn't be so wrong. And I do have the knowledge to say they have feedback backwards. It's called the geologic record. There is absolutely no way the earth could have transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet if those feedbacks were positive. The only way the planet could have been cooling for 50 million years is if the feedbacks were negative. Prove me wrong. Tell me why the planet cooled for 50 MILLION YEARS. Because that implies a continuous process was at work. So what was that continuous process if it wasn't due to the negative feedback of water vapor and cloud formation? Orbital cycles have always existed, so no. The only thing the orbital cycles are responsible for are triggering glacial cycles when the temperature is near the threshold for extensive glaciation.That does not excuse your lack of compassion or concern.
You do not.
Of course they are.
You have neither the knowledge nor expertise in atmospheric physics, thermodynamics or climate modeling to make that argument.
But you have no evidence to support such a belief.*
You have no evidence to support that belief either.*
Orbital cycles. Global temperatures hung a U-turn in 1900, reversing a 5,000-year chill-down
* - A claim that something unexplained happened in the past is not evidence to support your claims