If one wants to purchase NON NECESSARY ITEMS, PAY FOR THEM YOURSELF.
Welfare should be for staple food products. Milk, bread, meat, vegetables, etc.
Not Kit Kat bars and Dr Pepper.
I love the new restrictions.
It is time to end the welfare program. Since FREE money is printed to give to these lazy slobs, then there is no appreciation for that money, while inflating the dollars, because their is nothing to back those extra dollars.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8f8e...GFyK2lzK2ErY29udHJhY3QmZm9ybT1DU0JSQU5E&ntb=1
Walter E. Williams on the Dollar as a Contract
Walter E. Williams, a prominent classical liberal economist and professor at George Mason University, often emphasized the importance of understanding money as a
contractual agreement between parties. In his writings and public commentary, Williams argued that the dollar — whether U.S. currency or other forms of money — is not a natural or inherent value, but rather a
socially agreed-upon medium of exchange.
Williams’ view aligns with the
free-market, libertarian perspective that money is a product of voluntary agreement among individuals and institutions. He stressed that the value of money is derived from the trust and mutual consent of those who use it, not from any intrinsic property of the paper or metal it represents. This means that if the terms of that contract are violated — for example, through inflation, debasement, or government overreach — the dollar loses its credibility and purchasing power.
In his broader economic philosophy, Williams often warned against government overreach in monetary policy, noting that when the state intervenes in the creation or regulation of money, it risks undermining the private, voluntary nature of the contract. He believed that
sound money — money whose value is tied to real goods and services rather than government decree — is essential for preserving individual liberty and economic freedom
blog.acton.org.
Williams’ position on the dollar as a contract reflects his commitment to
limited government, free markets, and the sovereignty of the individual. He saw the dollar as a tool that should be protected from arbitrary manipulation, because its legitimacy depends on the mutual agreement of its users. This perspective is consistent with his advocacy for
sound money principles and his skepticism toward central bank control over currency
blog.acton.org.
In short, for Walter E. Williams, the dollar is a
social contract — a promise backed by trust, and its integrity depends on respecting the voluntary agreements that underpin it.
Wikipedia