Philip Seymour Hoffman is dead

it is you who are a liar. you defended unsubstantiated claim made by Political Junky without eve thinking that he/she/it should provide any proof for the made claim but demanded that from when I called the claim BS.

That makes you both a liar and a defender of drug glorification - as stating that drug overdose does not happen when drugs are not criminalized is the idiocy in it's purest form.

so you can chose - are you a liar or simply and idiot.

The only unsubstantiated claim was you response of "not true". I only pointed out that you provided zero facts to back up your statement.

Opposing prohibition doesn't equal glorification. Nobody said overdose doesn't happen when drugs are legal. Quit making shit up. Again, people can go back and read what was typed. You are a lying piece of shit. Never quote me again, unless you are willing to acknowledge what it is that I really said.

don't lie. the unsubstantiated claim was that people don't die of overdose when drugs are made legal ( which is idiocy ) made by Political Junky - yet you seem to swallow that without any demand of proof which is definitely needed when somebody states something like that.

Is it because you agree with this idiocy?

then - PROVE it :D
or stop lying.
 
it is you who are a liar. you defended unsubstantiated claim made by Political Junky without eve thinking that he/she/it should provide any proof for the made claim but demanded that from when I called the claim BS.

That makes you both a liar and a defender of drug glorification - as stating that drug overdose does not happen when drugs are not criminalized is the idiocy in it's purest form.

so you can chose - are you a liar or simply and idiot.

The only unsubstantiated claim was you response of "not true". I only pointed out that you provided zero facts to back up your statement.

Opposing prohibition doesn't equal glorification. Nobody said overdose doesn't happen when drugs are legal. Quit making shit up. Again, people can go back and read what was typed. You are a lying piece of shit. Never quote me again, unless you are willing to acknowledge what it is that I really said.

don't lie. the unsubstantiated claim was that people don't die of overdose when drugs are made legal ( which is idiocy ) made by Political Junky - yet you seem to swallow that without any demand of proof which is definitely needed when somebody states something like that.

Is it because you agree with this idiocy?

then - PROVE it :D
or stop lying.

Show me where he said nobody overdoses when drugs are legal. Simple request.

PROVE IT!
 
Where, EXACTLY, did I say pot is "harmless"?
Where, EXACTLY, did I "glorify drug legalization"?
How, EXACTLY, have I "enabled" drug addiction?

you did not? you are an exception for your leftard crowd which is bend in awe on the prospect of pot legalization?

are you against it?

I don't do drugs myself.

I do know a girl who was born with spina bifida and she was on all sorts of strong prescription drugs and her doctor got her off oxy and put her on med pot and she seems to be doing a lot better.

It seems to me that under supervision there is some benefit to it.


:dunno:

What do you think about it?

To vox, that means you glorify all drugs, want all drugs legal, enable drug abuse.
 
The only unsubstantiated claim was you response of "not true". I only pointed out that you provided zero facts to back up your statement.

Opposing prohibition doesn't equal glorification. Nobody said overdose doesn't happen when drugs are legal. Quit making shit up. Again, people can go back and read what was typed. You are a lying piece of shit. Never quote me again, unless you are willing to acknowledge what it is that I really said.

don't lie. the unsubstantiated claim was that people don't die of overdose when drugs are made legal ( which is idiocy ) made by Political Junky - yet you seem to swallow that without any demand of proof which is definitely needed when somebody states something like that.

Is it because you agree with this idiocy?

then - PROVE it :D
or stop lying.

Show me where he said nobody overdoses when drugs are legal. Simple request.

PROVE IT!

:lol:

Where drugs are legal, and addicts get their shots administered, this kind of tragedy is rare.

now - where is your demand for the proof of such a statement?
 
I don't do drugs myself.

I do know a girl who was born with spina bifida and she was on all sorts of strong prescription drugs and her doctor got her off oxy and put her on med pot and she seems to be doing a lot better.

It seems to me that under supervision there is some benefit to it.


:dunno:

What do you think about it?
I think you have an intelligent outlook.

If more Americans felt the way you do it would be possible to put an end to one of the most menacingly destructive preoccupations of our misguided and corrupted government, which is the grossly wasteful and counterproductive War on Drugs.
 
Pretty damn sad that folks can't express sadness at the death of a great actor without it turning AGAIN into a slugfest.

I agree.

He was an extremely talented man who left a very impressive body of work.

I'd like see how the nasty liars here can compare with him and his accomplishments.
 
you did not? you are an exception for your leftard crowd which is bend in awe on the prospect of pot legalization?

are you against it?

I don't do drugs myself.

I do know a girl who was born with spina bifida and she was on all sorts of strong prescription drugs and her doctor got her off oxy and put her on med pot and she seems to be doing a lot better.

It seems to me that under supervision there is some benefit to it.


:dunno:

What do you think about it?

To vox, that means you glorify all drugs, want all drugs legal, enable drug abuse.

so you want pot legal and consider it harmless?
 
Where, EXACTLY, did I say pot is "harmless"?
Where, EXACTLY, did I "glorify drug legalization"?
How, EXACTLY, have I "enabled" drug addiction?

you did not? you are an exception for your leftard crowd which is bend in awe on the prospect of pot legalization?

are you against it?

Why are you asking? You already said you know what I believe.

If you wouldn't lie, you wouldn't have to come back with this lame ass demand for what I really believe.

Piss off, liar.

becasue if you re against it - you can state it right now - clearly and openly and I will consider you the only one leftard which agrees pot is harmful and is against it's legalization. And if you will answer the question I might apologize to you if you are not the part of sheeple on the issue.

But you know you won't - as you are a part of the glorification crowd :lol:
 
Let it be a reminder of how bad opiates can **** you up. Doesn't have to be heroin. Oxy or Codeine will do the same thing. Heroin is a hard one to kick. He's probably better off dead.
 
When did I say anything to the contrary? Luddly is right. You are a liar.



You can't just say "not true". People expect you to backup your bullshit with facts sometimes.

people can expect whatever they want. but only after they provide the proof to their bogus claim( where drugs are legal this tragedy does not happen) - and that idiocy did not require proof for you as I see. :lol:

your defense of this bogus claim proves exactly that - your personal glorification of the drug usage.

so stop lying and state it openly.

I never said a single thing you claim I did, and neither did Luddly. That's why you are a liar. Just admit you made shit up about us. Admit that we said nothing you claimed we did. Admit that you are a ******* liar. You know people can read your bullshit to confirm that, right? You even quoted the shit you lied about. Don't quote something I said, and make up your own narrative as you go along, you ******* snake.
If you walk past two men standing on a corner engaged in an obviously pointless and foolish argument, do you bother to determine which of them is the fool -- if not both? Or do you not waste your time and just keep walking?

If the latter, then that is what the Ignore feature is for.
 
Sick and disgusted seeing people stupidly getting involved with drugs. You choose to start, you deal with the consequences.

Sorry for his family, not sorry for him.
 
Where, EXACTLY, did I say pot is "harmless"?
Where, EXACTLY, did I "glorify drug legalization"?
How, EXACTLY, have I "enabled" drug addiction?

you did not? you are an exception for your leftard crowd which is bend in awe on the prospect of pot legalization?

are you against it?

I don't do drugs myself.

I do know a girl who was born with spina bifida and she was on all sorts of strong prescription drugs and her doctor got her off oxy and put her on med pot and she seems to be doing a lot better.

It seems to me that under supervision there is some benefit to it.


:dunno:

What do you think about it?

people use morphine and other opiates everyday. when it is prescribed and considered a drug, is controlled and used as a medication, not a recreational activity.

same can be done with marijuana or any other addictive drug, for that matter. Cocaine solution is used in some instances as local anesthetic and it is a very good one for those uses.

But neither morphine, nor hydromorphone, nor cocaine solution as local anesthetic is considered as "harmless" "recreational" activity.

Pot is.
But is is addictive and harmful in many ways and in some instances - worse than opiates.

Should it be decriminalized? Yes. it should.

Should it be glorified as it is now? No.
And it is not only glorified it is basically propagated by many sources - with information which is not only deceitful but simply untrue.
 
15th post
Sick and disgusted seeing people stupidly getting involved with drugs. You choose to start, you deal with the consequences.

Sorry for his family, not sorry for him.

I have remorse for drug addicts. A lot of times their addiction are just a result of really bad childhoods and other pressures. Cigarette smokers are addicts.
 
now - where is your demand for the proof of such a statement?

So... what he said wasn't what you said he said? You didn't come out and admit to lying, but at least it's a step forward.

So, where is your demand for the proof of PJ statement, liar?

First off all, I didn't agree with him. I stated that "not true" isn't a legitimate rebuttal to anything. He didn't say that overdoses don't happen. You lied.

As for overdoses being rare when legalized, heroin would be regulated the same way legal drugs are. These deadly concoctions would be removed from the market. What was once done in a dark alley could be done in a clinic with clean needles.

It's the same as areas where prostitution is legal, and they are required to take tests for STDs. Pushing these products into the dark haven't stopped people from using them, as Hoffman's story proves.

Make them legal, and allow the government to regulate and tax them. Quit requiring addicts to go to some shady dealer in a back alley, so he can get a dirty product, and nobody can be held responsible.
 
Should it be glorified as it is now? No.
And it is not only glorified it is basically propagated by many sources - with information which is not only deceitful but simply untrue.

Nobody is glorifying it. You are making shit up. Show me a post where somebody glorified it, or stop making shit up. You are a liar.
 
Back
Top Bottom