Pelosi, unconstitutional impeachment

[Leo123]

Then it dies. Don't cry now Daryl

Then let it die. We all would be grateful.

I agree, let the impeachment die. It is useless.

If there is no proof of wrong doing found, it will be. It's a little bit early for that though.

Democrats do not get to investigate, investigate, and then investigate some more hoping to find something they can pin on Trump. That's called a fishing expedition, and it happens to be illegal under our Constitution.

Yea ok, why don't you go ahead and quote the Constitution setting limits on Congressional investigations....and then tell us why you think 72 months of Benghazi investigations were Constitutional.

Benghazi was not an impeachment.

 

[Leo123]

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

In the past the discovery phase and the questioning of witnesses took place in public, not behind closed doors. This is bullshit and, unless you are a total Democrat tool, you know it's nothing but a clown show of propaganda. Let Pelosi call a vote.....Get this impeachment underway....But she won't because....And I repeat....There is no evidence. I already asked you guys to publish the now declassified transcript and point to the exact words that you feel support impeachment of a duly elected President. You didn't and you won't and Pelosi is playing games.

Depositions and testimony continue. Evidence is being gathered. Articles of impeachment will be drafted and voted on. The House will discuss the evidence and vote for impeachment. The Articles of impeachment will be made public. Witnesses in the Senate trial will be called. Defense will be proffered.

Nothing being done is unconstitutional, except, of course, the stonewalling by the White House. Subpoenas hold the penalty of law and ignoring such legal means constituents obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

The House is not involved it is only Pelosi because she refused to hold a vote, dufus. Subpoenas have no authority if there is not a bipartisan agreement. One person cannot impeach a sitting President. Just how stupid can you be? This is a coup. BTW you NEVER answered me as to where, in the actual transcript, evidence exists for impeachment of Trump. Are you going to continue to deflect and avoid?

Show me where, in the constitution or the Rules of the House of Representatives it stipulates a vote of the House of Representatives is required to conduct an impeachment inquiry. Show me where in any rule it stipulates subpoenas are invalid.

I would like you to do us a favor, though.

I disagree with your premise in the first place. I already explained to you the a vote gives legitimacy to an impeachment. You ignored it. I already asked you to publish the exact section of the already declassified transcript that supports impeachment of a duly elected US President. So far you have not provided anything other than your opinion.

Unfortunately, for you, opinions are like assholes....everyone has one and it certainly doesn't represent legal proof. Do you ever ask yourself why Trump is calling for an impeachment vote and Pelosi has refused? You can't be that ******* dumb...can you?

 

[busybee01]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Trump is the one who is running roughshod over the Congress. The Congress has the power of the purse, the power of oversight and the power to make laws. That is granted to Congress by the Constitution.

The Constitution grants Congress the power to impeach a President. It leaves how it is done to the Congress. It does not require any other vote than a vote on whether the President should be impeached. These subpoenas are enforceable under Congress' oversight powers which are granted by the Constitution. There is no coup as impeachment is a legal procedure and there is no due process since this is not a criminal trial.

 

[BULLDOG]

And since it hasn't progress that far yet, now what? Are you going to hide under your bed covers and cry yourself to sleep? Will it keep you up all night in trembles? What happens if it doesn't get that far to go to a full vote?

And Joe Biden has ZERO input in the impeachment procedings in the House. If you tell a lie enough times does it make it the truth? Nope, it's still a lie.

Then it dies. Don't cry now Daryl

Then let it die. We all would be grateful.

I agree, let the impeachment die. It is useless.

If there is no proof of wrong doing found, it will be. It's a little bit early for that though.

Democrats do not get to investigate, investigate, and then investigate some more hoping to find something they can pin on Trump. That's called a fishing expedition, and it happens to be illegal under our Constitution.

If I counted correctly, you are saying three investigations are too many. It hasn't been three investigations, but I didn't hear you complaining about the 10 separate investigations into Benghazi. Why didn't those bother you? If you are aware of illegal activity, you should call 911 to report it immediately.

 

[busybee01]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

Trump can defend himself in the Senate trial. There is no due process.

 

[Nosmo King]

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

In the past the discovery phase and the questioning of witnesses took place in public, not behind closed doors. This is bullshit and, unless you are a total Democrat tool, you know it's nothing but a clown show of propaganda. Let Pelosi call a vote.....Get this impeachment underway....But she won't because....And I repeat....There is no evidence. I already asked you guys to publish the now declassified transcript and point to the exact words that you feel support impeachment of a duly elected President. You didn't and you won't and Pelosi is playing games.

Depositions and testimony continue. Evidence is being gathered. Articles of impeachment will be drafted and voted on. The House will discuss the evidence and vote for impeachment. The Articles of impeachment will be made public. Witnesses in the Senate trial will be called. Defense will be proffered.

Nothing being done is unconstitutional, except, of course, the stonewalling by the White House. Subpoenas hold the penalty of law and ignoring such legal means constituents obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

The House is not involved it is only Pelosi because she refused to hold a vote, dufus. Subpoenas have no authority if there is not a bipartisan agreement. One person cannot impeach a sitting President. Just how stupid can you be? This is a coup. BTW you NEVER answered me as to where, in the actual transcript, evidence exists for impeachment of Trump. Are you going to continue to deflect and avoid?

Show me where, in the constitution or the Rules of the House of Representatives it stipulates a vote of the House of Representatives is required to conduct an impeachment inquiry. Show me where in any rule it stipulates subpoenas are invalid.

I would like you to do us a favor, though.

I disagree with your premise in the first place. I already explained to you the a vote gives legitimacy to an impeachment. You ignored it. I already asked you to publish the exact section of the already declassified transcript that supports impeachment of a duly elected US President. So far you have not provided anything other than your opinion.

Unfortunately, for you, opinions are like assholes....everyone has one and it certainly doesn't represent legal proof. Do you ever ask yourself why Trump is calling for an impeachment vote and Pelosi has refused? You can't be that ******* dumb...can you?

After criminal complaints were given to the Department of Justice, why has there been no inquiries, investigations and witness interviews been conducted by the Department of Justice?

I would like you to do us a favor though.

 

[BULLDOG]

The discovery phase happens before trial. The indictment is unsealed and defense gets all the evidence presented to the grand jury. Read the articles of impeachment are unsealed and the defense gets all the evidence presented to the House Intelligence committe, and all other committees conducting the impeachment inquiry.

At the trial in the Senate, Trump may call all the witnesses he wants. I suggest Giuliani. He'd be great!

In the past the discovery phase and the questioning of witnesses took place in public, not behind closed doors. This is bullshit and, unless you are a total Democrat tool, you know it's nothing but a clown show of propaganda. Let Pelosi call a vote.....Get this impeachment underway....But she won't because....And I repeat....There is no evidence. I already asked you guys to publish the now declassified transcript and point to the exact words that you feel support impeachment of a duly elected President. You didn't and you won't and Pelosi is playing games.

Depositions and testimony continue. Evidence is being gathered. Articles of impeachment will be drafted and voted on. The House will discuss the evidence and vote for impeachment. The Articles of impeachment will be made public. Witnesses in the Senate trial will be called. Defense will be proffered.

Nothing being done is unconstitutional, except, of course, the stonewalling by the White House. Subpoenas hold the penalty of law and ignoring such legal means constituents obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

The House is not involved it is only Pelosi because she refused to hold a vote, dufus. Subpoenas have no authority if there is not a bipartisan agreement. One person cannot impeach a sitting President. Just how stupid can you be? This is a coup. BTW you NEVER answered me as to where, in the actual transcript, evidence exists for impeachment of Trump. Are you going to continue to deflect and avoid?

Show me where, in the constitution or the Rules of the House of Representatives it stipulates a vote of the House of Representatives is required to conduct an impeachment inquiry. Show me where in any rule it stipulates subpoenas are invalid.

I would like you to do us a favor, though.

I disagree with your premise in the first place. I already explained to you the a vote gives legitimacy to an impeachment. You ignored it. I already asked you to publish the exact section of the already declassified transcript that supports impeachment of a duly elected US President. So far you have not provided anything other than your opinion.

Unfortunately, for you, opinions are like assholes....everyone has one and it certainly doesn't represent legal proof. Do you ever ask yourself why Trump is calling for an impeachment vote and Pelosi has refused? You can't be that ******* dumb...can you?

That's funny. As a Trump supporter, you should be the last person to complain about anything being illegitimate. Trump will never be seen as a legitimate president.

 

[Leo123]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Trump is the one who is running roughshod over the Congress. The Congress has the power of the purse, the power of oversight and the power to make laws. That is granted to Congress by the Constitution.

The Constitution grants Congress the power to impeach a President. It leaves how it is done to the Congress. It does not require any other vote than a vote on whether the President should be impeached. These subpoenas are enforceable under Congress' oversight powers which are granted by the Constitution. There is no coup as impeachment is a legal procedure and there is no due process since this is not a criminal trial.

The Congress is not impeaching Trump, Pelosi is because she has no support. How ******* stupid are you?

 

[busybee01]

There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again!

The impeachment inquiry is real. The Constitution does not say anything about a impeachment inquiry. How it was done previously is not legally binding on any Congress. You through around a lot of words that you clearly have no clue about. There is no such thing as legal precedence in a impeachment inquiry.

 

[Leo123]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

Trump can defend himself in the Senate trial. There is no due process.

Correct, 'there is no due process' anywhere in Pelosi's and the Squad's impeachment efforts. One gets discovery BEFORE a trial you ******* retard.

 

[busybee01]

There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again!

If you want to "win again", then you must either...

1. cite the passage in the US Constitution where it stipulates that the House must vote on whether to BEGIN an impeachment inquiry, or...

2. cite the rule in the Rules of the US House of Representatives where it stipulates that the House must conduct a vote on whether to BEGIN...

Fail to do either, and you do not "win again"... rather, you LOSE... so... knock yourself out... let's see those citations...

"The House of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment according to Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution. It was designed to include the entire house by a vote, not just the democrats."

"Joe Biden is actually interfering in our election by promoting the use of the impeachment inquiry process for his own political gain and should be criminally investigated for his Ukrainian collusion."

October 9, 2019

The House is not voting on a impeachment. They are gathering information. The Constitution says nothing about that.

 

[Leo123]

There is nothing in the US Constitution about HOW the House shall conduct Impeachment of the President.

Everything that the House of Representatives is doing, related to this Impeachment Inquiry, is, indeed, 'constitutional'.

Now... whether it's Smart Politics, to withhold a broader House vote on commencing the Inquiry, well, that's another matter.

Dems can be every bit as Optics-Blind as the Pubs - in their own foolish way.

Nancy has not lodged a formal impeachment inquiry. So far her impeachment efforts are meaningless propaganda. Our recent impeachments (Nixon, Clinton) were formal and the defendants were allowed to call witnesses, etc. There is precedent. Nancy is ignoring the Constitution and legal precedence. Oh look! funnyface VOR has noting to say. I win again!

The impeachment inquiry is real. The Constitution does not say anything about a impeachment inquiry. How it was done previously is not legally binding on any Congress. You through around a lot of words that you clearly have no clue about. There is no such thing as legal precedence in a impeachment inquiry.

You sound like the other stupid brain washed Pelosi parrots who have their beaks up her flabby ass. Go away, you are embarrassing yourself.

 

[BluesLegend]

Nancy Pelosi got 280k votes, Trump got over 60 million so shut the hell up Nancy Pelosi.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There will be no impeachment. Democrsts just want to keep the hysteria going until the election. Maybe they can have an effect.

They will too. Trump is looking at a land slide.

 

[busybee01]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

Trump is the one who is running roughshod over the Congress. The Congress has the power of the purse, the power of oversight and the power to make laws. That is granted to Congress by the Constitution.

The Constitution grants Congress the power to impeach a President. It leaves how it is done to the Congress. It does not require any other vote than a vote on whether the President should be impeached. These subpoenas are enforceable under Congress' oversight powers which are granted by the Constitution. There is no coup as impeachment is a legal procedure and there is no due process since this is not a criminal trial.

The Congress is not impeaching Trump, Pelosi is because she has no support. How ******* stupid are you?

You are plenty ******* stupid. Pelosi has opened a inquiry. She is not impeaching Trump.

 

[Leo123]

The House is not voting on a impeachment. They are gathering information. The Constitution says nothing about that.

Since when is 'gathering information' called an 'impeachment'....seriously are you mentally challenged?

 

[busybee01]

So far Nancy-pants has been completely riding roughshod over the Constitution with this non-impeachment/impeachment. She, or the House, has 0 authority to expect their subpoenas to be acted upon because she refuses to bring formal charges. Trump even invited her to do so. If you don't think something is rotten in the House you are oblivious. The Democrat party has hijacked the House and are denying Trump due process in a coup attempt.

If you tell the same set of lies enough times does it become the truth? Nope, it's still a batch of lies.

Nancy refuses to make a formal impeachment which would allow Trump to defend himself. Where is the lie?

Trump can defend himself in the Senate trial. There is no due process.

Correct, 'there is no due process' anywhere in Pelosi's and the Squad's impeachment efforts. One gets discovery BEFORE a trial you ******* retard.

You are the ******* retard. This is not a criminal trial. There is no due process nor is there such a thing as discovery.

 

[BluesLegend]

The House is not voting on a impeachment. They are gathering information. The Constitution says nothing about that.

Its the most TRANSPARENT process ever. By that I mean its completely conducted in secret behind closed doors. Witness denied counsel. The White House denied counsel. Witnesses threatened with obstruction if they refuse to lie and support the Dem narrative. The House Judicial committee members are BANNED from the secret meetings on legal matters related to impeachment. Holy shit Dem's have gone off the deep end.

 

[Leo123]

You are plenty ******* stupid. Pelosi has opened a inquiry. She is not impeaching Trump.

Pelosi Says Impeachment Should Stay Focused on Ukraine.

Pelosi says impeachment should stay focused on Ukraine. Some liberals say that's a big mistake.

Seriously, what the Hell is wrong with you?

 

[busybee01]

The House is not voting on a impeachment. They are gathering information. The Constitution says nothing about that.

Since when is 'gathering information' called an 'impeachment'....seriously are you mentally challenged?

Pelosi has not called it a impeachment. You are the one who is mentally retarded as are most trump supporters.