Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 90,464
- 82,228
- 3,615
Show us what he knows vs what he says.Link to what?
Ya know, back up your bullshit.
Betcha canāt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show us what he knows vs what he says.Link to what?
So you think Hegseth is incapable of lying?Show us what he knows vs what he says.
Ya know, back up your bullshit.
Betcha canāt.
So you think Hegseth is incapable of lying?
I just canāt deal with your abject stupidity today.Keep squirmingā¦..
I do know you lie, daily.
The New York Times?! Thatās your source? The leftist media has been lying to you for four years, and you STILL go back and hold them up as the purveyors of the truth?I'm sure you think so, but it's still obvious how this administration operates.
I found this article enlightening. I doubt you'd read it. We could come up with dozens of examples.
Elon Musk stood before a giant American flag at a Wisconsin political rally in March and rolled out an eye-popping allegation of rampant fraud at the Social Security Administration. Scammers, he said, were making 40 percent of all calls to the agencyās customer service line.
Social Security employees knew the billionaireās claim had no basis in fact. After journalists followed up, staff members began drafting a response correcting the record.
Thatās when Leland Dudek ā plucked from a midlevel job only six weeks earlier to run Social Security because of his willingness to cooperate with Mr. Muskās Department of Government Efficiency ā got an angry call from the White House, according to several people familiar with the exchange.
āThe number is 40 percent,ā insisted Katie Miller, a top administration aide who was working closely with Mr. Musk, according to one of the people familiar with the April 1 call. President Trump believed Mr. Musk, she said. āDo not contradict the president.ā
Is that the gal from CNN?The leaker of the classified report is going to jail.
The reporter is the same reporter who claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian fake.
Just like the Dobbs SCOTUS decision leaker should have.
Given Hegsethās ranting and raving against the media, I can only assume the media is right about their initial assessment of the air strikeās damage to the Iranian nuclear program. The pilots did a fantastic job, but the question is what did the air strikes do to halt the Iranian nuclear program. That is the question, The answer seems to be not much. It is not to say there was not extensive damage around the areas and to some facilities, but, based on the preliminary information, the Iranian nuclear program was set back but not for years.
So youāre ignoring what doesnāt fit with your narrative. NY Times isnāt perfect but their track record is WAY better than anyone you believe.The New York Times?! Thatās your source? The leftist media has been lying to you for four years, and you STILL go back and hold them up as the purveyors of the truth?
It really is remarkable, how it's apparently a requirement that every administration interview has to include an adversarial, pugilistic approach with the media. It must be by design, because they're ready to blow the minute things get started. I don't know if I've seen a calm interview yet with one of them.Given Hegsethās ranting and raving against the media, I can only assume the media is right about their initial assessment of the air strikeās damage to the Iranian nuclear program. The pilots did a fantastic job, but the question is what did the air strikes do to halt the Iranian nuclear program. That is the question, The answer seems to be not much. It is not to say there was not extensive damage around the areas and to some facilities, but, based on the preliminary information, the Iranian nuclear program was set back but not for years.

What did I say that was inaccurate? The question is what did the bombing do to halt the Iranian nuclear program? I wrote that based on preliminary information not much, but that may change as information is released. I could change my opinion once more info is released.
BTW when Hegseth comes about and the first things out of his mouth is screeching about the media, he does nothing to help his cause.
The NYT is a left-wing rag that covered for a president with pretty severe dementia, and will lie like a rug in order to avoid giving Trump credit for blocking The Islamic Terrorist from acquiring nukes. Which, by the way, youāre doing.So youāre ignoring what doesnāt fit with your narrative. NY Times isnāt perfect but their track record is WAY better than anyone you believe.
When a lawyer for the DoJ said that Kilmar Abrego Garcia was deported in error, what happened? She was fired.
People are fired from government for telling the truth is that truth doesnāt fit the lies Trump wants you to believe. Thatās just how these guys operate.
Thereās so many examples.
Do you remember the time Trump told the DoJ to ājust say it was corruptā?
![]()
Hearing: Trump told Justice Dept. to call election 'corrupt'
Former top Justice Department officials have testified to the Jan. 6 committee that President Donald Trump hounded the department to pursue his false election fraud claims.apnews.com
Who could forget Trump going after NOAA because they didnāt say hurricane Dorian would hit Alabama?
Thereās nothing too small.
The NYT is a left-wing rag that covered for a president with pretty severe dementia, and will lie like a rug in order to avoid giving Trump credit for blocking The Islamic Terrorist from acquiring nukes. Which, by the way, youāre doing.
Are you leftists so arrogant that you canāt admit Trump has done well? Youād rather undermine America than admit that the country made the right decision choosing him over the DEI idiot who canāt answer a simple question.
Nah. Thatās just what you want to believe because they donāt repeat the lies you are so desperate to believe. Notice how you donāt address any of the examples of Trump going after people who speak truth he doesnāt want to beliefs. You just whine about The NY Times. Itās not like you ever tell us who you believe, because itās too embarrassing for you to admit.The NYT is a left-wing rag that covered for a president with pretty severe dementia, and will lie like a rug in order to avoid giving Trump credit for blocking The Islamic Terrorist from acquiring nukes. Which, by the way, youāre doing.
Are you leftists so arrogant that you canāt admit Trump has done well? Youād rather undermine America than admit that the country made the right decision choosing him over the DEI idiot who canāt answer a simple question.
Except it came from the actual DIA, so why you appear to be calling people asking traitors is just weird.Stop digging, ******.
This is good stuff. He is spitting facts. He addresses the report the media got leaked and decided to cherry pick facts.
FFS. Obama set in motion a deal so HORRIBLE that he had to bypass Congress and go to the antisemitic UN to get it through. And it was fraught with holes that allowed the Terrorist Regime to get nukes.Nah. Thatās just what you want to believe because they donāt repeat the lies you are so desperate to believe. Notice how you donāt address any of the examples of Trump going after people who speak truth he doesnāt want to beliefs. You just whine about The NY Times. Itās not like you ever tell us who you believe, because itās too embarrassing for you to admit.
Call me a liar if you want, but Iāve been saying that we donāt really know anything yet.
Iāve also said that thereās no military solution here. Only a diplomatic one. Trump ruined the best diplomatic solution with the JCPOA, but you wonāt give credit to Obama for that.
You lack any sense of objectivity. You basically worship Trump.
No, the problem is you're to ******* stupid to understand what I wrote.That's a really stupid ******* opinion that you have there.
Nice response there. Did you get that from your kindergarten classmate?Stop digging, ******.
Hey, since youāre so smart, you should know the difference between ātoā and ātoo.āNo, the problem is you're to ******* stupid to understand what I wrote.