Pepe Le Pew banned

In which cartoon did he rape someone? I must have missed it
Think about it. Pepe in every cartoon did exactly what Cuomo was accused of.

And they want to throw Cuomo out of office for it.

Think.
No, the political and professional context of REAL harassment is shame based, hidden and threatening. Cuomo preyed on people alone, so if complaints are made, this becomes a manipulated situation of blaming the victim.

In the cartoon situation, the joke is that the cat gets painted with a white stripe and is mistaken for a skunk.
This isn't glamourizing "rape or harassment". The joke is about mistaking a cat for a skunk. If there is any cultural caricature, it is making fun of the French.

Even that is clearly a comical exaggeration,
but is Good Natured. Not mean spirited or abusive.

I guess we need to form a Cultural Council to review complaints and resolve conflicts. So we can educate the public on the difference between bullying and abusive taunting, versus good natured humor without ill intent.
 
Normalize rape culture. :rolleyes:

Rape is not about sex or love or romance. Its about CONTROL. These people are idiots.
Well what do you call it when a male is oblivious to the fact that his feelings are not being reciprocated and/or are unwanted? It's one thing if he's merely stating how he feels but even though it's a cartoon, it's obvious the only thing that is important is what HE wants even though it's CLEARLY written on her face and body language how she feels yet he's all over her attempting to romance her.
How pussywhipped can you get?
 
Normalize rape culture. :rolleyes:

Rape is not about sex or love or romance. Its about CONTROL. These people are idiots.
Well what do you call it when a male is oblivious to the fact that his feelings are not being reciprocated and/or are unwanted? It's one thing if he's merely stating how he feels but even though it's a cartoon, it's obvious the only thing that is important is what HE wants even though it's CLEARLY written on her face and body language how she feels yet he's all over her attempting to romance her.
How pussywhipped can you get?
I slapped her on ignore, but peeked. So I will answer her question by "circling around" to it :biggrin: :

I call it a guy that wants her, woos her, does all he can to have her see him instead of ignoring him. Kinda like what MrG did with me. Flowers. Dinner. Attempts to kiss me too soon. Coming in to where I worked just to tell me he really really REALLY liked me. A LOT. My friends kept saying they ran into him at the market or whatever and they always laughed because he always said to them " I really like her. A LOT" with emphasis on A LOT. I, on the other hand, was not interested. Not my type. So he pierced his ear thinking I wanted a bad boy (I was lightly dating a biker at the time). Eventually, though...I began to SEE him. Who he was.

Dad wooed/courted my mother for 1 year. She finally SAW him too. They married, had me and my older sister, and she was devastated when he died. We kept having to go to the cemetary to get her off his grave, where she laid sobbing.

If you see Pepe and Penelope as some form of rape issue..you are as sick in the head as your fellow brethen.

If you are so afraid that a cartoon skunk will think you are a cat and try to rape you.....stay in your basement.

Now..no more peeking. Stay on iggie. I have no time for idiots.
 
Last edited:
Normalize rape culture. :rolleyes:

Rape is not about sex or love or romance. Its about CONTROL. These people are idiots.
Well what do you call it when a male is oblivious to the fact that his feelings are not being reciprocated and/or are unwanted? It's one thing if he's merely stating how he feels but even though it's a cartoon, it's obvious the only thing that is important is what HE wants even though it's CLEARLY written on her face and body language how she feels yet he's all over her attempting to romance her.
How pussywhipped can you get?
Wrong gender
 
Normalize rape culture. :rolleyes:

Rape is not about sex or love or romance. Its about CONTROL. These people are idiots.
Well what do you call it when a male is oblivious to the fact that his feelings are not being reciprocated and/or are unwanted? It's one thing if he's merely stating how he feels but even though it's a cartoon, it's obvious the only thing that is important is what HE wants even though it's CLEARLY written on her face and body language how she feels yet he's all over her attempting to romance her.
How pussywhipped can you get?
Wrong gender
Since there seem to be 36 of them, I guess it was a longshot. Still, pussywhipped seems the most appropriate regardless.
 
Normalize rape culture. :rolleyes:

Rape is not about sex or love or romance. Its about CONTROL. These people are idiots.
Well what do you call it when a male is oblivious to the fact that his feelings are not being reciprocated and/or are unwanted? It's one thing if he's merely stating how he feels but even though it's a cartoon, it's obvious the only thing that is important is what HE wants even though it's CLEARLY written on her face and body language how she feels yet he's all over her attempting to romance her.
How pussywhipped can you get?
Wrong gender
Since there seem to be 36 of them, I guess it was a longshot. Still, pussywhipped seems the most appropriate regardless.
You're still wrong.
 
Normalize rape culture. :rolleyes:

Rape is not about sex or love or romance. Its about CONTROL. These people are idiots.
Well what do you call it when a male is oblivious to the fact that his feelings are not being reciprocated and/or are unwanted? It's one thing if he's merely stating how he feels but even though it's a cartoon, it's obvious the only thing that is important is what HE wants even though it's CLEARLY written on her face and body language how she feels yet he's all over her attempting to romance her.
How pussywhipped can you get?
I slapped her on ignore, but peeked. So I will answer her question by "circling around" to it :biggrin: :

I call it a guy that wants her, woos her, does all he can to have her see him instead of ignoring him. Kinda like what MrG did with me. Flowers. Dinner. Attempts to kiss me too soon. Coming in to where I worked just to tell me he really really REALLY liked me. A LOT. My friends kept saying they ran into him at the market or whatever and they always laughed because he always said to them " I really like her. A LOT" with emphasis on A LOT. I, on the other hand, was not interested. Not my type. So he pierced his ear thinking I wanted a bad boy (I was lightly dating a biker at the time). Eventually, though...I began to SEE him. Who he was.

Dad wooed/courted my mother for 1 year. She finally SAW him too. They married, had me and my older sister, and she was devastated when he died. We kept having to go to the cemetary to get her off his grave, where she laid sobbing.

If you see Pepe and Penelope as some form of rape issue..you are as sick in the head as your fellow brethen.

If you are so afraid that a cartoon skunk will think you are a cat and try to rape you.....stay in your basement.

Now..no more peeking. Stay on iggie. I have no time for idiots.
This is an ignorant post.
 
I'm expecting the road runner to be canceled for animal cruelty.
Well, Wile E Coyote went on to join ISIS to train them in the use of roadside bombs from ACME incorporated.
images (1).jpeg
 
I guess you missed Trump forceably kissing women, grabbing them by the ______, and of course adultery with porn stars.
If you believe that you are moron-----Trump wasn't talking about forcing anyone---he has always had plenty of willing partners...
Trump saying "they let you because you're a celebrity" actually isn't consent, but one of power and status.

No different than somebodies boss, saying an employee let him, because he was the boss.
Oh brother you are delusional..............lots and lots of women want to be with a celebrity. This is their choice, not rape and not sexual assault. Some do it for attention, most do it for money------either way--what two consenting adults do with their sex life as long as it doesn't involve an innocent victim such as kids or animals is no one else's concern. If the woman or guy doesn't want to be with the celebrity, she has the right to say no---some of us actually do tell billionaires to go fuck themselves. I had billionaire Bob stupid Stupak tossed out of the HORSESHOE for not being able to take no for answer way back in my youth. He was shocked that I a mere lowly casino worker with my tiny earnings would tell him to go away and even more shocked that the Binions and my favorite security guard would back me up. He wasn't the only super rich and/or celebrity that I told to drop dead btw---as I said it was always a choice. I didn't date celebrities or the rich by choice--I didn't want to be their plaything. Certainly many of my co-workers dated the celebrities- I always considered them more like whores but that again is their choice.
 
You're still wrong.
A philosophical question:

If a man (a real one) is in the forest alone and says something that none of the other 35 genders can hear, is he still wrong?
The multiple gender identities are internal, and more like religious denominations that can branch out and be as diverse and unique as each individual personality. The external biological genders fall into 6 genetic karyotypes that favor either XX or XY, with very few being true hermaphrodites of both male and female traits evenly. Most are biased toward male dominant or female dominant, and can be classed GENETICALLY as such for legal and govt purposes of tracking statistics for health and economic records. While the INTERNAL distinctions, like other faith based personal affiliations and preferences, remain NONE of the Govt business to regulate, establish or prohibit.
The most Govt might do is distinguish between the different categories of beliefs and creeds, in order to equally protect all people from discrimination, disparagement or harassment REGARDLESS of "religious or political beliefs, spiritual or sexual beliefs, affiliation or creed" (instead of govt abused to establish or protect one bias in beliefs over others as with LGBT vs Christian beliefs).

This goes both ways. If you cannot discriminate against people for being transgender or pro-LGBT, you also cannot discriminate against people by declaring them "racist" or "pro-Trump" or "anti-gay" and "transphobic", but must follow DUE PROCESS to prove a person's ACTIONS violated rights and protections or words threatened death as a felony or violent harm as harassment and abuse.

This nonsense of only protecting one set of beliefs as a protected govt class "while punishing another set of beliefs" is going too far and is causing its own backlash by abusing govt to establish biases faith based beliefs regarding gender identity which is internal policy outside govt jurisdiction.

Screenshot_20210307-111458_Chrome.jpg
 
You're still wrong.
A philosophical question:

If a man (a real one) is in the forest alone and says something that none of the other 35 genders can hear, is he still wrong?
The multiple gender identities are internal, and more like religious denominations that can branch out and be as diverse and unique as each individual personality. The external biological genders fall into 6 genetic karyotypes that favor either XX or XY, with very few being true hermaphrodites of both male and female traits evenly. Most are biased toward male dominant or female dominant, and can be classed GENETICALLY as such for legal and govt purposes of tracking statistics for health and economic records. While the INTERNAL distinctions, like other faith based personal affiliations and preferences, remain NONE of the Govt business to regulate, establish or prohibit.
The most Govt might do is distinguish between the different categories of beliefs and creeds, in order to equally protect all people from discrimination, disparagement or harassment REGARDLESS of "religious or political beliefs, spiritual or sexual beliefs, affiliation or creed" (instead of govt abused to establish or protect one bias in beliefs over others as with LGBT vs Christian beliefs).

This goes both ways. If you cannot discriminate against people for being transgender or pro-LGBT, you also cannot discriminate against people by declaring them "racist" or "pro-Trump" or "anti-gay" and "transphobic", but must follow DUE PROCESS to prove a person's ACTIONS violated rights and protections or words threatened death as a felony or violent harm as harassment and abuse.

This nonsense of only protecting one set of beliefs as a protected govt class "while punishing another set of beliefs" is going too far and is causing its own backlash by abusing govt to establish biases faith based beliefs regarding gender identity which is internal policy outside govt jurisdiction.

View attachment 465115
I'll make it easier for everyone. Just look at your crotch.
 
Think about it. Pepe in every cartoon did exactly what Cuomo was accused of.

And they want to throw Cuomo out of office for it.

Think.
Pepe Le Pew is not the governor of the state of New York!
If your comment was not satire, which it seems like
it is, then it's you who need to think about it. Le Pew is a cartoon figure unlike Cuomo
who is a menacing bully that acts like a cartoon character.

Pepe Le Pew is also not responsible for murdering thousands of elderly nursing home residents.
Think about that!
 
Last edited:


In the wake of Dr. Seuss Enterprises' announcement that six old books would no longer be printed, culture critics are putting fresh attention on other aspects of children's media — including The Looney Tunes' Pepé Le Pew. On Wednesday, Charles M. Blow wrote an opinion column for The New York Times saying, among other things, that Pepé "normalized rape culture."


Blow pointed to the problematic features of children's media as well, recalling even more obscure old characters like Speedy Gonzales and Mammy Two Shoes. However, the condemnation of Pepé Le Pew seemed to hit some readers especially hard.




So....now some of our favorite cartoons are a no no. When is this insanity going to stop? Blow can blow me.


If that cartoon epitomizes rape culture, then every man's a rapist.

Even those light-in-the-loafers snowflake mama's boys.
 

Forum List

Back
Top