Pelosi, unconstitutional impeachment

[Leo123]

Susan McDougall was jailed for 18 months for contempt of Congress for refusing to testify in the Whitewater investigation. It wasn’t even an impeachment yet. The House can and should start arresting people.

Uh, that wasn't an impeachment.

Exactly. That didn’t even rise to the level of an impeachment investigation. It was just a regular old Congressional subpoena. And they jailed her for 18 months.

you should really think before you post.

It was a criminal investigation with different legal criteria. Saying it did not 'rise to the level' of an impeachment is not only wrong and misleading but disingenuous because there is no comparison at all.

 

[Zorro!]

Looks Like The Old Girl Is Cracking Up:


BOOM! Trump Trolls Unhinged “Nervous Nancy” Pelosi After her Public Meltdown in Oval Office!

Pelosi’s behavior was “unbecoming” according to Rep. McCarthy.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) threw a tantrum and stormed out of the meeting, according to House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).

 

[Nosmo King]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Have you ever read the constitution, or are you being "educated" by Fox, Limbaugh and Breitbart?

Funny the things you will find in that pesky constitution. Stuff like how impeachment actually works.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It was a criminal investigation with different legal criteria.

Right, in that the President cannot be charged with a crime. But, as we all know, the impeachment proceedings will be, among other things, a criminal investigation.

 

[Leo123]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Have you ever read the constitution, or are you being "educated" by Fox, Limbaugh and Breitbart?

Funny the things you will find in that pesky constitution. Stuff like how impeachment actually works.

Yes I have read the Constitution and, unlike you, I understand it. Would you like to be accused and not be able to call witnesses or get discovery from the prosecutor? That is what Nancy-pants is doing to Trump and it is unconstitutional. The Constitution (as I have already posted many times) presumes a bipartisan vote and to have witnesses testify in public, not behind closed doors like this Democrat clown show.

 

[Nosmo King]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Have you ever read the constitution, or are you being "educated" by Fox, Limbaugh and Breitbart?

Funny the things you will find in that pesky constitution. Stuff like how impeachment actually works.

Yes I have read the Constitution and, unlike you, I understand it. Would you like to be accused and not be able to call witnesses or get discovery from the prosecutor? That is what Nancy-pants is doing to Trump and it is unconstitutional. The Constitution (as I have already posted many times) presumes a bipartisan vote and to have witnesses testify in public, not behind closed doors like this Democrat clown show.

Well...

The House has sole power of impeachment.

Impeachment is analogous of indictment.

No defendant is represented by counsel during grand jury procedures. Grand juries hand down indictments.

Was it the constitution of the United States you purportedly read and understood?

 

[Leo123]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Have you ever read the constitution, or are you being "educated" by Fox, Limbaugh and Breitbart?

Funny the things you will find in that pesky constitution. Stuff like how impeachment actually works.

Yes I have read the Constitution and, unlike you, I understand it. Would you like to be accused and not be able to call witnesses or get discovery from the prosecutor? That is what Nancy-pants is doing to Trump and it is unconstitutional. The Constitution (as I have already posted many times) presumes a bipartisan vote and to have witnesses testify in public, not behind closed doors like this Democrat clown show.

Well...

The House has sole power of impeachment.

Impeachment is analogous of indictment.

No defendant is represented by counsel during grand jury procedures. Grand juries hand down indictments.

Was it the constitution of the United States you purportedly read and understood?

The House is not impeaching Trump, Nancy-pants and the Democrat Party is doing it and behind closed doors to boot!!. She needs a vote but knows she can't get it so she has testimony behind closed doors so they can spin the leaks. For God's sake WAKE UP!

 

[Nosmo King]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Have you ever read the constitution, or are you being "educated" by Fox, Limbaugh and Breitbart?

Funny the things you will find in that pesky constitution. Stuff like how impeachment actually works.

Yes I have read the Constitution and, unlike you, I understand it. Would you like to be accused and not be able to call witnesses or get discovery from the prosecutor? That is what Nancy-pants is doing to Trump and it is unconstitutional. The Constitution (as I have already posted many times) presumes a bipartisan vote and to have witnesses testify in public, not behind closed doors like this Democrat clown show.

Well...

The House has sole power of impeachment.

Impeachment is analogous of indictment.

No defendant is represented by counsel during grand jury procedures. Grand juries hand down indictments.

Was it the constitution of the United States you purportedly read and understood?

The House is not impeaching Trump, Nancy-pants and the Democrat Party is doing it and behind closed doors to boot!!. She needs a vote but knows she can't get it so she has testimony behind closed doors so they can spin the leaks. For God's sake WAKE UP!

Hearing depositions as well as many impeachment proceedings are held behind closed doors in order to prevent witnesses from co-ordinarily testimony. Speaker Pelosi does not have to hold a vote to open impeachment inquiries. The constitution and the House rules do not specify a full House vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry.

Both Democrat and Republican members serve on the House Intelligence committee. The Republicans are masters of spinning leaks. Let them do the dirty work.

This is not news. These are the procedures. Why haven't you heard of them? Didn't they cover this on Fox?

 

[Leo123]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Have you ever read the constitution, or are you being "educated" by Fox, Limbaugh and Breitbart?

Funny the things you will find in that pesky constitution. Stuff like how impeachment actually works.

Yes I have read the Constitution and, unlike you, I understand it. Would you like to be accused and not be able to call witnesses or get discovery from the prosecutor? That is what Nancy-pants is doing to Trump and it is unconstitutional. The Constitution (as I have already posted many times) presumes a bipartisan vote and to have witnesses testify in public, not behind closed doors like this Democrat clown show.

Well...

The House has sole power of impeachment.

Impeachment is analogous of indictment.

No defendant is represented by counsel during grand jury procedures. Grand juries hand down indictments.

Was it the constitution of the United States you purportedly read and understood?

The House is not impeaching Trump, Nancy-pants and the Democrat Party is doing it and behind closed doors to boot!!. She needs a vote but knows she can't get it so she has testimony behind closed doors so they can spin the leaks. For God's sake WAKE UP!

Hearing depositions as well as many impeachment proceedings are held behind closed doors in order to prevent witnesses from co-ordinarily testimony. Speaker Pelosi does not have to hold a vote to open impeachment inquiries. The constitution and the House rules do not specify a full House vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry.

Both Democrat and Republican members serve on the House Intelligence committee. The Republicans are masters of spinning leaks. Let them do the dirty work.

This is not news. These are the procedures. Why haven't you heard of them? Didn't they cover this on Fox?

Yes, it's Pelosi's impeachment. And stop with your 'do not specify a full House vote' without a bipartisan agreement (VOTE) the impeachment is nothing but a personal vendetta ...a soft coup if you will. If you really believe Trump needs to be impeached because of the transcript President Trump declassified, please point to your proof. Read the transcript, publish the hard evidence that rises to the level of impeachment. Hint: Your OPINION of what he said does not count just as the 'whistleblower' and lying Schiff's OPINIONS do not count.

P.S. "co-ordinarily" is a meaningless term. Like this impeachment....wholly meaningless except for propaganda purposes and a last-ditch effort to save the Democrat party from its ultimate demise in 2020.

 

[Nosmo King]

Have you ever read the constitution, or are you being "educated" by Fox, Limbaugh and Breitbart?

Funny the things you will find in that pesky constitution. Stuff like how impeachment actually works.

Yes I have read the Constitution and, unlike you, I understand it. Would you like to be accused and not be able to call witnesses or get discovery from the prosecutor? That is what Nancy-pants is doing to Trump and it is unconstitutional. The Constitution (as I have already posted many times) presumes a bipartisan vote and to have witnesses testify in public, not behind closed doors like this Democrat clown show.

Well...

The House has sole power of impeachment.

Impeachment is analogous of indictment.

No defendant is represented by counsel during grand jury procedures. Grand juries hand down indictments.

Was it the constitution of the United States you purportedly read and understood?

The House is not impeaching Trump, Nancy-pants and the Democrat Party is doing it and behind closed doors to boot!!. She needs a vote but knows she can't get it so she has testimony behind closed doors so they can spin the leaks. For God's sake WAKE UP!

Hearing depositions as well as many impeachment proceedings are held behind closed doors in order to prevent witnesses from co-ordinarily testimony. Speaker Pelosi does not have to hold a vote to open impeachment inquiries. The constitution and the House rules do not specify a full House vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry.

Both Democrat and Republican members serve on the House Intelligence committee. The Republicans are masters of spinning leaks. Let them do the dirty work.

This is not news. These are the procedures. Why haven't you heard of them? Didn't they cover this on Fox?

Yes, it's Pelosi's impeachment. And stop with your 'do not specify a full House vote' without a bipartisan agreement (VOTE) the impeachment is nothing but a personal vendetta ...a soft coup if you will. If you really believe Trump needs to be impeached because of the transcript President Trump declassified, please point to your proof. Read the transcript, publish the hard evidence that rises to the level of impeachment. Hint: Your OPINION of what he said does not count just as the 'whistleblower' and lying Schiff's OPINIONS do not count.

P.S. "co-ordinarily" is a meaningless term. Like this impeachment....wholly meaningless except for propaganda purposes and a last-ditch effort to save the Democrat party from its ultimate demise in 2020.

An impeachment inquiry is used to gather evidence. Without an inquiry, how can evidence be discovered?

Once the evidence is amassed, articles of impeachment will be drafted and submitted to the full House for a vote. If the articles are approved in the House, Teump is impeached.

Then the Senate holds a trial, presided by Chief Justice Roberts. Trump will be defended by legal counsel. If convicted, Teump will be forced from office.

And all that is spelled out in that pesky constitution thingy you allegedly read and understand.

 

[Leo123]

Yes I have read the Constitution and, unlike you, I understand it. Would you like to be accused and not be able to call witnesses or get discovery from the prosecutor? That is what Nancy-pants is doing to Trump and it is unconstitutional. The Constitution (as I have already posted many times) presumes a bipartisan vote and to have witnesses testify in public, not behind closed doors like this Democrat clown show.

Well...

The House has sole power of impeachment.

Impeachment is analogous of indictment.

No defendant is represented by counsel during grand jury procedures. Grand juries hand down indictments.

Was it the constitution of the United States you purportedly read and understood?

The House is not impeaching Trump, Nancy-pants and the Democrat Party is doing it and behind closed doors to boot!!. She needs a vote but knows she can't get it so she has testimony behind closed doors so they can spin the leaks. For God's sake WAKE UP!

Hearing depositions as well as many impeachment proceedings are held behind closed doors in order to prevent witnesses from co-ordinarily testimony. Speaker Pelosi does not have to hold a vote to open impeachment inquiries. The constitution and the House rules do not specify a full House vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry.

Both Democrat and Republican members serve on the House Intelligence committee. The Republicans are masters of spinning leaks. Let them do the dirty work.

This is not news. These are the procedures. Why haven't you heard of them? Didn't they cover this on Fox?

Yes, it's Pelosi's impeachment. And stop with your 'do not specify a full House vote' without a bipartisan agreement (VOTE) the impeachment is nothing but a personal vendetta ...a soft coup if you will. If you really believe Trump needs to be impeached because of the transcript President Trump declassified, please point to your proof. Read the transcript, publish the hard evidence that rises to the level of impeachment. Hint: Your OPINION of what he said does not count just as the 'whistleblower' and lying Schiff's OPINIONS do not count.

P.S. "co-ordinarily" is a meaningless term. Like this impeachment....wholly meaningless except for propaganda purposes and a last-ditch effort to save the Democrat party from its ultimate demise in 2020.

An impeachment inquiry is used to gather evidence. Without an inquiry, how can evidence be discovered?

Once the evidence is amassed, articles of impeachment will be drafted and submitted to the full House for a vote. If the articles are approved in the House, Teump is impeached.

Then the Senate holds a trial, presided by Chief Justice Roberts. Trump will be defended by legal counsel. If convicted, Teump will be forced from office.

And all that is spelled out in that pesky constitution thingy you allegedly read and understand.

Oh stop it. Pelosi and the Democrats are the ONLY ones that can gather discovery in their prosecution of Trump? Honestly how dumb can some folks be? How would YOU like a prosecutor to disallow YOUR lawyer discovery and disallowing YOU calling witnesses? This is nothing but a Democrat, propaganda clown show and you are riding in the clown car.

 

[Nosmo King]

Well...

The House has sole power of impeachment.

Impeachment is analogous of indictment.

No defendant is represented by counsel during grand jury procedures. Grand juries hand down indictments.

Was it the constitution of the United States you purportedly read and understood?

The House is not impeaching Trump, Nancy-pants and the Democrat Party is doing it and behind closed doors to boot!!. She needs a vote but knows she can't get it so she has testimony behind closed doors so they can spin the leaks. For God's sake WAKE UP!

Hearing depositions as well as many impeachment proceedings are held behind closed doors in order to prevent witnesses from co-ordinarily testimony. Speaker Pelosi does not have to hold a vote to open impeachment inquiries. The constitution and the House rules do not specify a full House vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry.

Both Democrat and Republican members serve on the House Intelligence committee. The Republicans are masters of spinning leaks. Let them do the dirty work.

This is not news. These are the procedures. Why haven't you heard of them? Didn't they cover this on Fox?

Yes, it's Pelosi's impeachment. And stop with your 'do not specify a full House vote' without a bipartisan agreement (VOTE) the impeachment is nothing but a personal vendetta ...a soft coup if you will. If you really believe Trump needs to be impeached because of the transcript President Trump declassified, please point to your proof. Read the transcript, publish the hard evidence that rises to the level of impeachment. Hint: Your OPINION of what he said does not count just as the 'whistleblower' and lying Schiff's OPINIONS do not count.

P.S. "co-ordinarily" is a meaningless term. Like this impeachment....wholly meaningless except for propaganda purposes and a last-ditch effort to save the Democrat party from its ultimate demise in 2020.

An impeachment inquiry is used to gather evidence. Without an inquiry, how can evidence be discovered?

Once the evidence is amassed, articles of impeachment will be drafted and submitted to the full House for a vote. If the articles are approved in the House, Teump is impeached.

Then the Senate holds a trial, presided by Chief Justice Roberts. Trump will be defended by legal counsel. If convicted, Teump will be forced from office.

And all that is spelled out in that pesky constitution thingy you allegedly read and understand.

Oh stop it. Pelosi and the Democrats are the ONLY ones that can gather discovery in their prosecution of Trump? Honestly how dumb can some folks be? How would YOU like a prosecutor to disallow YOUR lawyer discovery and disallowing YOU calling witnesses? This is nothing but a Democrat, propaganda clown show and you are riding in the clown car.

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

 

[Leo123]

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

In the past the discovery phase and the questioning of witnesses took place in public, not behind closed doors. This is bullshit and, unless you are a total Democrat tool, you know it's nothing but a clown show of propaganda. Let Pelosi call a vote.....Get this impeachment underway....But she won't because....And I repeat....There is no evidence. I already asked you guys to publish the now declassified transcript and point to the exact words that you feel support impeachment of a duly elected President. You didn't and you won't and Pelosi is playing games.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

Rump gets his day in court when it goes to the Senate for Senate Hearings. And that is just the way it is. Live with it.

That is not the way the last two inquiries were run. Nasty Pelousy is providing cover for those who cannot vote for impeachment lest they be destroyed in the next election.

 

[Nosmo King]

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

In the past the discovery phase and the questioning of witnesses took place in public, not behind closed doors. This is bullshit and, unless you are a total Democrat tool, you know it's nothing but a clown show of propaganda. Let Pelosi call a vote.....Get this impeachment underway....But she won't because....And I repeat....There is no evidence. I already asked you guys to publish the now declassified transcript and point to the exact words that you feel support impeachment of a duly elected President. You didn't and you won't and Pelosi is playing games.

Depositions and testimony continue. Evidence is being gathered. Articles of impeachment will be drafted and voted on. The House will discuss the evidence and vote for impeachment. The Articles of impeachment will be made public. Witnesses in the Senate trial will be called. Defense will be proffered.

Nothing being done is unconstitutional, except, of course, the stonewalling by the White House. Subpoenas hold the penalty of law and ignoring such legal means constituents obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And since it hasn't progress that far yet, now what? Are you going to hide under your bed covers and cry yourself to sleep? Will it keep you up all night in trembles? What happens if it doesn't get that far to go to a full vote?

And Joe Biden has ZERO input in the impeachment procedings in the House. If you tell a lie enough times does it make it the truth? Nope, it's still a lie.

Then it dies. Don't cry now Daryl

Then let it die. We all would be grateful.

I agree, let the impeachment die. It is useless.

If there is no proof of wrong doing found, it will be. It's a little bit early for that though.

Democrats do not get to investigate, investigate, and then investigate some more hoping to find something they can pin on Trump. That's called a fishing expedition, and it happens to be illegal under our Constitution.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And since it hasn't progress that far yet, now what? Are you going to hide under your bed covers and cry yourself to sleep? Will it keep you up all night in trembles? What happens if it doesn't get that far to go to a full vote?

And Joe Biden has ZERO input in the impeachment procedings in the House. If you tell a lie enough times does it make it the truth? Nope, it's still a lie.

Then it dies. Don't cry now Daryl

Then let it die. We all would be grateful.

I agree, let the impeachment die. It is useless.

nah, let's keep it going until Nov 2020. But let's get rid of the lies. Of course, if we got rid of the lies, the impeachment would be over in about 2 weeks.

No, if you got rid of the lies, there never would be an impeachment, dumbass!

 

[Leo123]

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

In the past the discovery phase and the questioning of witnesses took place in public, not behind closed doors. This is bullshit and, unless you are a total Democrat tool, you know it's nothing but a clown show of propaganda. Let Pelosi call a vote.....Get this impeachment underway....But she won't because....And I repeat....There is no evidence. I already asked you guys to publish the now declassified transcript and point to the exact words that you feel support impeachment of a duly elected President. You didn't and you won't and Pelosi is playing games.

Depositions and testimony continue. Evidence is being gathered. Articles of impeachment will be drafted and voted on. The House will discuss the evidence and vote for impeachment. The Articles of impeachment will be made public. Witnesses in the Senate trial will be called. Defense will be proffered.

Nothing being done is unconstitutional, except, of course, the stonewalling by the White House. Subpoenas hold the penalty of law and ignoring such legal means constituents obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

The House is not involved it is only Pelosi because she refused to hold a vote, dufus. Subpoenas have no authority if there is not a bipartisan agreement. One person cannot impeach a sitting President. Just how stupid can you be? This is a coup. BTW you NEVER answered me as to where, in the actual transcript, evidence exists for impeachment of Trump. Are you going to continue to deflect and avoid?

 

[AntonToo]

And since it hasn't progress that far yet, now what? Are you going to hide under your bed covers and cry yourself to sleep? Will it keep you up all night in trembles? What happens if it doesn't get that far to go to a full vote?

And Joe Biden has ZERO input in the impeachment procedings in the House. If you tell a lie enough times does it make it the truth? Nope, it's still a lie.

Then it dies. Don't cry now Daryl

Then let it die. We all would be grateful.

I agree, let the impeachment die. It is useless.

If there is no proof of wrong doing found, it will be. It's a little bit early for that though.

Democrats do not get to investigate, investigate, and then investigate some more hoping to find something they can pin on Trump. That's called a fishing expedition, and it happens to be illegal under our Constitution.

Yea ok, why don't you go ahead and quote the Constitution setting limits on Congressional investigations....and then tell us why you think eight investigations for years and years on Benghazi were Constitutional.

 

[Nosmo King]

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

In the past the discovery phase and the questioning of witnesses took place in public, not behind closed doors. This is bullshit and, unless you are a total Democrat tool, you know it's nothing but a clown show of propaganda. Let Pelosi call a vote.....Get this impeachment underway....But she won't because....And I repeat....There is no evidence. I already asked you guys to publish the now declassified transcript and point to the exact words that you feel support impeachment of a duly elected President. You didn't and you won't and Pelosi is playing games.

Depositions and testimony continue. Evidence is being gathered. Articles of impeachment will be drafted and voted on. The House will discuss the evidence and vote for impeachment. The Articles of impeachment will be made public. Witnesses in the Senate trial will be called. Defense will be proffered.

Nothing being done is unconstitutional, except, of course, the stonewalling by the White House. Subpoenas hold the penalty of law and ignoring such legal means constituents obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

The House is not involved it is only Pelosi because she refused to hold a vote, dufus. Subpoenas have no authority if there is not a bipartisan agreement. One person cannot impeach a sitting President. Just how stupid can you be? This is a coup. BTW you NEVER answered me as to where, in the actual transcript, evidence exists for impeachment of Trump. Are you going to continue to deflect and avoid?

Show me where, in the constitution or the Rules of the House of Representatives it stipulates a vote of the House of Representatives is required to conduct an impeachment inquiry. Show me where in any rule it stipulates subpoenas are invalid.

I would like you to do us a favor, though.