Perhaps the best test of alternate realities - clear video of the shooting

She didn't hit anyone.
The moron shouldn't have been ANYWHERE near the front of ANY running car.
The very basics of police cadet training.

YES.

LOL.
Quickly for a turtle.
She never came close.

No shit.
That's exactly what Barney Fife did.
I would have kicked the shit out of him, then recommend he be fired.
I may even have shot him myself.
Proof he shouldn't be anywhere near a gun, let alone possess one.
It is so easy not to worry about ICE
01KES8X3HKAZNM9NQRP8MB69J4.webp
 
She tried to maneuver around the officers and their vehicles. One cop would have none of it and shot her dead.
Exactly. And that's what the investigation will conclude.
 
This thread is less about the Minnesota shooting and more about how America has split into two different realities.

President Trump, Vice President Vance, Secretary Noem and most MAGAs on this site are saying the ICE agent was "hit" or "run over".

This is easily the clearest view of the positioning of the vehicle and the shooter. At :09, she puts the vehicle in drive, you can see the tires turning to the right, and the shooting begins.

Please view this video and describe how the agent is "hit". Or, please tell me if you think Trump, Vance, Noem and MAGA are lying.

PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT YOU SEE.


.03 seconds to react. First shot goes through windshield. Officer has no way of predicting she will turn.
Why does the left ignore this obvious fact?
 
They hate Trump, and believe their hatred makes them immune to accusations of wrongdoing.
And when elected Democrats tell them to put their bodies on the line, get in their faces, calls ICE Gestapo, and they are kidnapping people, what the hell do the Dems expect?
 
She didn't hit anyone.

She did, but like I said, it doesn't matter if she succeeded in the assault, just that she committed the assault.

LOL.
Quickly for a turtle.
She never came close.

You obviously haven't seen the video from the front.

That's exactly what Barney Fife did.
I would have kicked the shit out of him, then recommend he be fired.
I may even have shot him myself.
Proof he shouldn't be anywhere near a gun, let alone possess one.

Not sure what you are talking about here. The point I was making was that if you attempt to assault a police officer, you must deal with the consequences.
 
She did, but like I said, it doesn't matter if she succeeded in the assault, just that she committed the assault.
No, she didn't.
That was Barney Fife.
You obviously haven't seen the video from the front.
From Barney Fifes phone?
WTF is he doing holding a phone AND a gun at the same time?
Another instance that would have got a police cadet, FIRED.
Not sure what you are talking about here. The point I was making was that if you attempt to assault a police officer, you must deal with the consequences.
Of course you aren't sure.
Firing a gun back at police?
That's an attempt to assault a police officer.
Firing a gun with civilians in proximity?
Barney Fife should be fired and charged.
 
Remember their first story: "she wasn't protesting, she was just there to drop off her kid."
Their story changed a half dozen times. Whenever the narrative of the day was destroyed, they just moved on to the next lie.

Now they are relegated to just denying reality. And they all look like complete idiots, and are proud of it. :auiqs.jpg: :cuckoo:
 
Speaking of alternate realities....

WHY DID YOU HAVE REAL BULLETS !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!



This seems so stupid, how could anybody make that assumption? All I can guess is that somebody they trusted told them the agents didn't have real bullets. Love to find out if that comes out of the interviews and statements in the coming days and weeks.
 
In other similar situations juries have been mixed.

SCOTUS is clear. You cannot kill someone simply for fleeing.
She was not simply fleeing. Shw struck a law enforcement officer with a 4,000 pound SUV, while fleeing after a lawful command to get out of a vehicle.

If she had been a J6 protester, the left could understand that.
 
There was another video from the other side which shows that he had to jump out of the way. The camera footage from his vest also indiciates contact. Regardless, she didn't have to hit him for it to be considered an assault on an officer.

As I have said before, I don't believe I would have shot her in this situation, but that doesn't mean it isn't necessarily justified. She was stupid...very stupid.
She was threat to all, agents in the area. All she had to do was stop
 
She was not simply fleeing. Shw struck a law enforcement officer with a 4,000 pound SUV, while fleeing after a lawful command to get out of a vehicle.

If she had been a J6 protester, the left could understand that.
How fast was the vehicle going when he was allegedly hit? What were his injuries?

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Last edited:
15th post
She was not simply fleeing. Shw struck a law enforcement officer with a 4,000 pound SUV, while fleeing after a lawful command to get out of a vehicle.

If she had been a J6 protester, the left could understand that.
She disobeyed the command and was summarily executed on the spot.
 
How fast was the vehicle going when he was allegedly hit? What were his injuries?
Irrelevant. YOU drive your vehicle towards a police officer after refusing to exit it and see what happens
 
Exactly. And that's what the investigation will conclude.
Idiot Stain much? Ignoring the thump, the air knocked out of ICE as Honda plowed into the ICE agent with another ICE at risk of hand torn off in door handle.

You don't drive a car if not clear or under Police orders to get out. You're the kind of ArseJack who backs over puppies or kids?....they should get out of the way.
 
.03 seconds to react. First shot goes through windshield. Officer has no way of predicting she will turn.
Why does the left ignore this obvious fact?
The agent was looking right at her as she frantically turned the steering wheel sharply away from him. He even video recorded it himself.
 
Back
Top Bottom