Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Except you’re wrong, and the fact that you verbally assault anyone with a different opinion shows you are not interested in a debate .- just being nasty to those who aren’t submitting to the liberal agenda.I never claimed to be tolerant or polite. I only claim to be right. If you can't take the heat stay the hell out of the kitchen.
Huh? Parents earning $100,000, $125,000, even $150,000 are getting this money. That bit about “the poor children” is more liberal crappola.$1400 of it was refundable under Trump, so your details are still off.
I know. It’s terrible. Decreasing child poverty is just so wrong.
Under Trump’s law the credit went to families earning up to $400,000 which is totally bonkers.Huh? Parents earning $100,000, $125,000, even $150,000 are getting this money. That bit about “the poor children” is more liberal crappola.
And what about the inflation that results from weakening the value of the dollar? Increasing elderly poverty is OK by liberals.
Any family with an income of around $150,000 or less! I will get you the exact income cutoff and be back…..Who is eligible for those payments?
You’re making the argument that the inflation that results, and throws more elderly into poverty, is OK. That is more than a little scary.Under Trump’s law the credit went to families earning up to $400,000 which is totally bonkers.
But you were talking about the refundable portion, which doesn’t apply to people who have significant income.
I mean, if a lot fewer kids in poverty means I have to pay 4% more, so be it. You’re making an argument that we need people in poverty and it’s a little scary.
Thanks. Cut me off a piece of that action!Any family with an income of around $150,000 or less! I will get you the exact income cutoff and be back…..
Why would it throw more elderly into poverty? SS is inflation adjusted.You’re making the argument that the inflation that results, and throws more elderly into poverty, is OK. That is more than a little scary.
And the winner of the 2021 ignore the obvious award goes to....It's getting tiring hearing the whining going on by the msm that there's a labor shortage. Unemployment pay is gone now. People are working. This is a bunch of baloney.
Yikes! I just checked it out, and it’s even crazier than I thought. Families earning up to $150,000 get the full amount, but families earning up to $400,000 (!) can get a portion as the benefit phases out.Thanks. Cut me off a piece of that action!
Are you kidding. SS is only a portion of the income. It offsets inflation somewhat, but overall, elders are losing purchasing power.Why would it throw more elderly into poverty? SS is inflation adjusted.
It's pretty easy to spot the liberals in the workforce.Sure they are. But have you noticed the lack of quality people who are working? It's almost like every unqualified retard in the country ran out of unemployment benefits and were forced to get a job.
$1,800/mo raised by $76 is crap...Why would it throw more elderly into poverty? SS is inflation adjusted.
Social security is what keeps them out of poverty.Are you kidding. SS is only a portion of the income. It offsets inflation somewhat, but overall, elders are losing purchasing power.
5% increase seems pretty appropriate to me.$1,800/mo raised by $76 is crap...
Thats what I get around this area. (Other areas get a larger check)
Its nowhere near enough to live on. It protects nothing and "cost of living" increases are another joke... especially when retirees mostly buy food, energy, and medical care.
And if I had ever had a chance to avoid SS and have any other retirement program I would get a raise in pay at retirement.Social security is what keeps them out of poverty.
The rest of their income is derived from investments. Market is up like 25% in the last 2 years.
So true. I was at a hotel last week, and half the places were closed because they couldn’t get staff. Couldn’t get a decent meal - no workers. Couldn‘t get a fresh towel - shortage of maids. No room service - not enough staff.And the winner of the 2021 ignore the obvious award goes to....
Pensions are indeed nice deals if you can get them but as we’ve seen they’re nearly extinct, too expensive to the bottom line for corporate America.And if I had ever had a chance to avoid SS and have any other retirement program I would get a raise in pay at retirement.
Railroad retirement and Church Pastor's retirement are examples of just that.
Those guys are much better off financially when they retire than working. Unlike the rest of the citizens who have to have a primary retirement portfolio in addition to SS.
The whole program is a joke!5% increase seems pretty appropriate to me.
Its my own money! They aren't paid by the company except for a pittance of matching funds.... unlike SS which requires an equal amount.Pensions are indeed nice deals if you can get them but as we’ve seen they’re nearly extinct, too expensive to the bottom line for corporate America.
Don’t forget - some of that windfall will have to pay increased Medicare. Maybe you’ll end up with $60 more a month, which is likely taxable, so figure $50 more a month.$1,800/mo raised by $76 is crap...
Thats what I get around this area. (Other areas get a larger check)
Its nowhere near enough to live on. It protects nothing and "cost of living" increases are another joke... especially when retirees mostly buy food, energy, and medical care.
