Perhaps the best test of alternate realities - clear video of the shooting

[g5000]

When he was dragged, he was standing beside the vehicle. It doesn't matter if it was "retarded" or not to stand in front of the car, she still can't hit him. It was no more "retarded" on his part than it was for the lady who hit him to hit the gas with him in front of the car.

The killer was not being dragged when he murdered Renee Good through her driver's side window.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Did she have the legal right to drive off when she was told to stop the car and get out?

"A cop can jump in front of your car, then you must comply or die. ""

Polish those boots.

Good boy.

 

[Mac1958]

The killer was not being dragged when he murdered Renee Good through her driver's side window.

This is why I started the thread. It's a freakin' sociological study.

The clear and close video I provided shows the shooter entering the frame, stops, brings his arms out, two hands holding the gun, not hit by anything, a clear space between his body and the vehicle, and he fires as she goes by, from his right to his left, since she was turning.

Then he holsters his gun, and walks towards the wreck, not injured at all.

This is fascinating, exasperating and a little depressing, all at one time. Two realities.

 

[The Irish Ram]

But she wasn't obstructing... She let ICE vehicles through before this...

She was fleeing... You can't execute someone for fleeing...

The executionier called her a '******* *****'... Well that shows his mainframe... He executed the ******* *****..

She had been obstructing all day. In this instance, she parked her vehicle sideways in the road and was stopping traffic. When the police tell someone to get out of the car, and they flee instead, do the police just say, "Ah shit" and let them go?

What would that agent have done if she had exited her vehicle like they told her to?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is why I started the thread. It's a freakin' sociological study.

The clear and close video I provided shows the shooter entering the frame, stops, brings his arms out, two hands holding the gun, not hit by anything, a clear space between his body and the vehicle, and he fires as she goes by, from his right to his left, since she was turning.

Then he holsters his gun, and walks towards the wreck, not injured at all.

This is fascinating, exasperating and a little depressing, all at one time. Two realities.

He was gearing up to shoot her. He changed hands with his cell phone to get his gun.

 

[buttercup]

déjà vu, a sense that one has experienced a situation before.

More likely, having a deadly encounter in a similar situation, it may have triggered more fear than anger.
Whatever caused his reaction, it was in response to her action. Had she complied with the officers, she would be alive today. Instead, she took it to the next level. And that level includes deadly force.
She isn't the victim, she is the instigator of the event. She wanted them to chase her around the block for shits and giggles. They said no.
In the Democrat libretto, she merely took one for the team...

If his PTSD was that bad, then he shouldn't have been in that job. At least not on the field interacting with people. Give him an office job. He needs mental help. Anger management.

I already went over the other things you said, earlier on the thread, so I don't want to go through the same arguments again and again.

I'm not saying you're doing this, but it seems to me that a lot of folks here are looking at this through an extremely partisan D vs R lens. I don't have to agree with that woman's politics or anything else about her to see that the ICE agents needlessly escalated the situation, acted out of anger, or some pathetic power trip...and in that anger the shooter executed someone in broad daylight.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If his PTSD was that bad, then he shouldn't have been in that job. At least not on the field interacting with people. Give him an office job. He needs mental help. Anger management.

I already went over the other things you said, earlier on the thread, so I don't want to go through the same arguments again and again.

I'm not saying you're doing this, but it seems to me that a lot of folks here are looking at this through an extremely partisan D vs R lens. I don't have to agree with that woman's politics or anything else about her to see that the ICE agents needlessly escalated the situation, acted out of anger, or some pathetic power trip, and that the shooter needlessly executed someone in broad daylight.

His mental illness was not her problem.

 

[OODA_Loop]

"A cop can jump in front of your car, then you must comply or die. ""

Polish those boots.

Good boy.

So you don't wish to discuss the law or don't feel the law applies to you - instead just invective?

Are you a Sovereign Citizen?

 

[SweetTea]

The killer was not being dragged when he murdered Renee Good through her driver's side window.

I know that. I was referring to the previous encounter he had where he was drug. In this case, he was standing in front of the driver's side of the car.

 

[Tyrion234]

He walked up her driver's side window & shot her in the head, twice.

"I'm not mad at you". That's the woman that No.1 ICE goon Noem labeled as a "domestic terrorist". Those were her last words before the ICE goon killed her. Whether you like it or not.

Actions speak louder than words inbred. Whether you like it or not.

 

[Clipper]

Actions speak louder than words inbred. Whether you like it or not.

Can't dispute what I posted, Trump lackey?

All you have is the lies spoonfed to you by the bottom feeders in the W.H. & their flunky's in right wing media such as Fox & Newsmax, Trump poodle.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

The killer was not being dragged when he murdered Renee Good through her driver's side window.

First bullet went through the front windshield not the side

 

[Seymour Flops]

If his PTSD was that bad, then he shouldn't have been in that job. At least not on the field interacting with people. Give him an office job. He needs mental help. Anger management.

An officer with better mental health would have simply allowed himself to be run over?

 

[schmidlap]

She tried to maneuver around the officers and their vehicles. One cop would have none of it and shot her dead.

I don't know why they were after her. Did she hit someone before this video begins? But I do know the the officer was recently drug 50 feet down the street and was hospitalized in another incident.

The Department of Homeland Security’s policy cautions agents to avoid “unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no alternative to using deadly force.” Agents are directed not to fire upon moving vehicles except in instances where deadly force is authorized.

In the video of the slain woman calmly conversing with the masked man, she showed no hostile intent.

No masked men other than her killer drew their weapons as they would have done if they had viewed her as a threat.

The video shows that the masked shooter deliberately blocked her vehicle, and shot her to death as she was turning to the right to get around him.

The masked killer, by suddenly shooting her without warning, endangered others - including the other masked men.

This tragic incident must be thoroughly investigated by local law enforcement authorities.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you don't wish to discuss the law or don't feel the law applies to you - instead just invective?

Are you a Sovereign Citizen?

Yep, I do not want to split the hairs. The results are what they are.

Polish those boots.

Good boy.

 

[schmidlap]

An officer with better mental health would have simply allowed himself to be run over?

...or follow Homeland Security's policy that he not unreasonably place himself in a position in which there is no alternative to using deadly force. Or stop impeding her effort to turn to the right to avoid him. Or conform to all the other agents' behavior of not drawing their weapons as she tried to drive away.

 

[schmidlap]

First bullet went through the front windshield not the side

View attachment 1204947

Trump's being a convicted felon is irrelevant to matter of this unarmed citizen being shot to death by a masked man.

Please do not indulge yourself with partisan diversions.

 

[task0778]

This is why I started the thread. It's a freakin' sociological study.

The clear and close video I provided shows the shooter entering the frame, stops, brings his arms out, two hands holding the gun, not hit by anything, a clear space between his body and the vehicle, and he fires as she goes by, from his right to his left, since she was turning.

Then he holsters his gun, and walks towards the wreck, not injured at all.

This is fascinating, exasperating and a little depressing, all at one time. Two realities.

Look at this video about 8 seconds in, it sure looks to me like he got hit and had some reason to believe the driver could be using her car as a weapon to injure him. Whether he was actually injured or not is irrelevant.

 

[Tyrion234]

Can't dispute what I posted, Trump lackey?

All you have is the lies spoonfed to you by the bottom feeders in the W.H. & their flunky's in right wing media such as Fox & Newsmax, Trump poodle.

Why would I dispute what the retards last words were? Do you think that proves some sort of point that allows her to run her car into a LEO after being told to get out of the car? Do you not understand the concept that she was killed because of HER ACTIONS not because she said she wasn’t mad at him? What a ******* moron you truly are

 

[Seymour Flops]

...or follow Homeland Security's policy that he not unreasonably place himself in a position in which there is no alternative to using deadly force.

There was nothing unreasonable about him being in front of the vehicle at the moment that she was ordered to step out of it. What was unreasonable was for her to put it in drive and floor it after being ordered to step out of the vehicle.

She FAFO'd. Your media does you a disservice by making her a hero for doing something that dumb.

Or stop impeding her effort to turn to the right to avoid him.

Just by being there, he was impeding her? She could have avoided him easily by not putting it into drive in the first place. She would have preferred not to hit him but she made the choice that not hitting him was not as important as obeying her wife's command to "drive baby drive.

BTW, do you agree that the wife should be arrested and charged?

Yes or no, then explain all you like.

Or conform to all the other agents' behavior of not drawing their weapons as she tried to drive away.

She was not right in front of them, trying to run her over. He had a clear shot, that he had to take to save his own life, and the lives of whoever else she would have plowed into.

I know you don't believe any of your own nonsense.